HOME | DD

Published: 2012-10-21 14:10:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 3852; Favourites: 85; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description
Fonts by Cyberella (accidentally credited her as Cyberela, please ignore.)Related content
Comments: 83
wizfrikiman In reply to ??? [2013-11-10 06:22:29 +0000 UTC]
Haha, yeah. I do have a certain soft spot for rainbow designs, even though most look horrible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wizfrikiman In reply to PhoenixGR [2013-09-14 00:41:51 +0000 UTC]
Okay, but it's still a funky, amateurish font that's 100% NOT for serious graphic designs. Unless you're Lamb of God.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PhoenixGR In reply to wizfrikiman [2013-09-21 16:49:59 +0000 UTC]
stamata na kollas stis leptomeries re wiz, xalarwse!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
InoriAizawa [2013-03-12 00:14:29 +0000 UTC]
I hate when serious businesses use Papyrus as a font.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ftourini [2013-02-21 10:04:45 +0000 UTC]
and don't forget kids the awesome WORDART font choices! [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to ftourini [2013-02-21 22:39:14 +0000 UTC]
Exactly, the silver "this" was meant to be a jab at WordArt. The funny thing is, I actually used the WordArt equivalent in OpenOffice to make it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OliveAndrews [2012-12-22 00:49:29 +0000 UTC]
Kinda thought the lens flare 'this' was alright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to OliveAndrews [2012-12-22 04:20:34 +0000 UTC]
It can look good when used in a smart way, but, then again, the standard lens flare Photoshop provides is a definite example of designer laziness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to zanate-pirata [2012-12-12 06:35:51 +0000 UTC]
I didn't. Read the very last sentence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zanate-pirata In reply to wizfrikiman [2013-01-17 23:19:27 +0000 UTC]
My apologies, you are right, I didn't saw it. Great work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Cirque-D-Husky [2012-10-25 19:08:37 +0000 UTC]
all of those fonts literally made my eyes hurt. >.<
why oh why would people use such painful looking fonts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to Cirque-D-Husky [2012-11-06 02:33:37 +0000 UTC]
Probably due to laziness, lack of knowledge and/or taste. Thanks for the comment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
miissevil [2012-10-23 19:17:10 +0000 UTC]
absolute correct ! except for on listed #2 "this" ... in my opinion, it's really depend on what kind company.. more likely recommend to avoid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to miissevil [2012-12-20 12:16:20 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, a little bit of "twisted" text won't hurt, as long as you don't overdo it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
misunderheard [2012-10-23 16:01:51 +0000 UTC]
Comic Sans is for old people who dont know and think its cute
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bandeau [2012-10-22 23:45:47 +0000 UTC]
HAH! I recently wrote an article for Hub about designing book covers, and dedicated a section just to tell people not to use Papyrus. I love this! Papyrus and lens flare, two of my all time pet peeves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Veztaro [2012-10-22 20:20:25 +0000 UTC]
Hehe. I like this tutorial! but I've got to say that the logo of Avatar (the movie) uses Papyrus
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to Veztaro [2012-10-22 21:23:26 +0000 UTC]
Yeah! And the Na'Vi subtitles, too. It was so cheesy (and suited the movie, too).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VelkynKarma [2012-10-22 16:13:28 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha. Oooh papyrus. You and Comic sans are the scourge of the typeface world.
~VelkynKarma
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to VelkynKarma [2012-12-02 21:31:19 +0000 UTC]
Tell me about it. Thanks for the comment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KrisCynical [2012-10-22 15:25:25 +0000 UTC]
What about Comic Sans? Is it such a given that it doesn't need to be mentioned? lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to KrisCynical [2012-10-22 21:19:14 +0000 UTC]
What do you mean? I did mention it at the end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KrisCynical In reply to wizfrikiman [2012-10-23 09:08:25 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see it now. It looks kind of similar to the font the rest of the sentence is in when it's all black, so I missed it. I guess I was just surprised that Papyrus took a larger no-no spot than Comic Sans.
I think Scriptina is starting to head in that direction, too, unfortunately. I'm starting to have twitchy reactions every time I see something that is written entirely in Scriptina... I'll rarely use it for capital letters only while the rest of the word is in a different font which seems to get positive reactions from clients, but other than that it seems like badly spaced overkill.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to KrisCynical [2012-11-26 12:19:10 +0000 UTC]
I had no idea about Scriptina but it doesn't really look like a pretty good font.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtbyGloriaColom [2012-10-22 13:50:19 +0000 UTC]
Learned so much from the tutorial and ensuing comments!! Thanks for sharing... even when I was in middle school many of these effects seemed over hokey!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to ArtbyGloriaColom [2012-10-22 21:22:56 +0000 UTC]
No problem! Glad you found it useful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fedini [2012-10-22 09:25:50 +0000 UTC]
what's wrong with le last one? I can totally see it on a comic book's cover...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to Fedini [2012-10-22 21:22:09 +0000 UTC]
That's all you can do with it, sadly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fedini In reply to wizfrikiman [2012-10-22 21:25:05 +0000 UTC]
oh well, at last is good for comics
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
daremaker [2012-10-22 05:48:39 +0000 UTC]
My HS and college groups were rather fond of all of these
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
startraveller776 [2012-10-22 04:28:17 +0000 UTC]
PAPYRUS FTW, BABY! I'm totally using Papyrus on every design from now on. EVERY. DESIGN.
(And if you believe that, then I've got a bridge for sale.)
I do appreciate that you show not only poor fonts (and font modification), but eye-pain-causing color combinations as well. Color theory matters in graphic design. I go to some fansites and I want to cringe at the color scheme. Oy!
I'm only a hobbyist myself, so I have no claims on being a qualified designer, but I try very hard to do my best. (And I'm always learning.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wizfrikiman In reply to startraveller776 [2012-10-22 05:45:48 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'm a hobbyist too. It's good that you're searching this stuff now. Others call themselves "professionals" after years of studying, er, some stuff, and use Papyrus and bevels everywhere. Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>