HOME | DD
Xiao-Fury β Resist the Devil pt 1
Published: 2013-04-21 04:50:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 2798; Favourites: 8; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description
The WNBA is especially plagued with the spirit of homosexuality.Related content
Comments: 718
So far...I've learned that if a man calls himself a woman, I have to believe him despite him obviously being a male.
In short, you want me to be a deranged liar just to make a mentally ill person feel safe in his mind....yet you laugh at me. I guess it takes all kinds!
Are you a female or a male?
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe you already are a deranged liar. I mean, you said that religious text is somehow more credible than scientific research. And if a person wishes to be called a certain pronoun, what's so bad about that? (I'm going to assume you're female) Would you like it if people called you a 'he' despite telling them that you're female?
I identify as neither male nor female. Inb4 "DER R UNLEE 2 GENDERZZZZZZ!!!11!1!1", non-binary genders have been around since ancient Sumer. Way older than the bible and Christianity have been around.
π: 0 β©: 0
I didn't say it wasn't a mental disorder. Don't you know what sarcasm is?
I said that if it's fine for a man to look in the mirror and say that he's a woman, then it's also fine for an anorexia victim to look in the mirror and say that she's overweight.
Trans people are in DENIAL of their own birth right.
π: 0 β©: 1
And you're in denial of the truth. Stop comparing ones gender identity to a horrible eating disorder that scars people for life.
π: 0 β©: 1
Gender always meant sex, but the LGBT PC activists cried so that they can have a definition that fits their frame of mind.
π: 0 β©: 1
No, gender and sex have always been two different concepts. In America, a lot of people consider them to be the same thing, which is inconsistent with many other countries
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope. It changed only because the PC police decided to make room for people who are gender confused...meaning they can't tell if they are a male or female....which is insanity.
π: 0 β©: 0
Well, it is. Your homo friends do a lot of acting to get their lies across.
π: 0 β©: 1
Homosexuals haven't Β taken your right away to purchase what you want/need, booted you out of your home, thrown you in prison etc etc all because your straight so no you're not being oppressed. You're just being as loud and obnoxious as some of them are. >.>
Lies? What Homosexuals aren't human? 
π: 0 β©: 1
So this explains why churches are being forced to marry them off? Christian bakers are forced to bake cakes for so called gay marriages, and photographers are forced to take pictures at gay so called weddings?
Why women have to remain quiet while men who think they are women waltz into women's facilities?
Why DOMA was pulled down, and how a simple disagreement towards homosexuality is now a hate crime?
Your homo friends probably didn't tell you that much because they are so busy believing that everyone hates them, especially Christians.
π: 0 β©: 1
XD I'm still LOLing. So tell me are the infertile and married Heterosexuals oppressing you as well? Again, that's not oppression.
"Why women have to remain quiet while men who think they are women waltz into women's facilities?" The only real problem and the only decent point you've made but they're called Transsexuals last I checked.
DOMA? Dumbasses of Modern America, a simple disagreement isn't a hate crime but getting violent over it is.
I prefer to lurk instead of listening to what 1 person tells me. XD You Christians do have a book that's pretty fucked up and ignore the fucked up things in it. You'd know this if you weren't so gullible but I can't expect too much from people who believe Harry Potter and Pokemon are Satan's minions of evul. XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Not a single rebuttal in this gibberish response.
π: 0 β©: 1
All because you're soooo oppressheeed.
You're not oppressed just loud and obnoxious.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Laughing and making yourself out to be an idiot doesn't win arguments, but it reveals how stupid a lot of lgbts are.
No wonder so many of them are easily deceived.
Laugh on though.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't follow/praise a book that tells it's followers to kill people who don't believe in God, work on Sunday, are Homosexual, aren't Christian or women who speak their minds and make their own choice who and when to marry. XD
Anyone who believes in God also believes The Tooth Fairy is real.
Oh I am LOLing on.
π: 0 β©: 1
....the bible doesn't say that anyway.
If you're going to argue against my faith, first know what I believe in.
Keep making yourself look like a fool though. You're doing a good job.
π: 0 β©: 1
You haven't read the Old Testament I see. XDΒ
You're a silly Christian living in her own fantasy world, not Β much else to know.
