HOME | DD

vadersb — Pods Extreme

Published: 2010-09-09 07:11:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 1261; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description A new quick small game. Designed to provide maximum excitement per second of playing
Related content
Comments: 15

Amadeus8 [2010-12-29 15:59:58 +0000 UTC]

Sh!!!t this is awesome!!!!! and hard

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Doctor-Y-Lime [2010-12-26 05:53:19 +0000 UTC]

I have one problem with it: It keeps saying I have an unfair advantage because my computer is too slow.
My computer isn't slow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vadersb In reply to Doctor-Y-Lime [2010-12-26 13:17:16 +0000 UTC]

Sorry to hear. That is third-party anti-cheating protection. Please try it on another computer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doctor-Y-Lime In reply to vadersb [2010-12-27 01:43:10 +0000 UTC]

Well, the one I played it one was the best computer my family has. :C

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ilikedrawingstuffs [2010-12-11 09:14:57 +0000 UTC]

Awesome game,enjoyable despite the simple use of the mouse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pirlipat [2010-09-22 00:59:18 +0000 UTC]

great game!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lazareus [2010-09-09 10:21:36 +0000 UTC]

it's great

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vadersb In reply to Lazareus [2010-09-10 15:50:30 +0000 UTC]

thanks, man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lazareus In reply to vadersb [2010-09-10 16:01:55 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZippyDee [2010-09-09 08:49:57 +0000 UTC]

Very nice! I especially love the graphics! However, it tends to get a little choppy when there are more things on the screen. Sometimes more than just a little...

How many fps is this running at? That could be a large contributor.

But still, that's one little thing. The whole game is great! I really like it! Great work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vadersb In reply to ZippyDee [2010-09-10 15:50:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! We're running on 120 FPS cap, adapting to current time delta between frames. Well, some browsers tend to work more smooth with flash that others. I get best performance in Google Chrome, while worst in Firefox and IE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZippyDee In reply to vadersb [2010-09-10 21:19:25 +0000 UTC]

Okay, yeah. I thought it was 120. Just from a developing point of view, you should try to make your games as versatile as possible so the largest number of people can fully enjoy them. The human eye takes in information at around 60 fps. 120 fps basically means you are adding an extra frame that a human isn't even going to see.

I think if you were to take it down to 60 fps it would probably still look just as smooth, but it would be able to run on slower computers and in slower browsers.

Just a tip, but still, as I said before, great game with great execution of concept!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vadersb In reply to ZippyDee [2010-09-15 08:03:17 +0000 UTC]

well, this is pretty complex topic actually. Our tests shown that 60fps capped version is less smooth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZippyDee In reply to vadersb [2010-09-15 08:14:12 +0000 UTC]

Well, that makes sense that it would be less smooth, because at 120 fps, your eye is blending the light from two individual frames, instead of one. That would definitely smooth the movement. I am just saying that at 60 fps, the game would function to the same level, and most likely still look wonderful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

vadersb In reply to ZippyDee [2010-09-15 13:16:41 +0000 UTC]

well, yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0