HOME | DD

Published: 2009-02-14 23:55:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 16183; Favourites: 143; Downloads: 537
Redirect to original
Description
SPECIAL: Self PropElled CupId effect ArtiLlery.The SPECIAL, or "Stud" as it is alternatively known, like all matters of the heart, is a story of compromises.
Early attempts to field the Cupid Effect Ray Emitter were met with limited success.
It was discovered that the effect of the ray, while completely enthralling, was not lasting. Often, those influenced by the beam had reacquired their baseline disposition within minutes of initial exposure.
It was then thought that a CERE Seeker could restrain a target damsel, once she had wandered into its optimum area of engagement. However, carrying neutralization gear in addition to the equipment required to produce a medium to long range Cupid Effect proved to be mutually exclusive tasks.
Eventually FMP development decided to try and extend the duration of theCupid Effect Ray as well as its effective radius. The result was an energy hungry array that was simply too heavy and bulky to be carried by anything resembling a maneuvering platform; but it would entice lovestruck enemy combatants from hundreds of yards beyond visual range. (In fact, there was even discussion at this phase of rechristening the device, "Pied Piper Ray".)
The increased range and effectiveness of this new heavy emitter made it an ideal candidate for the role of self propelled artillery.
Stationed in the rear of armored "recruitment columns" SPECIALS would destabilize organized resistance from a safe distance, and make the jobs of more active, front line Seeker units much easier, as any damsels they'd encounter while the beam is in operation would become suddenly, and exceedingly cooperative.
Since a damsel, of any power level becomes geometrically less inclined to harm a Stud with increased proximity. it was deemed unnecessary to outfit them with the light, nigh-invulnerable neutronium, adamantium, and depleated Kyptonite alloys that armor the smaller, faster TTS's. Hence, tons of conventional Chobum armor protect the SPECIAL's, adding to their already intimidating size and weight. (And earning their affectionate nickname.)
The conventional armor and lackluster titanium framework renders a SPECIAL exceedingly vulnerable on during recruitment drives. In fact, the mighty super-heroine adjacent to the Stud pictured here could easily pulverize it beyond repair with a single blow, were she not repeating to herself the phrase "Mrs. Carol Danvers-SPECIAL" over and over again.
Big, vulnerable, and only just fast enough to keep pace with an armored recruitment drive, the SPECIAL is mainly "special" in the fact that it's the product of so many design concessions but still proves to be effective at its assigned task.
Related content
Comments: 160
we-r-nomad In reply to amygagged [2009-02-15 15:00:38 +0000 UTC]
You're not the first person to mention that. Maybe I should send them my portfolio.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Night-Miner [2009-02-15 02:38:56 +0000 UTC]
Oh wow, this is gorgeous ^^
Love the SPECIAL, body shape reminds me of the small tanks of the Imperium of Man from 40K but your chaise looks cooler
It's an absolutely marvellous idea ^^
Can't wait to see what becomes of Mary Marvel
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ps1980 In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 01:37:43 +0000 UTC]
Hooray for Ms. Marvel!
I hope we will see more of her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to ps1980 [2009-02-15 01:49:18 +0000 UTC]
Good eye.
I always liked her. Ever since I first saw her wayyy back in Marvel Team-Up # 62!
And yes. You will see more of her.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
timthecat In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 19:29:51 +0000 UTC]
MTU 62?
Dude your dateing yourself here, that was the pre Cockrum costum.
Takes me wwwaaaayy back, I won't say how long if you don't.
timthecat out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to timthecat [2009-02-15 20:38:50 +0000 UTC]
Dude, you're dating yourself as well.
You know who Dave Cockrum is!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
timthecat In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-16 00:44:11 +0000 UTC]
Dude,
No I Know who Dave Cockrum Was, RIP Mr. Cockrum.
Damn those are some big shoes to fill.
timthecat out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to timthecat [2009-02-16 01:49:34 +0000 UTC]
Yea, I was thinking I should have typed "was."
He'll always have my respect for being the one mainstream artist who bothered to get his aircraft and technical art right, decades before "google image search" was available.