Whatever helps you sleep at night silly.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Nor have you.
You're just one of the many tools who take a s:cripture and fail to understand it.
Let me guess...you're going to tell me that I shouldn't eat shellfish, right?
π: 0 β©: 1
Keep telling yourself that.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkXOwBβ¦
I'm not God or Jesus Christ so if you wanna eat Shellfish go right ahead.
π: 0 β©: 1
I will. And I don't have time to refute all that nonsense on that video.
However, homosexuality is still a sin regardless to how much you don't like it. Stay tuned.
π: 0 β©: 1
Because you haven't A. looked at it B. are in serious denial ( as are most Christians when proven wrong ) and C. Hate being proven wrong. XD
No kidding and all because some imaginary tooth fairy you worship said so because you can't procreate so again, it's no homosexuality you hate but people who can't procreate. 
π: 0 β©: 1
I didn't, and won't. If you want to argue, write it down because I'm not watching that.
Imaginary tooth fairy...again, you mock my faith and don't even know what I believe in.
But yet you laugh at me. I should be the one laughing honestly, but it's kind of pathetic more than funny.
Infertile men and women are not in error. They know that men and women can make children. Homosexuals on the other hand, attempts to go against human nature by trying to fit organs where they don't belong.
Talk about biophobes...
π: 0 β©: 1
Because you don't want to be proven wrong. So yea, there's no point in writing it down. >.>
It's not that hard to figure out you're just another silly Christian who believes in something so disturbing.
Suuure they're not. Homosexuality is just nature's way of minimizing the ( over 7 billion ) Human population. Don't really need anymore kids coming into this world by shitty parents.
No, I'm not terrified of biology.
π: 0 β©: 1
Because you probably didn't watch it either. I'm not going back and forward answering that stuff.
It's disturbing that you know nothing about my faith, yet you're trying so hard to be funny about it. Your laughing icons is a classic sign of "I've got nothing".
Later, kid. I have more important things to do than read your gibberish and lame excuse of debating.
π: 0 β©: 1
Silly Christians and their silliness. XD
π: 0 β©: 0
im not gay, i just like dressing up like a guy. boxers are comfy.
π: 0 β©: 1
There are girl boxer shorts, you know.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah i know. i bought mine in the guys section. they're more loose than the girl ones. i also like to wear my brothers clothes so i guess that makes me gay too.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sounds like the beginning of a bad problem.
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah sure im gonna turn into a gay just for wearing boy clothes brilliant. trust me as much as i support my friends i wont swing that way.
π: 0 β©: 1
It often starts small. For women to wear men clothing already exemplifies an abnormal interest in the opposite sex. This is precisely what is going on in the WNBA.
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do soΒ areΒ abomination unto the LORD thy God (Deut 22:5).
π: 0 β©: 2
Then dont wear pants cause thats originally a mans garment.
Even if its bought in the woman's section it still counts.
π: 0 β©: 1
There are pants for women...there are clothes made for women; therefore, women who cross dress are without excuse.
π: 0 β©: 1
Whats the difference between a woman wearing loose shorts from the men's department and loose shorts from the woman's department. Their basically the same thing. Not like anybody but your precious god (who probably doesn't give a shit) would know. And why is it such a big deal if they wear man's cloths while playing sports? Would you rather girls wear tiny miniskirts and high heals while playing basketball. 
π: 0 β©: 1
Even during those times, there were clothes for both sexes.
Man wrote the bible, but it was inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:16). All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
π: 0 β©: 1
But the thing is pants wasn't one of them. Woman never officially started wearing pants till at LEAST 1960s-1970s. 
Even so what harm is it for me to wear a pair of sports shorts from the men's department for practicality reasons. Again not gonna be playing basketball in a tiny miniskirt. What if I'm working in a job that ruins cloths (watch the show dirty jobs). I'm not gonna care about if my cloths are girly i want the cheepist shit available.Β
Keyword MAN WROTE THE BIBLE! Inspired by god doesn't mean shit. Did you know the movie Cinderella was inspired by the brother's grim version.
Those movies that are inspired by true stories don't stick with the all the facts. Remember the titans that the last foot ball game, the titans won by a landslide. In the movie they barely won.Β
The only way to understand god's words is in nature.
