HOME | DD

Published: 2013-01-18 11:12:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 25498; Favourites: 413; Downloads: 368
Redirect to original
Description
While technological development has been largely stunted in the postmodern era for the lenght of the corporations' rule, financial growth hasn't, resulting in the economies of the corporations being worth hundreds of trillions of dollars. This economy is, most of the time, based on several fiat currencies with no backing issued by the corporations or by blocks of corporations. Money issued by one company could be completely worthless when buying products made by another company, and consumers had to keep dozens of different currencies on their wallets to function effectively. Currency was tied to the entities that issued it: if a corporation suffered financial problems, all currency issued by it would undergo a massive loss of liquidity due to people switching to other less risky currencies.Such a complicated, hermetic system cut heavily into consumption and gridlocked the global financial trade. It was thus decided that corporate money needed at least some partial backing to standarize currency..
The problem was that the sum of gold in the world accounted for little more than 1.8 trillion dollars. Even for the standards of corporate backing and fractional reserve lending, that sum was trivial to the point where it would not be an effective backer. Thus the corporations needed something more valuable to set prices, and turned on to the most valuable thing in existence: antimatter. At 25 billion per gram, a spoonful could back up the currency issued by entire corporations and manage to standarize prices. Now currency system at least had a stepping stone and corporations had a safe haven to invest in in times of trouble. Of course, given the potential explosive yield of antimatter, the reserves are taken care of zealously.
The biggest of such reserves, totaling almost 3 kilograms of antihydrogen, is located on the largest ship ever constructed, The Simeon, belonging to a corporation of the same name hailing from the lands of former Israel. It is a floating mobile city exceeding two and a half kilometers in lenght filled with condominium housing for 80,000 people alongside a similar number of passengers. Inside are some of the most luxurious malls and entertainment values available, alongside hotels, schools, hospitals and even a rapit transit system of monorails. Its residents are all of Israeli origin and have established a highly folklorical, mysterious microculture away from the corporations based on obscure pseudo-judeochristian traditions. The passegers, crew and tourists are of all races and creeds, however.
It acts as a diplomatically neutral self-contained city where people may negotiate free of corporate territorial conflict or tariffs, and as such it has gained a reputation as a safe haven of stability. The ship posesses a long slightly angled runway allowing passengers and supplies to arrive by air, though noise levels and the hard landing procedure mean that the airstrip is rarely used and the ship is instead supplied from its three well decks, as it is too large to be able to dock in any port of the world. For this same reason, maintenance isn't carried out in repair yards but in-situ by specialized ships and an unique engineering submarine. The Simeon is propelled by sixteen pumpjets powered by eight molten lead reactors, and it continuously circumnavigates the world.
While the ship is largely assumed to risk no attack by any corporate military (as doing so would benefit no corporation), the ship is nevertheless always escorted by two vessels, Khazar and Chaldea - a Forrestal-class aircraft carrier and a Ticonderoga-class cruiser, both modified with compact pressurized water nuclear powerplants; tasked with keeping lesser attackers such as pirates and mercenaries away. Both ships are also owned by the Simeon corporation, giving it the distinction of being one of the few companies that operates aircraft carriers. As part of its defensive complement, the Simeon has an AEGIS suite directing several discrete naval artillery mountings and VLS tubes. The ship also generally holds two or more fast attack craft on its well decks.
In addition to the antimatter, which despite passengers and crew being told over and over again is completely safe, adds up to more than 60 megatons of energy were it to detonate; the ship contains many valuables and relics in its gigantic vaults, considered to be the safest of the world. Anything that the corporations want either completely safe or completely hidden away is entrusted upon The Simeon, making the ship the centerpiece of sinister rumors telling of the secrets and horrors sealed away in the ship beneath its faccade of luxury and commerce.
Only one of those rumors has been confirmed: one of the vaults of the ship contains the dismantled Western Wall, an important site in Jewish religion previously thought to have been demolished and paved over to make way to several corporate arcologies.
Related content
Comments: 61
neon-17677 [2022-12-29 01:17:10 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
thormemeson [2018-04-13 20:26:12 +0000 UTC]
Damn that thing is huge I have to ask. Did someone just steal all of Australia?
