HOME | DD

Published: 2008-10-21 23:46:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 10746; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 10938
Redirect to original
Description
I made this for Modeling for Game Design class.The Su- 37 is a russian aircraft and possibly one of the most agile and maneuverable aircraft on the planet. With its thrust vectoring, canards, and extremely agile shape gives the Su-37 unprecedented mobility. This fighter alone has claimed several world records in those areas. I wouldn't want to face one of these in battle X_X.
Related content
Comments: 29
GTD-Orion [2010-01-16 20:06:41 +0000 UTC]
Hey, could you upload this model anywhere, with the textures extracted as well?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to GTD-Orion [2010-01-17 00:52:12 +0000 UTC]
Dunno, it is a Maya file. I also wonder if I still have that. Sorry flag ship of the Galactic Terran Alliance. I might have it somewhere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GTD-Orion In reply to VengenceMkII [2010-01-17 01:14:52 +0000 UTC]
Please, could you look around for it? I can't find any other such model anywhere, and I really want to put it in FreeSpace2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to GTD-Orion [2010-01-17 16:39:08 +0000 UTC]
D=... why do you want to put an aerospace fighter into Freespace2? Shouldn't you be trying to put something spacey in it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GTD-Orion In reply to VengenceMkII [2010-01-17 19:42:41 +0000 UTC]
I'm making an atmospheric fighters mod.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KahunaSniper [2009-06-06 17:59:20 +0000 UTC]
The most agile aircraft on the market now ar ethe Russian Su-47, American F-22 and F-35, and the new American F-15SE Silent Eagle.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Neetil88 In reply to KahunaSniper [2010-03-23 08:51:24 +0000 UTC]
im sry... but what r u saying? the russian Su-47 is only a prototype.. so its not on the market and the F-35 isnt agile at all... Su-37 is probably the most agile of them all
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KahunaSniper In reply to Neetil88 [2010-03-24 04:12:16 +0000 UTC]
lol But, the 37 was cancelled. I think only two were made. Still a good aircraft non-the-less.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Neetil88 In reply to KahunaSniper [2010-04-05 07:07:07 +0000 UTC]
hmm.. never heard the 37 got canceld.. the 47 yeah... but not the 37... even heard that russia is gonna get 130+ ( i think ) Su-35's ... and they r like only a lil downgraded 37
Neetil88
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KahunaSniper In reply to Neetil88 [2010-04-05 07:11:41 +0000 UTC]
The 37 was all about experimental thrust-vectorin'. Cancelled. Even though it was a beast in the skies. The 47 is still in the works. It's even more badass, but no thrust-vectorin'.
The 35 is just the watered down version of the 37. I'd've upgraded to the 37 instead. 'cause it was obviously a better plane.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Neetil88 In reply to KahunaSniper [2010-04-05 07:17:06 +0000 UTC]
yeah.. i agree on the 37>35 but... didnt u get the 37 and 47 mixed up? the 47 has the swept forward wings..and it got canceld cuz of the cost when the ussr collapsed ... and they didnt continue the project now and went to develope the PAK FA
sry if i made some typos my english isnt that good
Neetil88
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KahunaSniper In reply to Neetil88 [2010-04-05 07:51:21 +0000 UTC]
No. The 37 was cancelled, and really they weren't their own plane, just conversions of two 35s. The 37 is a tech. demonstrator for future Russian fighters. Haven't seen much new info on either planes.
The PAK FA is one of the 47s "future Russian fighter" branch-offs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Neetil88 In reply to KahunaSniper [2010-04-05 09:11:14 +0000 UTC]
aham... and forget bout my previous comment bout the 47 in soviet era.. kinda messed up lawlz
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KahunaSniper In reply to Neetil88 [2010-04-05 09:12:41 +0000 UTC]
lol I was all "wtf . . ." xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dainiuxxl [2009-03-02 23:13:16 +0000 UTC]
F-22 can be detected if he carries missiles and stealth won't help
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to Dainiuxxl [2009-03-03 01:11:38 +0000 UTC]
But then they can hold 6 missiles in those belly bays. Two are enough to fire off a quick salvo and wipe out an opposing squadron. That is dangerous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dainiuxxl In reply to VengenceMkII [2009-03-03 20:18:48 +0000 UTC]
yes, and its all advantage they get , F-22 was design for stealth and su-37 for dogfight if su-37 gets close to F-22 it would be equal fight ,pilot versus pilot
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to Dainiuxxl [2009-03-04 00:38:25 +0000 UTC]
That is usually how russian craft are designed, Dogfighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ACZCipher [2008-11-19 15:37:55 +0000 UTC]
Great model, now this one is something I'd want in LockOn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to ACZCipher [2008-11-19 19:43:11 +0000 UTC]
I think the weaker version is in LockOn. Heh, from some vids I saw that the Su-27 is superior to the F-15 though that was in a close dogfight where the Su-27's extreme agility comes into play.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RunawayDanish [2008-10-21 23:47:55 +0000 UTC]
WOOOOOOOOOOOO! I love this plane XD
<.<
Eat your heart out F/A-22. Atleast this plane looks kewl XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to RunawayDanish [2008-10-22 02:56:11 +0000 UTC]
I hear that if stealth wasn't taken into consideration this plane could actually beat an F-22 in a dogfight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RunawayDanish In reply to VengenceMkII [2008-10-22 03:00:04 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I hear that too. As long as the '37 could get in close without biting it from the long range missile system on the F/A-22, and as long as there is a decent pilot in the seat, the '37 could drop a '22... and cost said Air Force a ton of money!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to RunawayDanish [2008-10-22 03:26:43 +0000 UTC]
True but stealth and range is working against it. Its a great looking fighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ACZCipher In reply to VengenceMkII [2008-11-19 15:36:51 +0000 UTC]
Stealt is overrated. The new generation radar allows Su-35\37 effectively track and engage stealth fighters. And since both planes have pretty similar missile range (~70km), they're on equal footing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to ACZCipher [2008-11-19 19:42:19 +0000 UTC]
I heard that you can detect stealth but that would also add tons of clutter to a radar so you'd need computer systems smart enough to clean that clutter. Oh yeah. F-22s also cannot use their radars. They rely on AWACS for radar so if the AWACS are down... well... they'd have to resort to active radar I suppose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ACZCipher In reply to VengenceMkII [2008-11-20 08:38:38 +0000 UTC]
Well, I've heard, that the new Su-35BM has very poweful computer system, which handles it's weapon system, radar and 3-d thrust vectoring system. It must be powerful enough.
As for the AWACS, there is A-50, though we have only a few of them. Also, 4 MiG-31s can act as AWACS, they have extremely powerful radars.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
VengenceMkII In reply to ACZCipher [2008-11-20 12:10:56 +0000 UTC]
I meant the F-22 needs AWACS for radar cause if they use radar their stealth is blown. But yeah,I heard of the mig 31 thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0