HOME | DD
Published: 2007-08-22 14:35:28 +0000 UTC; Views: 7181; Favourites: 242; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
400TX, 35/2Related content
Comments: 62
Moogster [2008-01-31 04:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Congrats on the DD. This photo really caught my eye. It's very lovely.
π: 0 β©: 0
Silenceisdead [2008-01-30 20:29:52 +0000 UTC]
what a sweet moment, the lighting is eally gorgeous and the way the woman and the child pop from the background is really nice
π: 0 β©: 0
Marioona [2008-01-30 15:55:46 +0000 UTC]
He sleeps. Let the silence go on. (inspite of the rough noise of the street)
Amazing, I loved it *, naturalityyy
You shall do more please. Congratulations from the bottom of my heart
Marioona
π: 0 β©: 0
kinipelahh [2008-01-30 13:39:07 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous picture, so natural great shot
congrats on the DD
π: 0 β©: 0
radiohat [2008-01-30 13:22:26 +0000 UTC]
da schaut man hier mal wieder rein und was sieht man? bernhard'sches ungetΓΌm...
π: 0 β©: 0
Killshi7 [2008-01-30 08:19:01 +0000 UTC]
you got a daily dev. good for you. popularity on dev art = that wackle; thing you do that I don't quite understand.
by the way - when I get around my fear of shooting kodak black and white films, what sort of developer would you recommend?
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to Killshi7 [2008-01-30 09:06:51 +0000 UTC]
well well, what i do know is that popularity = chicks! i like. meaning that i do know how things work... maybe a sexy time is just ahead?
i really like tri-x in xtol, i know, everybody does it which is gay as the unique artistic thought is lost BUT it's still a very nice combo which suits mediocre wannabe artists that shoot toy cameras like me very well. on a side note: fear of shooting kodak? afraid of finally getting decent negatives? anyways, after trying ilfosol, lc29, dd-x, d76, rodinal special i find xtol is pretty much a developer.
π: 0 β©: 1
Killshi7 In reply to zort [2008-01-31 02:58:15 +0000 UTC]
ilford gives me lovely negatives. ilford is my friend
I will try xtol, though.
π: 0 β©: 0
ingrid-fabiola [2007-09-25 16:54:34 +0000 UTC]
this is pretty much perfect. the texture of the hair adds so much, and the focus is spot on
π: 0 β©: 0
lkopuz [2007-09-04 09:59:11 +0000 UTC]
bw head..enough sharpen..made by points..very well..
π: 0 β©: 0
ritzamarie [2007-08-25 21:07:34 +0000 UTC]
reminds me of how easy it was for kids, you can just fall asleep anywhere!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
yonderboi [2007-08-24 09:14:12 +0000 UTC]
Ausgewogener Bildaufbau und die Belichtung sitzt echt perfekt.
π: 0 β©: 0
Suzage [2007-08-23 13:23:18 +0000 UTC]
Ach ja, obviously shot with a rf! You should consequently underexpose 1 or 2 stops to avoid highlights, you know. It's serious business.
No honestly, the exposure is freaking perfect And I very much like the shadow on the ground on the left.
π: 0 β©: 1
SpanishJohnny In reply to Suzage [2007-08-23 15:57:59 +0000 UTC]
ja find ich auch... wundert mich immer wieder
π: 0 β©: 1
Suzage In reply to SpanishJohnny [2007-08-23 18:25:17 +0000 UTC]
Waarom praat je Duits tegen me?
π: 0 β©: 1
SpanishJohnny In reply to Suzage [2007-08-24 09:41:35 +0000 UTC]
Waarom praat je nederlands tegen me, ik ik versta je niet... echt niet, ik heb geen idee
π: 0 β©: 1
Suzage In reply to SpanishJohnny [2007-08-24 10:24:17 +0000 UTC]
Ich habe auch keine ahnung
π: 0 β©: 1
SpanishJohnny In reply to Suzage [2007-08-24 11:11:49 +0000 UTC]
itΒ΄s actually for berhard, thatΒ΄s why i wrote german, not to bother you
π: 0 β©: 1
joejoesmoe [2007-08-22 21:27:31 +0000 UTC]
Very nice dude. I wanna see the print of this.
π: 0 β©: 0
colombo [2007-08-22 18:39:21 +0000 UTC]
very nice lady. i want a siesta like that, right there. <3
i want your metering skilzz too, perhaps, ok? ok.
π: 0 β©: 0
Namelast [2007-08-22 17:30:38 +0000 UTC]
Is it a negscan?
Which kind of scanner are you using? WHoa, it is so sad to be asking this, but scanners are the bottleneck for sharing film photos...
The photo is really nice (very) anyway, moment well spotted and the tones are very good!
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to Namelast [2007-08-22 19:26:58 +0000 UTC]
yeah, this is a negative scan. i use the nikon coolscan v ed which is in my opinion a pretty fine scanner.
π: 0 β©: 1
Namelast In reply to zort [2007-08-23 16:26:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the information!
Too bad it will be too expensive for me anyway.
π: 0 β©: 0
cougarr [2007-08-22 17:15:57 +0000 UTC]
what i like in your photos is the perfect contrast that you can achive in the negatives. (i supose this is a negscan...)
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>

























