HOME | DD
ArtBIT — Stereoscopic Test
Published: 2006-08-10 03:50:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 8225; Favourites: 77; Downloads: 1103
Redirect to original
Description
!!! CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL VIEW !!!! dAv5 has some issue with flash fullView, this is a temporary solution !
~3Dimka Gave me a few tips for home made stereoscopic image pairs, but before I do anything big, I needed to experiment a bit with the new knowledge...
(o' goody!
)So this is basically a rotating cube, rendered as a stereoscopic image pair, and if correctly viewed, it'll give you the full 3D depth, experience.
The default parameters are set to best suit my vision, but I've also left these two sliders for you to tweak, and play with, to best meet with your eyes needs.
I think that the cross-eyed method gives the best results here.
For those of you who are not familiar with the stereoscopic viewing = Google for a tut.
Those of you who are lazy, here are the first two I Googled ->Cross-eye method , Parallel method .
When you've practiced enough on stereoscopic pairs, search the net for stereograms, and discover the real magic.
You could also visit gallery for some excellent animated stereograms.
__________________________
Disclaimer
This work is not in the public domain. This work is copyright © ~ArtBIT 2005-2006. All rights reserved.
You may not use and/or reproduce my artwork in any way without my explicit and written permission.
Related content
Comments: 82
lol... for you see, there is no cube...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Holy crap, that's a little scary! It's so odd to see something so clearly when you're eyes are crossed, it feels so unnatural I had to snap myself out of it, for fear of my eyes sticking like that xD
Nice work there
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol have you ever tried viewing stereograms? The experience is somewhat even cooler!
I'm glad you liked it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Stereograms eh? Where would a lad find one of those thingys?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For example www.eyetricks.com
The trick with the sterograms is to merge the two adjacent tiles into one, as with the two cubes here. Every image has a background plane, as a wall with a wallpaper tile, and several layers of depth, also textured with the same tile pattern. So, imagine, a wall, and a paper circle that is 10cm in front of it, than another smaller circle in front of that one, and a smaller in front of that one and so on, and everything is textured with the same tiled pattern. Now, if the distance between the layers of circles is fine enough, you'll get an illusion of a ball. That's the basic principle of displaying a 3D object inside of a steregram, but the complexity of an object isn't limited to a simple shape, the scene can be as complex as the moment when a bowling ball hits the bowling pins and they are just about to fly everywhere...
My advice is to try and focus the background wall first, cuz of the different layers tend to make the focusing difficult. So look at the upper or lower quarter of the image and focus a background plane first, and the object will naturally emerge out of it...
I think that in viewing stereograms the parallel method is more in use than the crossed-eye method. If you try to view the stereogram with the crossEyed method and it was designed for parralelMethod, you'll get the inverted image, and vice-versa.
Geesh. Don't worry, this sounds complex to me even lol, if you need more help, look for the tutorials on viewing stereograms ok?
Take care.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha, well thanks for the reply
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Really strange and freaky, AB.... but I like it. I'm little ditzy, so I'm not quite sure what to do, EVEN after reading the directions!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just take it easy, do not overstrain your pretty o' eyes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Damn man, thats sweet. But I think that its easier if the cubes are overlapping, no? You should try to make an engine outta this. It is seriously cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
For the parallel method - yes, but for the crossed-eye method, the distance between the cubes can go up to screen length
Thanks, and nice idea, I'll think about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That is soooooooooo cool. Please please please try it with other things. That would be even cooler.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Holy crap that is cool!
Is it supposed to look like the cubes are sort of flipping inside out and stuff? That's what I saw
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Damn dAv5 flash issue... 13 people viewed this lousy preview and only two people have actually downloaded the movie, including you...
*sigh*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Anyone who had a play on words of full view now has to make a new play on words for download...
Anyway, funky cube, I knew crossing my eyes was a good talent to learn
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lol, 'tis a skill, that is more and more needed in this modern society
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Maybe they can't find the download thing. This new layout is a little confusing. You could put a link in the description that says "full view" and it could be a link to the download thing...
*off to read the tutorials*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Yeah and the new links are not underlined, so people won't notice them either :/
Patience is a virtue, no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Patience is a wonderful virtue
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh my eyes...
I tried the parallel method but I still see the boxes flipping inside out. Will have to try again later
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't screw with your eyes, you need goooooood vision for what you do.
This thing is not worth it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol but I wanna see the cool 3D thing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol yes it is
Well I think it probably is...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lol ... well, no. You're supposed to see one cube, but totally 3D, as in hollographic projection.
Close your left eye, and look at your mouse. That's a 2D image you see.
Now close your right eye, and look at your mouse again. That also is a 2D image, but viewed from a slightly different angle. Now alternate your viewing eye, and you'll notice the slight change in angle.
Open both of your eyes, and you'll get a three dimensional feel of the object you are viewing, in this case, your mouse. Two images merge in your brain, and you get an illusion of space.
The same should happen here, but you need to mix the images together. There are several methods of viewing a stereoscopic image pair, and the two most popular are paralel and crossed-eye method. There are links, in the description, that will lead you to the tutorials for both methods. Try reading them, and then try again to view the cube...
It is a pretty cool effect, but I think that stereograms are much cooler. Stereograms look like seemless tiled patterns at first, but when you view them correctly, a 3D object emerges out of it! It is very trippy, and I thought that I was daydreaming when I've managed to view my first stereogram! It was like the space bent, and that monitor gained depth...
Try looking the net for stereoscopic image pairs for you to practice, and then look for some stereograms...
But read teh tutorials first
Take care hon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0