π: 0 β©: 0
dinobenoid3 [2016-11-01 17:09:08 +0000 UTC]
I just love love the story behind this, that's what makes it really good.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dominiumfighter [2016-08-24 21:15:10 +0000 UTC]
SUPER Design! How many Decks? How many Tenders?
π: 1 β©: 0
superpic [2016-03-22 13:10:02 +0000 UTC]
Kinda nit picky, but my admittedly limited research suggests that much antimatter could explode with more than double the force listed..... Just a thought...
π: 0 β©: 0
JazzLizard [2014-02-11 19:14:50 +0000 UTC]
I like it. I like it's scale and overall concept, and the world you've created to go along with it, but it's so long it would have to avoid any turbulent water at all, or else I'd be worried it might break its back. Research ships have measured waves in the ocean measuring upwards of 100 feet, and not just on occasion.
It's cool none the less.
π: 0 β©: 0
F4Ucorsair [2014-02-10 22:52:17 +0000 UTC]
"corporations issuing fiat currencies" Β hahahah what are you smoking.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to F4Ucorsair [2014-02-11 00:27:31 +0000 UTC]
There's no state, so corporations are the only macroeconomic entities left. Do you expect multinationals to use bartering?
π: 0 β©: 1
F4Ucorsair In reply to VoughtVindicator [2014-02-12 22:35:38 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, actually. Β Commodities, stocks, bonds and other things with value based in the real world. Β Trading on fiat currency is just too economically unsound. Β Other alternatives are going back to precious metals, or one of the emerging group of cryptocurrencies like dogecoin and Coinye West.Β
If you intend to write about an anarchic society, I really encourage you to read current anarchist theory, instead of just making assumptions that it'll be worse without governments.Β
π: 1 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to F4Ucorsair [2014-02-13 00:04:29 +0000 UTC]
The writeup explains why they don't trade with precious metals; there is simply not enough precious metals on the globe to meaningfully back or keep up with the speed and magnitude at which their net worth increases. To a point their fiat currencies are backed by the assets of a corporation itself, but that's just as bad a backer given how market fluctuations and trade operations can make that change rather unpredictably even in medium term. Why express the value of each and every one of those (hundreds of trillions of dollars worth of) indivisible stocks, bonds, assets and whatnot merely in caveman-like terms of their value relative to one another rather than standarizing prices in terms of a mediator currency that facilitates their quantification?
If you had bothered to read the description past the part about fiat currencies you would have noticed that I wrote that the corporations did find a way not to have completely baseless currency and partially anchored it to an antimatter bullion.
How did I imply that things are worse because governments are gone? How is a society with enormous structured privately-owned corporations that own private militaries and have territorial jurisdiction and law even close to an anarchy?
π: 1 β©: 0
HeinzHoerler [2014-02-03 01:59:51 +0000 UTC]
a true Capital shipΒ
www.deviantart.com/art/moving-β¦
π: 0 β©: 0
canuleyo [2013-02-18 17:56:50 +0000 UTC]
I have the same concept but for a sea ship fortress that totally replaces a fleet, and even hold aircrafts and ships inside her.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to canuleyo [2013-02-18 20:30:18 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. This one holds ships within it too, though it's mostly "small" stuff like patrol/rescue/firefighting boats and superyachts, as well as some civilian and utility aircraft. Certainly doesn't replace a fleet though
π: 0 β©: 1
canuleyo In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-02-18 23:26:50 +0000 UTC]
Mine was like bewteen 7 or 12 kilometers long It holds actual warships like cruisers, etc. An aircarrier looks small
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to canuleyo [2013-02-19 13:59:42 +0000 UTC]
Sounds familiar, did you ever draw it?
π: 0 β©: 1
canuleyo In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-02-20 01:58:46 +0000 UTC]
Nah, but it's a very popular concept nowadays. I dreamt with it, but I guess I wasn't the only one XD
But there was a concept for a 20 km spaceship. Kinda like the guild starcruiser from Dune.