Even now, when references are just a click away, entirely too many people don't bother to do their research. The ridiculous aeronautic bastardizations that the X-Men insist upon calling Blackbirds, stand as stark testimony to what we've lost with the passing of such an artist as Cockrum.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
timthecat In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-16 02:50:11 +0000 UTC]
Yeah,
Talking to you I Googled him and found out about his passing.
Jeeezzzz, I feel like an idiot. He was one of the people that inspired me to pursue art. I dunno man I feel that the wolrd is a little sadder for me. Sorry about being a downer, just well dare I say it, I feel sad about this.
sorry again.
timthecat out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to timthecat [2009-02-16 20:48:44 +0000 UTC]
Air through the engine man, no need to beat yourself up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hacker90 In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 01:26:12 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of a Russian Tunguska significantly. Only thing that is missing are some metal pipes connecting each gun, otherwise it is a Tunguska. Are these beams defying the laws of physics in some way? Since you say beam, they can't angle unless something does it for them. Perhaps Cupid cannisters or shells?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 01:44:52 +0000 UTC]
I wish!
I had not seen a Tunguska until your comment here inspired me to check out Wikipedia.
Man that thing is cool lookin'! I wish I had known to check it out so I could get ideas.
For instance, all those what I'll assume are TOW canisters it has mounted along its turret. Perfect placement for mortar style strait-jacket launchers.
I'm probably going to have to design a more weapon laden self propelled gun, now that I've seen this.
As for the guns. They are protruding from rectangular ports on the turret, and hence can be selective angled. Any suggestion on how I could make it more obvious they aren't flush-mounted on the turret's surface would be appreciated.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 02:20:57 +0000 UTC]
I wouldn't qualify myself as a person to give advice on such things. Though, the straitjacket launchers or potential variants remind me of that Ghost in the Sheath image (first one). Was see an unfortunate beta test victim of those?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 02:27:20 +0000 UTC]
I hadn't thought of that being the result of strait jacketed shell impact, but now that you mention it, that is an awesome idea!
Might call it a GOWN round instead though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 02:50:19 +0000 UTC]
A GOWN round is a catchy name for that. On that note, I've been wondering but heard nothing back on this. Could you offer a higher resolution version of that image? Feels a little small.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 04:16:15 +0000 UTC]
I'd have to find the original first. I scanned the GOWN'ed Yoko picture at 72dpi.
So if it turns up, sure.
More thoughts on the Gown Round.
It seems to me to be a hit-or-miss weapon; either wrapping a woman in a nice tight, figure-flattering sheath, (Complete with a gag and pumps!)or flying off uselessly to adorn whatever hapless tree, boulder or vertical column it should strike along the way.
GR's can't loiter around a battlefield, looking for targets of opportunity, like RTD's, so rather than hanging upon the miniature hard-point discs of Seekers or the launching silos of TTS's; GR's would be auto-fired by reciprocating machine-gun style cannon. GOWN GUNS!
(Gattling GOWN's?)
Hence the battle fields would probably be littered with shiny sheathed phone poles, street lamps, park benches, fence posts, and trees; but there would be helpless hotties squirming among them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
SuichiTanaka In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 10:42:03 +0000 UTC]
I know exactly what you can base the gown round off of.
[link]
Take one of the silliest moments in comic related history and turn it into something epic. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to SuichiTanaka [2009-02-15 13:23:27 +0000 UTC]
Ha, only this would be more targeted at Ursa, and it definitely wouldn't magically fade away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
timthecat In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 06:06:18 +0000 UTC]
If you included a seeker/smart guided sysetem. much like what is used on bombloads. Sorta a big ole tape buddy. but with a bigger tank for the smart materals contained therein.
timthecat out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to timthecat [2009-02-15 14:50:05 +0000 UTC]
Precision munitions eh? "One shot, one thrill."
I have to admit that is incredibly logical and efficient, and very much in keeping with the TOW style delivery system that was discussed somewhere along this thread. (I think.)
I'm a little disappointed, as I was growing attached to the mental image of TTS's and SPECIAL's with Gatling type mounts bolted to their turrets, hosing down a battlefield in a Latex Storm.
