HOME | DD

Atticus-W — WOLF Standard A No. 69

Published: 2010-02-25 22:12:39 +0000 UTC; Views: 1254; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 12
Redirect to original
Description Now, the WOLF is a railroad infamous for its paint scheme variations, and certainly we here at the GSBW are hardly ones to dabble in business THAT personal. (We be loco-builders, not artists! XD) But, turns out we had a copy of an old WOLF painting brochure kicking around (called “How to Paint a Wolf,” as I recall), so we did this SA (henceforward the new abbreviation for Standard A, which is a darn awkward class name XD) up according to that. (Stock factory engines get a stock factory paint scheme. ) In my humble oppinion, it don't look half bad. ^^

The tender and cab of this engine took a bit of modding for conversion to firewood handling (pretty hard to “shovel” logs through a vestibule coal chute XD), and basically the back wall of the cab had to be cut out for access to the tender. I was tempted to remove the cab’s side doors, too, for that more “traditional” look, but then figured, hey, on the WOLF, those things might actually come in handy if this fellow ever winds up in Alaskaland.

Hope ya like.



WOLF RR & Nav. Co. ©



(Note: For all of these SAs that I’ve been posting, I’ve been putting them into my main gallery before putting them into scraps, as is NOT my style for posting repaints. Since this is rather likely the last SA I’ll be posting, I will be from this point on once again posting repaints directly to my scraps (and if it’s your engine I’m posting, I’ll leave you a note to make sure you see it). As good as some repaints look, I do hate to annoy people with pictures in their inboxes that they’ve pretty much already seen (though since each SA I’ve posted HAS been custom modified for its new owner, they’ve KINDA been like new pictures... but then, they’ve been the ones getting gallery status anyway. Hey. XD)
Related content
Comments: 46

gunslinger87 [2010-03-01 22:09:51 +0000 UTC]

Oooh! that is a sharp looking steamer!

I wonder how one of these would look in ER&W colors?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to gunslinger87 [2010-03-01 23:03:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! (Or thanks to Sam. XD)

And that, sir, I do not know! XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chakat-Railrunner [2010-02-28 22:12:11 +0000 UTC]

Nice work, as always good sir!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to Chakat-Railrunner [2010-03-01 01:35:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JoeltheSwedishDragon [2010-02-27 00:37:08 +0000 UTC]

Wow, very neat, my man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to JoeltheSwedishDragon [2010-03-01 01:35:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks kindly Joel. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeltheSwedishDragon In reply to Atticus-W [2010-03-01 15:48:00 +0000 UTC]

Very welcome, man,

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Railwolf [2010-02-26 00:25:53 +0000 UTC]

Epic win! and yes, the "how to paint a Wolf" still kicks around our own shops as a basic pattern ^^ Kinda a "when in Doubt, grab the instructions" kinda thing XD


wow, the balloon stack, headlamp, and modification really give her a "tasteful backdate" look.

She actually reminds me of the locomotive in "Break-heart Pass" XDXDXD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to Railwolf [2010-02-26 01:26:49 +0000 UTC]

Ahahahaha, I bet. XD

And thanks. The stack is rather intentionally squat so the thing doesn't get knocked off everytime the engine goes under an overpass (the trickyness of a balloon stack is a direct relationship with the size of the engine XD), but I basicaly tackled it the way logging roads did. And eh, looking like the Breakheart Pass engine in't ALL bad, given the premise. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Plokman6 [2010-02-25 23:23:53 +0000 UTC]

I like it very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to Plokman6 [2010-02-26 01:30:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks much. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Plokman6 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-26 03:00:20 +0000 UTC]

No problem my friend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheBetterBeatle54 [2010-02-25 23:22:03 +0000 UTC]

Coolio de Fabio

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to TheBetterBeatle54 [2010-02-26 01:30:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Arge.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheBetterBeatle54 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-26 01:42:59 +0000 UTC]

No problem Atty

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kota123 [2010-02-25 22:39:35 +0000 UTC]

Looks good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to Kota123 [2010-02-25 22:55:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CNW8646 [2010-02-25 22:39:03 +0000 UTC]

Could you do one for Sierra Pacific? I would like to see what you come up with. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-02-25 22:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Give me stats. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-25 23:22:19 +0000 UTC]

Well, Sierra Pacific is based on D&RGW & Southern Pacific. So I'm guessing that if we had a steamer it would be a cross between the 2, or based on one of the designs. So I guess just rig it up to look like a D&RGW steam locomotive (I've always liked the pilot plow for D&RGW [link] ).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-02-26 01:21:26 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough. (Just bear in mind, the SA is a standard gauge engine.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-26 01:25:30 +0000 UTC]

I know. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-25 22:59:25 +0000 UTC]

Like what?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-02-25 23:15:22 +0000 UTC]

Paint scheme, numbers, lettering style, that kinda thing... XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-10 02:08:52 +0000 UTC]

You might want to do a W&A version of the Standard A. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-23 23:23:47 +0000 UTC]

:iconyouareincorrectplz:

Why would I want to do that? XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-23 23:48:03 +0000 UTC]

Well, the Wolf changed it's name half way through it's life. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-24 00:11:38 +0000 UTC]

"Not my department," says Wernher von Brahn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 00:22:38 +0000 UTC]

Ok. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-25 23:22:12 +0000 UTC]

Oh, ok. That's easy [link] You can pick from one of these, or just go with black & grafite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-23 23:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Eheheheh, you know, I'm not entirely sure I ever wrote this request down! Forgive me. I must go check.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 00:01:45 +0000 UTC]

No Problem man. ^^

Well, Sierra Pacific would have been the modern version. The predecessor road is Denver Sierra Pacific & Western. So it's your choice, it can be DSP&W, or Sierra Pacific (reportig mark SIEP).

Or you could do like the C&TS, have the new reporting mark (SIEP), & class of locomotive on the cab under the number. While the old lettering (Denver Seirra Pacific & Western) on the tender with the railroads logo. [link] I have a logo to put on the tender like this K-36. I'll email it to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-24 00:15:08 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm... well, records tell me that this locomotive went into production in 1952... I assume it would indeed have been the DSP&W that purchased the loco back then? I can letter it however you want. "C&TS-style" sounds neat, but it's totally your call. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 00:27:12 +0000 UTC]

C&TS style please. ^^ The locomotive would most likely still be around today in excursion service on the SIEP.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-24 00:28:25 +0000 UTC]

Vur gut. I shall enter this order in my records as such.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 00:41:28 +0000 UTC]

BTW, because it's in modern excursion service, that means it will need roller bearings. Instead of changing trucks, just put RB on the journal box covers. They can be converted, but still keep the covers for historical reasons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-24 00:51:46 +0000 UTC]

Can do, Cap. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 01:04:52 +0000 UTC]

^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 00:36:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Atty. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-08-24 00:51:33 +0000 UTC]

Funny story... you WERE already in my records! XD I've just been ignoring them all summer.

Oh well. At least the system knows you exist... it's just a matter of time, now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-08-24 01:03:59 +0000 UTC]

Ok. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to CNW8646 [2010-09-09 00:35:38 +0000 UTC]

It's in scraps, so here's a link: [link] .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CNW8646 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-09-09 01:03:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Atty. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sampug394 [2010-02-25 22:36:19 +0000 UTC]

OH NOES

NOT ANOTHER GOOD LOOKING ONE

AGH XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atticus-W In reply to Sampug394 [2010-02-25 22:55:47 +0000 UTC]

I know, grargh. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sampug394 In reply to Atticus-W [2010-02-25 23:25:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0