π: 0 β©: 0
SoFDMC [2013-01-19 09:32:40 +0000 UTC]
Great concept. It will need to be wary of stormy seas, a ship that long will need to flex on stormy oceans with waves like moving mountains.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to SoFDMC [2013-01-19 13:28:50 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, it needs to flex a lot given its lenght like tanker ships, it's probably too slow to outrun or go around any storm that might approach, it just slowly crawls towards whatever the sea throws at it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Chief-Darunia [2013-01-19 02:14:58 +0000 UTC]
Holy crap, this is amazing!! Have you thought about where it would pull in (if necessary) for stores and repairs and whatnot? Also, why go with a Forrestal class? I love this!
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Chief-Darunia [2013-01-19 02:20:09 +0000 UTC]
It's too big to fit anywhere, so it has to be repaired by ships while at sea. It's ressupplied both by cargo ships and by aircraft landing on the big runway on top of it.
The carrier is a Forrestal given that bigger carriers like Nimitzes and Fords are already operated by other, larger corporations, and comissioning a new carrier would be monstrously expensive. So they simply got their hands on a remotorized nuclear Forrestal, seeing how it was good enough for what they wanted to do anyways.
Thanks a lot for the comment
π: 1 β©: 1
Chief-Darunia In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-20 04:12:17 +0000 UTC]
Ah, ok! I would think that with spending so much money on such a big vessel, they wouldn't be too bothered with the cost of good escort vessels.
π: 0 β©: 0
Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-18 18:03:48 +0000 UTC]
Wow, your corporation universe is quite disturbing I must admit, but also very well thought through.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-18 18:07:08 +0000 UTC]
Disturbing in what sense? Just curious. Thanks for the feedback tho
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-18 18:28:52 +0000 UTC]
Well, you know, I don't really like the 'Profit above everything' attitude most big companies have nowawdays. I see it as something horrible if they would take over the world.
Just curious, what did trigger the collapse of the nations in your universe? And what coorporations dominate Europe? Guess Volkswagen or what developed from it is a big player. ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-19 02:15:16 +0000 UTC]
The fall of nations is intentionally left vague to kinda emphatize the distance that the corporate regime has put between itself and the nations of old; they've pretty much erased them from history. Though it's certain that the corporations themselves didn't do it, they merely filled the power void left after a global chemical for unknown causes pretty much eradicated the old regime. Multinational corporations, being descentralized and posessing huge logistical and communications networks, managed the crisis much better than the governments, who had suffered such horrific casualties that they effectively ceased to function. Ever since, the world has been handed down from corporations to corporations.
So much time has passed that none of our current corporations remain, having long been driven out of business or acquired by bigger corporations. Europe is one of the four biggest corporate power bastions on the world (alongside the Pearl River Delta, the Great Lakes, Japan and the Korean peninsula), controlled by thousands of different corporations. The biggest one and the one that generally sways the smaller groups is a gigantic aerospace/software/precision manufacture conglomerate simply known as "Neuropa".
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 09:00:03 +0000 UTC]
So, is this world then an Orwellian one, with little freedom to the individual, and lots of opression and people disappearing that try to establish a more fair system, if it is remembered at all? I guess many corporations are in a permanent state of war against each other to gain the upper hand.
And how could a chemical erradicate all governments of thw world, I could guess maybe of one continent but not an entire planet. Is there maybe a little Mars-colony of America and Russia left, the last remnants of democracy in the Sol-System?
Which year by our time count is the world of your pics in, somwhere in the 26th century?
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-19 14:00:33 +0000 UTC]
It isn't really Orwellian, in fact if anything it's a very anarchistic world. The corporations don't have one single unified government type and most of them lack the capacity (or the will) to monitor or oppress their citizens' individually. The "government" of any given place is merely the sum of all administrative clauses of the corporations that operate in the area, so it can be anything. Given the lack of national borders or any kind of regulation on travel, you can pretty much go anywhere you like. Also given the lack of governments, pretty much everything is legal. Do drugs, drive at 200mph on a highway, have relations with whoever you want, walk on the middle of the street in the nude, make shock art, open a gambling den on your house, carry out human pharmaceutical testing, do anything that doesn't threaten corporate rule and they won't care. Now, if you start going off about how you're gonna bring the corporations down and establish democracy, you will sooner or later disappear without a trace.
Alternatively you could go to a place the corporations haven't established their rule in; territories that are either so inhospitable or so devoid of resources that no one has any interest in there, and corporations generally don't care about what goes on there. So those underdevelopped, disease-ridden areas may be rife with fugitives, warlords, gunmen and terrorist organizations but it's also home to many short-lived countries and empires of many different forms, which usually end up being bombed by corporate armies when they become a threat.
