HOME | DD

#niobrara #bonnerichthys #restoringniobraraformation #xiphactinus
Published: 2018-01-09 17:33:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 1288; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description
1-Nome: Xiphactinus audax
2-Formation: Niobrara Formation, West Interior Sea, 83 Mya.
3-Length: 5 meters.
4-Weight: 1288 Kg (scaling from a Tarpon)
5-Diet: Large predator, filling the same niche as tuna or tarpons fill (but on steroids), could be eaten by sharks and large marine reptiles but would eat everything it could put its teeth on (sometimes it would bit more that it could chew).
6-Classification: No one cares about fish systematics.
1-Nome: Bonnerichthys gladius
2-Formation: Niobrara Formation, West Interior Sea, 83 Mya.
3-Length: 6 meters
4-Weight: 1925 Kg (scaling from Leedsichthys, strange result)
5-Diet: filter feeder, eating whatever is in the plankton: crustaceans, fish larvae, fish eggs.
6-Classification: No one cares about fish systematics.
Reference: ScottHartman www.skeletaldrawing.com/non-di…
DiBgd Bonnerichthys gladius
Related content
Comments: 17
Rahonavis70m [2018-01-10 23:02:10 +0000 UTC]
You don't normally think of large pachycormids in the Cretaceous, but damn.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Rahonavis70m [2018-01-10 23:41:01 +0000 UTC]
Leedsichthys overshadows all the others xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rahonavis70m In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2018-01-11 01:53:16 +0000 UTC]
That’s probably why XD
Also, an ichthyodectid with yellowfin tuna colours! Where have I seen that before? XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Rahonavis70m [2018-01-11 02:02:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeeeeees I saw yours when I was doing Protosphyraena, I initially was going to give it a tarpon coloration but I decided on doing Gillicus with that one and the tuna was the other option.
I didn't meant to copy your style, but I can fix that if you felt "harassed" by it in any way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rahonavis70m In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2018-01-11 13:42:14 +0000 UTC]
Thought so XD no, by all means keep it. It suits ichthyodectids, if anything, I’m flattered
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to acepredator [2018-01-09 20:50:59 +0000 UTC]
Those teeth, while the other one is harmless.
It was originally the bad and the good fish, but that did not sound good so I changed to evil and hero.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Corallianassa In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2018-01-10 17:29:31 +0000 UTC]
If you did three of them, you could have done ´The good, the bad, and the ugly´
With Protosphyraena as the bad, and Xiphactinus as the ugly XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Corallianassa [2018-01-10 17:31:23 +0000 UTC]
Challenge accepted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Corallianassa [2018-01-09 17:47:23 +0000 UTC]
I get 1.923 tonnes for the Bonnerichthys going by Random´s estimate of Leeds.
Anyway, nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Corallianassa [2018-01-09 18:08:37 +0000 UTC]
You are probably correct, the estimate I used was quite old in fact Random's probably better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0