Oh well, I'll get over it. For one thing, the TOW GOWN Round would save me the trouble of having to draw latex coated trees.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
timthecat In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-16 01:22:36 +0000 UTC]
Well they may be Smart rounds but, how smart are they? So you can expect a few - ah - incidents.
Sides, how big are they bad boys?
The difference is how big are they? Say, you got Three sizes. Say a Peanut, a Sausage, and a Large Bread stick. All could have limited Grav system and a reservoir of smart materials for the mission.
I see these as a mini drones as opposed to a standard gun round. While the up front cost is high they do come back (Most of the time) and the need for a large base of production is reduced.
Well just a thought
timthecat out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to timthecat [2009-02-16 02:24:25 +0000 UTC]
I mentioned somewhere that there could be specialized grenade rounds like those use for an M-203 or a combat shotgun. These could be among the variety of shells used for such a weapon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-16 21:21:40 +0000 UTC]
Latex Fragmentation Grenade or LFG, is the new premier weapon in development at H90 industries. Guaranteed to bring down any unfortunate victim in one blast. Thanks to our revolutionary breakthrough utilizing the latest in Self-Replicating Latex or SLR for short. SLR is based on nanobot technology that eats away at the victims clothing. Turning their own protection into their sealed fate.
H90 industry operators are standing by to take orders from our usual client.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-16 21:55:19 +0000 UTC]
The clothes eating function is the real selling point here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-16 22:00:15 +0000 UTC]
I thought you would appreciate that part. Helps sell the product and explain how small blobs expand on the victim.
I made a 2nd post with the correct acronym. I hate it when a typo slips by like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hacker90 In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-16 21:29:16 +0000 UTC]
Latex Fragmentation Grenade or LFG, is the new premier weapon in development at H90 industries. Guaranteed to bring down any unfortunate victim in one blast. Thanks to our revolutionary breakthrough utilizing the latest in Self-Replicating Latex or SRL for short. SRl is based on nanobot technology that eats away at the victims clothing. Turning their own protection into their sealed fate.
H90 industry operators are standing by to take orders from our usual client.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 04:35:57 +0000 UTC]
A higher res version of Yoko is sweet, but I was mentioning this beauty > [link] .
I could imagine a Gown round being useful for special forces use. Would be hard to avoid that round in a hallway at some bunker. Nomad trains former special forces gals into his own private army to go forth and obtain! Revy from Black Lagoon is a good target for a Gown round, maybe something sexier.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 14:53:53 +0000 UTC]
Same sitch with the Makoto pic. Same sitch with any drawing over 90 days old.
Hmmm, someone suggested an expanding foam round for such close quarters situations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
we-r-nomad In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 15:12:04 +0000 UTC]
I just realized we were talking about two different effects when discussing the GOWN Round.
The picture you really were discussing was of an actual straitjacket as opposed to the full body sheath I was imagining.
Still, I suppose both could be used, it's just a matter of determining which round would be used in which situation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 16:19:53 +0000 UTC]
A potential docile victim gets the sheath and someone wiley like the major gets the jacket.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 17:09:51 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, I respectfully disagree.
A docile victim, who can be made to walk to a damsel containment unit under her own power, would be allowed, however momentarily, to show off her gams.
Someone like the Major who could use her limited mobility to escape at high speed, while detonating intercepting Seekers and RTD's with fierce cybernetic kicks would warrant a full sheath.
Once Motoko's fitted with a Hacking Collar overwriting her voluntary muscle control--then you can make wit' da straitjacket.
The greater the probability of attempted escape, the greater the restriction and coverage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 17:22:05 +0000 UTC]
Fully sheathed?! You mean the Motoko entirely covered from bow to stern wiggling about?!
Hurry then! We must not keep the fan boys waiting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 17:41:52 +0000 UTC]
And here I was thinking you'd object to the idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 17:47:52 +0000 UTC]
Object?! Only weakness I have is seeing my favorite girls sheathed over! We need to get you motivated on that ASAP!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 15:01:49 +0000 UTC]
Curious, why did you spell her name Makoto?