War between corporations isn't what you'd expect despite their large ammounts of firepower. It isn't massive all-out confrontations between organized armies like in the 20th and 21st centuries, but rather descentralized, completely irregular wars without any fronts or major positions, where you never know where will enemy fire come from. Corporations will focus on subterfuge, hiding and asymmetric tactics; and their goal is as much to destroy enemy materiel as it is to keep a positive public opinion, so they bring in lots of press agencies alongside their forces and try to have the least impact possible on the civilian population. They will also hide reconaissance and ambush elements admist the civilian population, so corporate war is a slow, grinding effort. Every now and then, they carry out conventional operations like armored offensives or air campaigns, especially on large open areas not inhabited by many civilians, but those are few compared to the large ammounts of irregular operations. While wars usually don't last more than a month, there's many of them going on at any given moment. Compare that to the 1984 perpetual war whose goal was the creation of a foreign enemy and dstruction of the countries' own materiel.
As for the chemicals, it was a war, so the chemical agents were directly delivered to the major population centers of all major warring factions. The resulting mass death and contamination made the food supply of the world collapse. The corporations then came in and began the restructuring efforts.
There's no enclaves or colonies or any type outside of Earth, the reasons are explained in this deviation [link]
As to how long have the corporations ruled over Earth, it's left vague since the corporations themselves cover that fact up, though it's well in the millenia.
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 22:11:44 +0000 UTC]
Would you say that it is a better world with most parts of the world in an utter state of anarchy? I mean, every society needs rules and government that works for the people, if even just halfhearted like today or otherwise they would destroy themselves, that is my opinion.
But when the agents where sprayed over all major population centers weren't the corporations affected too, with their leadership wiped out just like the political elite?
It somehow saddens me that people wouldn't know anything about their past, it sounds that people are just living an ignorant life, just living day by day.
It is an interesting scenario, but I hope it will never come true.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-19 22:19:10 +0000 UTC]
Hm, I wouldn't say it is necesarily better or worse than the current state of affairs; just different for good or bad. Granted, there's still a modicum of law in the form of the corporations, after all they don't want people randomly murdering their consumer base and making their domains unsafe. As far as large structures of power, though, the citizens are free to do whatever except threaten the corporations.
And yeah, the corporate leadership was also wiped out alongside the political elite, but the logistical networks of the corporations and lower echelons of the chain of command did survive due to either isolation or being on hardened sites, and quickly linked up with one another again, after all that's what they were designed for. Like real multinational corporations, they can easily survive the deaths of its individual members.
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 22:33:52 +0000 UTC]
Wow....how many people are there still left at all? And which nations did trigger that collapse?
I somehow doubt that this would happen irl, since also a lot of governments would have hardened sites, that they would be in a case of war. To me a more logical war would be that a certain number of coproration are able to take over certain parts of the world and fight against the remnants of the governments left.
As I said, a really intersting scenario but also quite disturbing.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-19 22:44:53 +0000 UTC]
So much time has passed that the population has recovered and surpassed ours, now they're stuck at 11 billion people since the corporations have installed quite a bunch of mass population control methods to keep the population stable and further destroy any semblance of historical purpose.
As for the nations, obviously they had hardened sites and their governments survived the initial strikes rather than everyone getting dropped instantly. However, after coming out of their bomb shelters and other safehouses, leadership of countries came out to find their nations so contaminated that the water was poisonous, chemical vapors were everywhere, crops had been killed and no plantlife would grow. After some time, they pretty much all either starved to death, fled or succumbed to the leftover chemicals. The remnants of the multinational corporations, on the other hand, spanned and were developped in many third world and otherwise unimportant territories, so they had better access to uncontaminated resources and a workforce to rebuild everything. The countries did fight against governments, but it was not the governments of their parent nations but rather the leftovers of whoever administrated their territories.
