HOME | DD

Arbitran β€” I'M A MOTHERF@*%ING T. REX!!!!!!

#accurate #cassowary #feathered #feathers #jp #jurassic #jw #park #realistic #rex #trex #tyrannosaur #tyrannosaurus #vulture #world #t #tyrannosaurusrex
Published: 2015-07-06 10:09:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 11824; Favourites: 151; Downloads: 32
Redirect to original
Description I got such a good response from my raptor picture, I figured I had to do Rexy

Okay, so in my Alternate Universe Jurassic Park, Rexy is the largest of several Tyrannosaurus specimens engineered on Isla Nublar: her DNA buffers are Gymnogyps, Torgos, Gyps, and even recovered genetic material from Teratornis and Argentavis. All this was based on the hypothesis in the 1990s (when the original Park was under development) that tyrannosaurs were scavengers; therefore the genetic material used in buffering is largely derived from vultures. Coincidentally, though no ratite DNA was used, the feather filaments of Rexy resemble those of a cassowary or rhea quite closely, even on a microscopic level: though on a molecular and genetic level, they are evidently more primitive than those of avialans such as ratites. Those largely covered in filamentous feathers, Rexy does possess vaned feathers on her reduced forelimbs; she appears to use these primitive wings in visual signals to other tyrannosaurs (though these are not fully understood).

Rexy lives in an expansive forested paddock in the northern part of the island, together with several other Tyrannosaurus specimens (with whom she has developed a family-like social bond). It was found shortly after she grew into adolescence that Rexy (and her peers) displayed active predation and intelligent hunting strategies; this was not expected (particularly with the vulture DNA added), thus it is probable that predatory behavior was a very fundamental and highly-developed element of the recovered Tyrannosaurus genome. Apparently a matriarchal leader of the tyrannosaurs, she leads the others in hunts; pack behavior was not anticipated during initial cloning and experimentation (potential difficulties of containment in light of this behavior has not yet been addressed by InGen staff).

Relatively intelligent (preliminary tests appear to indicate her overall intelligence resembles an owl or vulture), Rexy has displayed sophisticated hunting techniques, such as rudimentary signals to pack members using her wings: using these signals, she can coordinate effective (though not terribly complex) attacks on prey targets. Also displaying maternal behavior towards the youngest tyrannosaur specimens, she often defends them from adolescents (who show cannibalistic tendencies): she is known to have terminated and consumed two specimens in such circumstances. With regard to her senses: her eyesight is very keen, binocular , and her sense of smell is literally the most advanced of any animal ever studied.

When not hunting, Rexy has proved to be relatively docile and spends large amounts of time sleeping. Her calls are reminiscent of a growling crocodile or hissing cassowary ; though she only vocalizes when threatened.
Related content
Comments: 91

dragoboi123 [2021-12-15 09:32:09 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BonnieZillaRex [2020-12-16 05:30:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

shadowdollcat [2019-06-09 16:24:18 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting, love the idea, even though the original did not have feathers, I believe they could make this work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dromeothetroognathus [2018-04-26 18:53:14 +0000 UTC]

-_-?(that head)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JPGuchiha [2017-12-03 16:44:24 +0000 UTC]

Is there any real evidence that says T-rex had feathers?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mark0731 In reply to JPGuchiha [2017-12-05 13:52:08 +0000 UTC]

This was made in 2015, that's why it has more feathers than what is possible since Bell et al. (2017).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JPGuchiha In reply to mark0731 [2017-12-06 03:52:41 +0000 UTC]

Okay than.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

william023 [2017-04-08 14:38:58 +0000 UTC]

I want to see that mural on it's own.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Annabeth5110 [2017-03-12 23:44:27 +0000 UTC]

Hello, Nostalgia Critic fan!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PeteriDish [2017-03-06 20:09:29 +0000 UTC]

damn son! this really looks like a mix between a vulture and a cassowary! XD and t.rex. a faint hint of the poor guy Love it to bits though!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

D-Juan [2017-03-05 14:20:59 +0000 UTC]