Expanding foam? Wouldn't that muck up all the sexiness of a restrained damsel in that situation? Get a modified net shootin' gunz with electrified net options. That'll take the fight out of them right quick!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 15:22:31 +0000 UTC]
Typo. It happens.
You have a point concerning the foam. The whole goal of recruitment is to show off the figures of the "impressees" as much, and as soon as possible. A weapon that obscures their features is therefore counter productive.
Still, I like to entertain all ideas before I accept or reject them. And many borderline concepts can be salvaged. Say that instead of foam, the round coated everyone within a confined space, like a tank turret or bomber cockpit in nice shiny latex?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
SuichiTanaka In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 22:21:49 +0000 UTC]
How about a hybrid of both ideas? What about a military grade restraint foam that's able to launched in a clump from the barrel of a specially designed cannon. This allows for a controlled area of impact as well as efficient "gumming up" of vehicles and gear, as you couldn't effectively propel a liquid alone. When the sticky foam hits the air, it begins to oxidize and expel it's water, shrinking considerably. The end result is a far more condensed and tough film that's left once the process finishes. Since the material would self-contract, it would attempt to pull all the area it's adhered to, together into a writhing mass of sticky film.
This should in effect serve as both anti-vehicle and anti-personnel ammunition. It would gum up gears, drive shafts and any delicate equipment, as well as sheathing sweet damsels in form fitting films wherever it might hit them. I suppose it'd be a combination of Spider-Man webshooters and Shrinky-Dinks.
It lacks the finesse of an SJ gun or a RTD, but it has much potential as a consumable ammunition and ordinance for large scale ground warfare. All it would take is a small explosive core set into a large 'round' of the foam and you could make effective flak as well. The stuff would be ridiculously adapt for ruining jet turbines and intake valves.
It might even make standard firearm technology somewhat useful as a non-lethal capture technology. Imagine peppering an enemy with a hail of foam bullets from a SAW or a minigun (minigum? ) and watching the target's limbs start to collapse inwards as the material shrinks and expels it's water content, imploding her into a tight package. ;3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hacker90 In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 15:37:38 +0000 UTC]
I can see it now, some poor gal in a disabled tank getting a latex round through the eye sight. There is more than armor and aircraft in a damsel seeking army. Where are your commando robots at? Tanks and aircraft can't penetrate underground bunkers easily.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to hacker90 [2009-02-15 15:53:03 +0000 UTC]
You might wish to check out the discussion I have going with further along this thread. We begin to start touching upon that very subject. Your input would be welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kite-san In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 01:10:57 +0000 UTC]
ooooh. now that's a big, long, hard, throbbing cannon.
or maybe it just induces the throbbing. either way, lovely fun ^.^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to kite-san [2009-02-15 01:19:01 +0000 UTC]
And it drives the ladies wild.
Can a double entendre be so blatant that it becomes a single?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kite-san In reply to we-r-nomad [2009-02-15 06:28:07 +0000 UTC]
as long as it's not a quadruple entendre. british naval history references make me seasick.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
renderedspeechless In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 00:39:07 +0000 UTC]
The cartoonish look of the damsel is dynamite: Love her hair! And the gushing is very well portrayed. But the SPECIAL tank is brilliant. Your drafting skills are superb. Reminiscent of Geoff Darrow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to renderedspeechless [2009-02-15 01:28:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
'Couse, If I was Darrow, there'd be 506 patterned rivets running along the Special's outer hull.
And there'd be 79 more SPECIAL's, and every single woman in the Marvel universe would be ravaging the intricately rendered landscape in order to get to them.
And in the second panel...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bound-nicole-babe78 In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 00:33:08 +0000 UTC]
That is just wrong on soooo many levels. But then again, I guess love is a battlefield.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
we-r-nomad In reply to bound-nicole-babe78 [2009-02-15 00:46:11 +0000 UTC]
I loves me sum Pat Benetar!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JohnnyPitstain In reply to ??? [2009-02-15 00:27:00 +0000 UTC]
That is something I would to see my taxes go into!! Hell, I wanna see it in action.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>