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 22:52:08 +0000 UTC]
Still, as I said. I wouldn't wanna live in this world. It is too anarchistic, and from the anti-autarian education we know that people go nuts if there aren't rules, and I mean more than just basic rules, and the means to enforce them. And besides, I don't like big multinational corporations anyway. I find them suspicios.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-19 22:54:26 +0000 UTC]
Oh, if you don't like multinational corporations then you'd sure wouldn't like to live in that world, lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 23:41:03 +0000 UTC]
The scenario I made up is that after world-war three, not globally, but a local nuclear war between India and Pakistan, after the war and many more local wars braking out, many businesess and governments around the world wanted to go to the business as usual, despite about 500 million people dying in Asia and Africa by famines , radiation and so forth. This caused a global revolution, not like a communist one, rather like the French Revoltuion. So a lot of heads being chopped off. ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Matthew-Travelmaster [2013-01-20 00:04:33 +0000 UTC]
Oh, interesting, I can imagine what a mess would that cause on the world. What kind of a revolution is it? I mean, like the French revolution in terms of how brutal it was or in terms of what it brought about? i.e. democracy or a new form of government
π: 0 β©: 1
Matthew-Travelmaster In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-20 14:23:33 +0000 UTC]
Well...it is complicated. It all started with the 2. economic crisis in 2014, when several large banks in the US collapsed and the global ecnomy was dragged down again, this time even worse, though especially the US were hit hard. So to compensate this, the US started exporting weapons, since it was one of the few industries left inside the US that could stil produce on a large scale.
The sold pretty much everything to anyone who wanted it, nations in central and southern asia, some african and latin-american ones, but a lot of stuff landed in Pakistan and India. The two nations were not at good terms at this time. And because these weapons sales started the second cold war, this time it was a three-party war, the US vs China vs Russia.
Eventually the war turned hot, but it started in Pakistan and India, because of a severe drought and a quadrupling of prices fro fertilizers, so prices for food worldwide sky-rocketed. This caused several hundred thousand people along the Pakistani-Indian border to flee their homes and move somewhere else, but somehow one or several groups, there are no prooves how it all started, seems to have crossed the border without noticing it and the other side started shooting.
Within just four days the war turned nuclear, when India launched an pre-emptive strike against an Pakistani tank-division on Pakistani soil, which Pakistan promply retaliated. In a time-span of about two hours about 150 million people died from the nuclear exchange.
Luckily and unknown to nearly every nation in the world, the EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, South Africa and Brasil have built an orbital network of battle-satellites, each one armed with two chemical lasers that can be used against nuclear missiles. It was originally meant to shoot down American, Russian and CHinese ICBMs in case the cold war between the three powers would turn hot and pretty much all these nations would have ended between them and as battlegrounds.
In order to prevent that they built that network, which was able to shoot down every nuclear missile of India and Pakistan. Unfortunately they were not built to shoot down nuclear bomber-jets or cruise missiles so a lot of nukes still found their targets.
In the end to prevent more bloodshed, the UN-security council members threated to launch their own nuclear missiles against both nations if they wouldn't agree to a cease fire immediately, and to enforce their words each nation launched a single nuclear missile and exploded them in the gulf of Aden in a hight of 10 kilometers, and the threat worked. But the destruction of large parts of India has caused global damage, since many corporations have built their servers in Indian cities that have been nuked, so a large part of several important global companies have been destroyed, which caused even more problems in Africa, where entire nations simply ceased to exist.
But before even the first problems in Africa started to arise the problems in Europe got worse because the USA are furious about that their closest allies have built this network to shoot down their own ICBMs, so they demanded their own share of the network, which the PODSS (Planetary Orbital Defensive Satellite System) members declined of course. It got even worse when rogue generals and admirals of the US armed forced started an sneak attack which submarine-fired cruise missiles and stealth fighters (F22s and F35s) on all major capitals in Europe, hoping to destroy the command posts of the PODSS, but if failed. The EU nations expected something like this to happen (although they thought it would be the US government itself and not rogue forces) and were able to defeat them, and capture all US-military bases in Europe in about 17 minutes and also defend Canada from an US invasion, which is also the reason why this conflict is called '17-minute-war'.
