HOME | DD
AndreOF-Gallery — Adamantina Formation Chart 1.0
#abelisaurid #antarctosaurus #adamantisaurus #adamantina
Published: 2018-07-03 15:49:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 8077; Favourites: 80; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description
Part one from the Adamantina charts, there will be a follow up with the "crocodiles"Notes:
01-I used Pycnonemosaurus for the base of URC R 44, considering the age of Adamantina it may be possible that it would look more like Ekrixinatosaurus/Skorpiovenator like.
Species that were omitted:
01-Maxakalisaurus is excluded because I had no guess to follow the Aeolosaurid or the Saltasaurid classification, it was also a pain to scale up.
02-Adamantina Noasaurid was excluded because it is know from only a vertebrae and I have problems scaling those.
03-Tooth taxa: Dromaeosaurid (Non-Unenlagiinae), Troodontid and Richardoestesia tooth morph have been registered in Adamantina; excluded because "say no to tooth taxa".
References:
Sauropodomorphs of Brazil and Theropods of Brazil Mk.II for the size of the animals; and his Aeolosaurus silhouette.
Austroraptor (Unenlagine), Alamosaurus (Adamantisaurus - modified by ) skeleton
for Pycnonemosaurus skeleton (Abelisaurid)
for Megaraptoran composite (silhouette modified by )
for Bonitasaura (Antarctosaurus)
Related content
Comments: 26
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Your question is not clear to me.
Are you asking if they could be the same animal or commenting on the fact that they are different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Now I understand
Yeah, they are probably distinct. The chronology and stratigraphy of late cretaceous Brazil are yet not well understood, even though that will probably change in the next years since there is a group of researches specializing in dating those. The Parecis group (place Pyconemosaurus is from) would be contemporaneous to Bauru group, if it is chronologically the same age as the place URC R 44 they could be the same animal, but the lack of overlapping remains and accurate dating for their respective localities supports the safer option to treat them as separate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
damn this is cool, have you considered the morisson?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Do you wanna kill me? It is fucking huge, and a mess I'd die before I could finish it.
Maybe during December on my vacation, but for now I don't have time do do such
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
if you decide to go for it, good luck. curious which estimates you're going to use
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Adamantina begins. Oh, pity Maxakalisaurus had to go though. Ehh so many poorly known and unnamed taxa.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Looking good! Btw, I've mentioned this in the message I sent you, but can you link me a tutorial on how to do scaling? I'm going to start learning how to scale in the holidays .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I may help, but it would be a long task.
I'll try to do and send you a "guide-book" for it.
By the way I'm not the best one, but I'll d ma best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jeez. What a massive abelisaurid! By the way, have you ever thought of making a Huincul Formation chart?
Nice chart!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adicionado a lista
👍: 0 ⏩: 1