You also need to ask "why." For example yah homosexuality isn't much good for reproduction but actually I think we need more couples who are unable to reproduce so we can force them to adopt. If god hated homosexuality he would have made it so simple to change sexuality that by now we'd have a pill that can do it. But no he made it so complex you need to use unhealthy methods to change your sexuality.
Now then why is it man and woman can physically wear any garment. How come I can easily slip on baggy pants and a t-shirt and my biology makes it easy for me to do so? How is it a man's biology wont interfere with him wearing a dress. If god didn't want us to only wear outfits for our genders he would have purposely made it so our anatomy is so different we would be forced to wear only cloths of our gender cause we couldn't wear anything else.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
But there are female pants.
But now you're mad because you think that the bible is against female clothing, despite that there are female pants for women.Β You can't be satisfied.Β
Man writes your pay checks, but you believe it.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Male pant is both more comfortable and cheeper than female pants. The shorts for sports are more practical for men. And no I dont care about the clothing gender when I want practicality. All female pants are is a male garment with a female lable.
The bible also says I should marry my rapist if im unbethroved. I can quote it from the text for you if you'd wish. Even more stupid your parent get to pick your husband. I can even find the rape quote on christian sites btw.
That isnt the same. The paycheck is mans words claiming o be man's words. The bible is mans words claiming to be gods words.
Jk rowling wrote harry potter. Do you believe in wizards on broomstick?
π: 0 β©: 1
So now you're saying that all female clothing are really for men...lol you're confusing.
So what bible hating troll told you that one?
Man wrote history books that ridicule the bible, and yet you believe it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pants were originally a mans garment dresses were for woman. How do you think woman started wearing pants?
Actually it was a bible promoting site. Here is a link. www.openbible.info/topics/rape second one down.
The history book is backed up by evidence. Evolution has fossils to back them up. We still yet to find the garden of eden. The checks have electronic records. I still yet to discover jesus walking on water. Even the big bang theory has some evidence. .
π: 0 β©: 1
So now you're angry that there are women pants...
So did you actually...read the scripture you just gave me?
π: 0 β©: 1
No not I just find somebody t hypocritical of society to say woman can wear pants but men cannot wear dress and you for not following one part of the bible but ignoring another.
Actually yes but I cannot email you a bible now can I? And I cannot send u the page its in I need links.
π: 0 β©: 1
Totally forget that there are clothes for both genders....
Copy and paste these scriptures to me. I assure you that it doesn't say what most people commonly believe.
π: 0 β©: 1
And yet you throw a fit about these gender nuetral cloths aka sports wear in your picturem
www.openbible.info/topics/rape
I gave you a link. Click the link
.
"If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found, then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her all his days."
Yup that says I must marry my rapist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Why didn't you include the chapter and verse? Because had you did, you would have read the scriptures in order...
25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.
26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter: (Deut 22).
Verse 25 and 26 clearly demonstrates a rape scenario.
The scripture you gave demonstrates an act of fornication, which was punishable by those laws...which are old covenant laws, but you people think that Christians live by the Law.
π: 0 β©: 1
26 shows a rape scenario for a betrothed woman. In ancient times betrothed meant to be engaged or married. Unbethroved means not engaged nor married.
You either follow the entire bible or dont bother. Picking and choosing what to follow then whining about people not following a part is hypocritical.
π: 0 β©: 1
I did...
I gave you Deute?ronomy 22:25-26.
Those are the scriptures about a woman who was raped. The scripture you gave did not mention rape.
Read in context. It will save you from sounding like the typical bible hater.
π: 0 β©: 1
If a man seizes a woman and lies with her......thats rape idiot. Idc how you couldn't translate that to anything besides rape. Please tell me how seizing and laying with somebody is not rape. Please enlighten me.
So I cant dislike the bible? Im not the one shaming people cause they didnt follow it then picking and choosing what I follow.
π: 0 β©: 1
Let's read it in context...in order.
25Β But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.
26Β But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:
27Β For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.
28Β If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
29Β Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
30Β A man shall not take his father's wife, nor discover his father's skirt
Clearly, the verses 28 through 30 is not a rape, but fornication or what is commonly known to many people as "consensual".Β
π: 0 β©: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>