HOME | DD

VoughtVindicator — Rezonans-class submarine by-nc-nd

Published: 2012-02-18 22:44:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 30973; Favourites: 197; Downloads: 544
Redirect to original
Description Well, seeing how much the audience appears to like these things, here's a third Nationstates ship. Like the carrier, this one is not inspired in any real project and is instead 100% original.

It's the Rezonans-class guided missile submarine, codenamed "Project 961". It's meant as a replacement for an aging fleet of Oscar-class submarines that, in the 21st century teather of warfare, are already starting to suffer from both hull wear and noise levels which are quite obstructing to its main task of sneaking up to enemy aircraft carriers and destroying them from long-range with missile fire. Rezonans does pretty much the same, albeit with a renewed set of systems to increase its lethality against current and future aircraft carrier groups, starting by replacing the Oscar's main weapon, the P-700 Granit missiles, with 24 tubes for Kh-90 Gela ramjet hypersonic anti-ship missiles, while keeping 10 torpedo tubes with 30 torpedoes for self-defense against submarines and quick ships that hunt it down. An odd addition for a submarine, it's equipped with 4 7-short Klinok launchers to destroy anti-submarine aircraft, helicopters, missiles and bombs when surfaced, though there are plans to replace them with heatseekers that can be fired while submerged.

More importantly, though, the MGK-540 sonar system found on the Oscar-class has been replaced with the MGK-590, a sonar system with an enormous spherical array that's so huge that it requires the torpedo tubes to be slanted, making the torpedoes come slightly to the sides of the ship. On top of the main frontal array, there's also very low frequency and low frequency arrays on the sides, an active sonar on the sail and mine detection sonars above and below the main array. This allows the submarine to make full use of the very long range of its missiles and be able to direct its missiles from more than 500km away from its target if the conditions are right, giving it enough time to escape any possible anti-submarine retaliation that may ensue. It can expel its whole ammunition load in less than a minute, and the missiles themselves can further network with each other mid-flight so as to narrow down the location of the enemy ships using active radar.

Also it posesses a much smoother shape than Oscar, designed to reduce low-frequency noise caused by turbulence and a ducted propeller to reduce the mid-frequency noise of the propeller, as well as to prevent cavitation from its tips when going at a high speed. It's been made with as few protruding components as possible, which makes its handling in ports a titch hard as the thick ropes need to be passed through dents in the outer hull. It's also quite expensive for its size, at 2.56 billion USD per ship.

Drawn in shipbucket's scale
Related content
Comments: 31

optimal19822 [2019-10-18 19:24:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to optimal19822 [2019-10-21 17:43:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RedStarryNight [2018-03-27 22:17:36 +0000 UTC]

When I think about future Russian SSGNs, this is my model. It's a perfect design (although you might be able to update its arsenal: the Russians are currently designing a hypersonic missile that could take the place of the Kh-90, which I think is more of a land-attack weapon anyway.)
Thank you for making this and sharing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to RedStarryNight [2018-03-28 00:41:49 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, a redo of this submarine with Tsirkon missiles will be really good, thank you for reminding me I made this. I might do a 3D model of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RedStarryNight In reply to VoughtVindicator [2018-04-02 20:47:11 +0000 UTC]

Coolsies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Carrier2 [2017-01-04 19:41:25 +0000 UTC]

In the description, you said that the propellor is ducted not just to reduce the mid-frequency noise level, but also to prevent cavitation at the tips of the propellor when the submarine is moving at high speed. This begs the question: just how fast can this submarine move both surfaced and submerged?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Carrier2 [2017-01-05 18:50:47 +0000 UTC]

Probably around 30 knots submerged, slower when surfaced

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Passin [2013-11-17 20:43:22 +0000 UTC]

Looks good. No idea if it would work, but it looks right

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2012-12-04 04:55:20 +0000 UTC]

Awesome sub.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Virus-Tormentor [2012-07-21 01:14:06 +0000 UTC]

Looks cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Virus-Tormentor [2012-07-21 01:20:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Virus-Tormentor In reply to VoughtVindicator [2012-07-21 01:26:53 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Super6-4 [2012-05-09 21:13:33 +0000 UTC]

Yikes, I'd prefer it on my side. Looks sweet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arenafighter [2012-03-15 02:48:37 +0000 UTC]

Super Cool! has a 'Seaquest' flavor to it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IgorKutuzov [2012-02-20 12:11:02 +0000 UTC]

the replacement for my favourite submarine... became my new favourite submarine !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to IgorKutuzov [2012-02-20 19:06:58 +0000 UTC]

It's hard to make justice to the original Oscar... but I'm very glad I succeeded

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AvroArrow [2012-02-19 01:14:01 +0000 UTC]

Very nice, the only thing I can say in real life all those sensors hanging out of A) the pressure hull B) not within a sort of one major covering, would make this sub extremely noise and as result noticeable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to AvroArrow [2012-02-19 02:21:54 +0000 UTC]

The sensors are retractable, they're shown deployed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Emilion-3 [2012-02-19 01:12:23 +0000 UTC]

i will use for Mcnernian Royal navy perhaps

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Emilion-3 [2012-02-19 02:23:08 +0000 UTC]

It's not for sale though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to VoughtVindicator [2012-02-19 02:46:48 +0000 UTC]

i am willing to pay...not really if you know what i mean...in NS i wnat o evaluate this sub

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Emilion-3 [2012-02-19 02:48:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well, it's not about paying or not, it's just that it really wasn't meant for export. My nation likes to own stuff more advanced than the stuff we export, like Russia in real life

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to VoughtVindicator [2012-02-19 13:40:49 +0000 UTC]

Well russia exported a hell of a lot of stuff too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Emilion-3 [2012-02-19 15:13:06 +0000 UTC]

They never exported their top-notch equipment; only inferior versions and outdated types in most of the cases

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Emilion-3 In reply to VoughtVindicator [2012-02-20 01:37:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh Ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zero-Z66 [2012-02-19 00:56:59 +0000 UTC]

Nice submarine you have here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Zero-Z66 [2012-02-19 02:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I'm thinking of making an attack submarine counterpart to this one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Moriskov [2012-02-18 22:58:02 +0000 UTC]

Pretty impressive

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to Moriskov [2012-02-19 02:23:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AresXVIII [2012-02-18 22:56:12 +0000 UTC]

hey that is quite a cool one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to AresXVIII [2012-02-19 02:23:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 0