I love the description almost as much as the looks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

william023 [2017-01-20 12:42:27 +0000 UTC]

valley of gwangi had gwangi make beleivable noises, like gurgling, belching, and screeching. Maybe this version of rexy is making a high-pitched noise? Beautiful as ever!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beanarts [2016-12-09 07:21:43 +0000 UTC]

Facts are going to kill fiction. Had the facts been known about dinosaurs in the early days, I don't think there would ever have been a Jurassic Park. How many people go to visit Emus and Ostriches (probably more closely related to dinosaurs) shows, and how many visit crocodile shows? I don't know, but I don't see people being as interested in birds as they are other creatures. Dinosaurs in the classic sense were fascinating,Β they made us curious, filled us with imagination of the what ifs, "I wonder what X dinosaur looked like" when you have no facts, you can go to town with imagination, but once we know exactly what they looked like, there's less of a mystery behind them. It just comes down to "yep, they had feathers, they were this colour..." draw them any other way and you're simply going to be criticised for drawing them "wrong"

How many kids play with Trex toys, and how many kids play with toys of vultures/emus/ostriches. Just not as fun it seems. Thus, facts are killing the fantasy and killing the mystery.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 4

Lediblock2 In reply to beanarts [2018-02-16 20:47:56 +0000 UTC]

The thing is, we actually don't know that much about dinosaurs. Most of that definite information only works for individual species, not whole generalizations. Hell, recently the whole T-rex having feathers thing was found to be bullshit - phylogenetic bracketing just doesn't seem to work anymore with dinosaurs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DEDEYE64 In reply to Lediblock2 [2018-02-16 21:00:55 +0000 UTC]

Keep waiting on more conclusive results. Math can only go so far either and we still only have tiny fragments from the feet and ventral areas, places known to be featherless anyway even in some large birds. That coelurosaur heritage still is a decent chance of vestigial filaments.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to DEDEYE64 [2018-02-16 21:31:00 +0000 UTC]

....No, we don't. We have portions from the face, the chest, the sides - plenty of places.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DEDEYE64 In reply to Lediblock2 [2018-02-16 21:33:14 +0000 UTC]

The only reliable pattern we have is that the legs, ventral surfaces, face, and sides seem featherless.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to DEDEYE64 [2018-02-16 21:39:55 +0000 UTC]

Oh, so you admit that it's more than the underside and the feet.

Also, Daspletosaurus' facial scales beg to differ on the 'no facial impressions'.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

DEDEYE64 In reply to Lediblock2 [2018-02-17 03:49:07 +0000 UTC]

Still agree on a bald face, but you misinterpreted something. Carr had osteological corrections for a rugose keratinized or scaly face not actual skin impressions. Just looked at the paper again.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DEDEYE64 In reply to Lediblock2 [2018-02-16 21:42:25 +0000 UTC]

Just got corrected on that, thank you very much. Still no dorsal impression to prove for certain total baldness.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator In reply to beanarts [2017-03-18 00:47:30 +0000 UTC]

Are you nuts?

- EVERY BIRD is LITERALLY a dinosaur.

- people like watching bird of prey shows. So why wouldn't they enjoy shows that involve what are basically colossal birds of prey with teeth?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to acepredator [2017-03-18 00:49:44 +0000 UTC]

Also: you SHOULD get criticized for drawing something wrong.

Imagine if you drew a tiger with horizontal stripes. You deserve criticism. The same applies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sawcyy In reply to acepredator [2017-05-21 05:16:20 +0000 UTC]

Flawed comparison - tigers aren't extinct.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FeatherNerd In reply to sawcyy [2017-05-29 13:19:04 +0000 UTC]

Neither are dinosaurs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dragoboi123 In reply to FeatherNerd [2021-12-15 09:28:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

william023 In reply to beanarts [2017-01-20 12:37:50 +0000 UTC]

crocodiles look fun for two seconds, then it occurs to you that all they do is bask. and bask. and bask. my local zoo, flamignoland, has a reptile house. the water monitor is a hoot, but the other reptiles like the snakes and alligators just slept all day, kids ran in, and then quickly ran back out. Yet TONS of people crowded to see the crested seriema 'killing' rubber snakes, to watch trained horn-bills, parrots, owls and vultures carry out tasks. Many people followed the emus, rheas, and ostriches around. The parrots where riding bicycles, doing jigsaws and unfurling flags. Birds are beloved. Reptiles look cool and are photogenic, but birds are active, they do interesting things, and have charm.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to william023 [2017-03-18 00:48:30 +0000 UTC]

