HOME | DD

#animals #dinosaurs #dragons #jurassicpark #prehistoricanimals #pterosaurs #quetzalcoatlus #jurassicworld #drawdinovember2015
Published: 2015-11-03 18:28:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 22086; Favourites: 665; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Pterosaurs are my favorite dino-adjacent prehistoric animals.They were literally fireless dragons and there is nothing better than that.
*DISCLAIMER: This is OBVIOUSLY VERY SPECULATIVE, and in many ways is more fantastical than paleontological. I'm well aware of the "inaccuracies" but nevertheless here it is, the Quetzacoatlus.
Related content
Comments: 68
Preradkor [2015-11-03 21:13:26 +0000 UTC]
Hightly speculative, but the way wings are folded seems to be correct. In most recostruction of pterosaur on the ground they hold their wings only partialy folded, like Vought f4u Corsair plane (which suggest wing atony). What uncomfortable way of walking it would be!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vincent-Covielloart In reply to Preradkor [2015-11-03 21:35:27 +0000 UTC]
I went for a more bat like approach but your explanation seems pretty accurate. But this is nothing more than speculation on my part.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Preradkor In reply to Vincent-Covielloart [2015-11-03 21:40:40 +0000 UTC]
Well, there is a reason why bat fold their wings this way. It is the most comfortable possible way to using wings for walking. Pterosaurs probably knew it too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hyrotrioskjan [2015-11-03 20:49:14 +0000 UTC]
This looks really interesting but there are indeed a few common inaccuracies, most important: azhdarchids were even more weird. The head was nearly 3 times longer than the body. On the other side the hands are a little smaller and the feet are less wide.
But the speculative soft tissue looks fascinating!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vincent-Covielloart In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2015-11-03 21:36:36 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the info. I treated this more as a fantasy representation than anything else. I'm not a paleo artist by any means.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PLASTOSPLEEN In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 20:36:20 +0000 UTC]
Looks David Peters-esque, but in a good way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AntoninJury In reply to arvalis [2015-11-03 20:24:31 +0000 UTC]
Ahah, not sure it's a compliment !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vincent-Covielloart In reply to AntoninJury [2015-11-03 21:32:36 +0000 UTC]
Haha! I'm not sure it is either judging by the amount of hate he's been getting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MJMSTUDIOS2020 In reply to ??? [2015-11-03 19:38:32 +0000 UTC]
I love Quetza, Oh wait, I'm talking about the snake "Quatzl".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MJMSTUDIOS2020 In reply to Vincent-Covielloart [2015-11-03 23:24:34 +0000 UTC]
X3 I got a little confused as to which cryptid you were drawing. =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |