HOME | DD

Published: 2012-01-27 23:59:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 7768; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 749
Redirect to original
Description
Circle Limit III with fractal boundary and rectangular limitRelated content
Comments: 11
z0k [2012-04-01 06:52:45 +0000 UTC]
Would it be ok for me to use this for a while on my facebook page?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vladimir-Bulatov In reply to z0k [2012-04-03 03:49:56 +0000 UTC]
Yes, it would be OK.
Some form of credit would be appreciated
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ann-McLaren [2012-01-29 17:54:54 +0000 UTC]
Your deviation has been featured in my journal this week. [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ann-McLaren In reply to Vladimir-Bulatov [2012-01-30 13:09:08 +0000 UTC]
You are very welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShaylynnAnn [2012-01-28 19:02:37 +0000 UTC]
Wow. I wish I knew the math behind this, I have a hard enough time with the circular poincare disk! Is this hyperbolic or fractal?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vladimir-Bulatov In reply to ShaylynnAnn [2012-01-29 02:56:54 +0000 UTC]
The math is based on Moebius transformations in complex plane.
They are genuine 3D hyperbolic transformation in 3D hyperbolic space but
observed on the boundary of the Poincare ball (analog of Poincare disk
for 3D hyperbolic space). The boundary of Poincare ball is projected
onto plane via stereographic projection.
So all the fishes are identical as they are in original Poincare disc view
in M.C.Escher woodcut.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hop41 [2012-01-28 00:46:40 +0000 UTC]
Looks like it has 180 degree rotational symmetry?
I had thought it was circles intersecting the rectangle boundary at 90 degrees, somewhat like a poincare disk. But the big "circles" in the lower right and upper left look decidedly elliptical.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vladimir-Bulatov In reply to Hop41 [2012-01-29 02:49:20 +0000 UTC]
All circles were originally circles, but after conformal mapping (Mercator projection) they were a little squashed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0