To be fair, non-bird reptiles are on average just as smart and do similar interesting things. It's just that most of them spend a lot of time being lazy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kagansaurus In reply to acepredator [2017-03-18 15:14:21 +0000 UTC]

It's not really that they're lazy, but they have to conserve energy due to their ectothermic nature.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to Kagansaurus [2017-03-18 15:42:47 +0000 UTC]

Monitor lizards disagree-unless they are overfed, they are rather entertaining

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to beanarts [2016-12-11 13:13:25 +0000 UTC]

People love going to bird of prey shows though.Β 
Everyone loves eagles, vultures, falcons and owls. The way they look simply demands respect, nobody finds a golden eagle silly. Cassowaries are terrifying too, so are marabou storks or shoebills and everyone agrees that geese are animals you just don't want to mess with, not to mention swans.

When I found out we had the colours of Microraptor I was so amazed. Same for everyone I told it about. People want to know what dinosaurs looked like, but when they find out about it it's suddenly not amazing anymore according to you? Pretty sure people who think that way are just interested in movie monsters and not in the natural world.Β 
You also need to draw a tiger correct if you don't want to get criticised. Nobody makes a problem about that.Β 

We just need a good movie or documentary with feathered dinosaurs. That's all you need to get people to like feathered dinosaurs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MonarchyArt [2016-11-17 14:55:24 +0000 UTC]

Who said feathered T-rexes aren't creepy?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Asuma17 [2016-09-10 05:30:10 +0000 UTC]

Not gonna lie the feathers are okay, but I don't our T.Rex would be that covered in feathers.

And also would you like to hear what she sounds like accurately?

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-07-02 22:21:48 +0000 UTC]

It's ugly but the good gnarly kind! XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Arbitran In reply to Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-07-18 05:29:20 +0000 UTC]

That she is!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alvaro84 [2016-05-28 06:59:54 +0000 UTC]

This is a goddamn scary creature

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDubstepAddict [2016-02-13 17:17:25 +0000 UTC]

Yeah! That's one epic JP Rexy!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zimzilla99 [2016-01-20 00:19:25 +0000 UTC]

If I saw this I'm not sure if id be hungry or revolted

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Arbitran In reply to Zimzilla99 [2016-01-20 09:36:47 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure she'd have the same thoughts about you haha

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Arbitran [2016-01-20 12:13:12 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, well she'd have to see and find me first

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Arbitran In reply to Zimzilla99 [2016-01-20 22:37:35 +0000 UTC]

Shouldn't be hard, she can smell prey from miles away.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Arbitran [2016-01-20 23:29:44 +0000 UTC]

Then I'll die trying to bludgeon my KFC

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WOLFBLADE111 [2015-12-24 17:02:36 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2015-12-12 01:33:21 +0000 UTC]

No feathers on her head?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Arbitran In reply to acepredator [2015-12-12 03:24:34 +0000 UTC]

Not this time Went for more of a vulture/ratite look for this one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Megasupream In reply to Arbitran [2016-07-02 09:09:47 +0000 UTC]

Could you make another version? Maybe base it off of Saurian?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

FeatherNerd In reply to Megasupream [2017-12-07 20:43:16 +0000 UTC]

Could you make another version?
Maybe base it off of Saurian?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Megasupream In reply to FeatherNerd [2017-12-07 21:28:43 +0000 UTC]

Hey ur being gay pls stop it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FeatherNerd In reply to Megasupream [2017-12-08 05:11:59 +0000 UTC]

No u

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Arbitran In reply to Megasupream [2016-07-18 05:29:57 +0000 UTC]

I've considered it. I haven't really had time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XStreamChaosOfficial [2015-11-24 18:11:03 +0000 UTC]

This is exactly how a picture a t-rex! awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>