But this conflict was not even finished when suddenly Russia invaded the Caucasus and the Balitc states in an attempt to re-establish the USSR, but that failed too because for some reason this time the Russian people started to rebell, not wanting to start another war, and by accident a Speznaz member used a RVX (Russian VX) shell, (the soldier was colour blind, he had been able to hide this from his commander and thought the RVX shell who was labeled with a red colour was a CS-gas shell, which was labeled green), which killed several ten-thousand people in moscow and since some people had been able to broadcast it live on the Internet, people started rebelling all over Russia against the authorities, also the armed forces, especially the younger ones retreated from the nations in the Baltic and the Caucasus and turned back and started fighting against the goverment.
The Russian president then fled with loyal forces, together with the most advanced weaponry and about 30 nukes to Belarus where he established an authoritarian state together with the Belorussian elite.
In Russia on the other hand, exactly 100 years after the revolution in 1917, the people were able to defeat the government and also the oligarchs and establisha true democracy, with a little bit help from Europe, after they had their revolutions in 2018. Imagine it like the younger Russians against eh elderlies from the former USSR, who tries to rebuilt the old communist days.
Then there was a small skirmish along the Chinese-Russian border but that was short beucase the EU used their orbital lasers to melt the tank-armies of the PRC to slag.
So, with about half of India and Pakistan destroyed, Russia reforming, China plunging into civil war, Africa starving, and Latin-America on an unstable course and the US even more paranoid then ever, the surviving international-companies either tried to take over entire nations or asked for compensation because of the loss of business during the wars and conflicts.
This finally caused the people to snap out, because until then, mid 2018, about 350 million people worldwide have died and the starving in Africa has just yet started, people started to rebell against pretty much anybody, corrupt politicians and lazy civil servant, greedy CEOs and oligarchs and so on. About 90 % of the global economical elite was lynched by mobs right on the streets, and each nation had different traditions to kill people like them, pyres in Italy, guillotine in France, quartering and shooting squads in several central European nations and so forth. In Frankfurt in Germany for exmaple they set the Main Tower with all the banks in it on fire, as a symbol against a plutocratic elite. Millions were killed right on the spot where they were found. New York City got very famous for their method of killing , here thousands were simply thrown out of their Penthouses and offices in the top floors in their skyscrapers and onto the streets. You can say that the people killed everybody that had more money than is was good for them.
So yeah it was a pretty brutal world revolution. Afterwards, the world-economy was pretty much on the ground. The most urgent thing now was to provide enough food for a starving world population, but it should be done without destroying the last remnants of the global eco-system. So food was rationed, worldwide. If you don't have food stamps, you can't get food, it was that easy. Nations that were able to export food had to share it with those that cannot. Europe and the stable African nations took over controll of the collapsed African and South-Eastern nations, also on the Balkans, and revived the UN Trousteeship council, the office that originally was meant to controll the former colonies until they got independent.
The lives of the people has changed pretty much. Long-distance travel is pretty much non-existant, except for food and certain goods. You can say it is like this: 'Act locally, think globally.' And people finally realized that they had to be permanently aware of what their governing elite is doing, or it would happen again. So many nations established a direct and living democracy, similar like in Switzerland.
So yeah, it is quite a wall of text. ^^
I made a map, so if you got any specific questions just have a look at the map and ask in the comments of the map.
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
TheAstronomicon [2013-01-18 16:44:12 +0000 UTC]
Did you OD doing this? Excellent, just excellent.
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to TheAstronomicon [2013-01-18 18:06:31 +0000 UTC]
Nah, I just switched to horse
π: 0 β©: 0
Pixel-pencil [2013-01-18 13:03:13 +0000 UTC]
Dude! You've been unstoppable with this stuff! They just keep getting better!
π: 0 β©: 1
VoughtVindicator In reply to Pixel-pencil [2013-01-19 02:06:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot, really appreciate it coming from you
π: 0 β©: 1
Pixel-pencil In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-19 02:24:43 +0000 UTC]
You're too kind
π: 0 β©: 0
Lord-Inu-Hanyou [2013-01-18 11:52:41 +0000 UTC]
-throws money at screen- NOTHING IS HAPPENING! I WANT!
π: 0 β©: 2
Lord-Inu-Hanyou In reply to VoughtVindicator [2013-01-20 09:40:24 +0000 UTC]
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
π: 0 β©: 0
Airrider1 In reply to Lord-Inu-Hanyou [2013-01-18 13:45:30 +0000 UTC]
Don't do THAT, there's ANTIMATTER on there!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>