HOME | DD

b13visualsKnD-03

Published: 2012-04-04 20:09:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 61419; Favourites: 690; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I usually don't do pregnant-shoots, but since these are good friends and I got to do something special, I did it!

Models: Dirk and Kim

Wow! My first DD!!! Thanks everyone for all the comments and favs! Highly appreciated! Usually I thank each individual for their but because there where so mine, I just couldn't. So here's a big thnx to all!!!
Related content
Comments: 542

DimensionSeven In reply to ??? [2012-04-30 07:26:29 +0000 UTC]

trying...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CytoSkelly In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-22 23:20:44 +0000 UTC]

"trying" because you're not getting it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DimensionSeven In reply to ??? [2012-04-29 14:13:59 +0000 UTC]

I know that, but that doesn't make a difference, the visual end result is the same for the casual viewer. The 'message' is there and it's highly destructive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chesiregrin In reply to ??? [2012-04-29 11:56:29 +0000 UTC]

She's not actually smoking and the I highly doubt the shot is promoting smoking while pregnant. And look it the smoke again. It's fake.
The shot is all about interpritation. I kinda interpreted it like showing ignorance of the generation. Thanks for your thought provoking comment, though ^-^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to chesiregrin [2012-04-29 14:14:33 +0000 UTC]

I know that it's digital, but that doesn't make a difference, the visual end result is the same for the casual viewer. The 'message' is there and it's highly destructive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

CytoSkelly In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 06:33:50 +0000 UTC]

you think the message is "if you're pregnant, you should smoke"? if i showed you a violent picture, would the picture be promoting violence? it can be the opposite, drawing attention to a negative thing, not to promote, but to provoke thought

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to CytoSkelly [2012-04-30 07:30:00 +0000 UTC]

it is not the picture that promotes anything, it is dA that promotes the picture...
(I do know that it's not 100% correct to say so as the choices of gallery directors not reflect the will of the owners of dA, but it's close).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lequiem In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-03 03:28:46 +0000 UTC]

First of all, it's volunteer gallery directors that promote the pictures, not DA. If you have an issue, I suggest you take it up with them. Secondly, your replies in this thread are highly disturbing. Exactly how sheltered do you think people should be? How about we remove pictures with guns, fast food, prostitution, etc and hide them all away from public view? With the right education, anyone can tell you that certain things are harmful. If someone thinks that smoking while pregnant is okay while looking at the picture... well, the picture isn't the problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to lequiem [2012-05-03 14:57:04 +0000 UTC]

Your questions have already been answered. Thank you for your opinion though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chesiregrin In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 15:18:24 +0000 UTC]

Well, that's your own personal message. If that's all the piece says to you, just don't look at it anymore. Simple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to chesiregrin [2012-04-29 20:05:53 +0000 UTC]

I'd like to take your advice but sadly I see the result at my work regulary as I'm a pediatrician.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chesiregrin In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 01:40:50 +0000 UTC]

Well then if you're frustrated about smoking while pregnant, go do something about it. I'm not sure how posting a protestful comment on dA is going to make you feel any better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

little-wild-one In reply to ??? [2012-04-29 11:41:21 +0000 UTC]

You do know that you can pose with a cigarette and not be smoking it, right? The smoke is fake.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to little-wild-one [2012-04-29 14:17:23 +0000 UTC]

That's called passive smoking and it can be alsmost as dangerous as active smoking.
But even if the photograph had been done with an electric cigarette or with photoshop, the message of the picture is the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

medli20 In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 18:05:37 +0000 UTC]

With that logic, one could say that this photo encourages people to discard their old umbrellas in fields, promoting littering. Shame on you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to medli20 [2012-04-29 20:19:36 +0000 UTC]

they are still in use.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ToxicAlice92 In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 17:41:24 +0000 UTC]

Really? Because art is different to each person, and since the artists has not specified what the message exactly is, only that it's for a couple of friends, I beg to differ. The artists blatantly says in a comment that it's hard to get a pregnant women in that country anywhere close to a cigarette, for one, and for another, he also says that the smoke is photoshopped, so it wasn't actually lit. Since it's open to interpretation, and not depicting real Life, the message is NOT the same. Other people may see it differently. "Such ignorance," indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to ToxicAlice92 [2012-04-29 20:18:58 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I see it differently. The photo depicts a smoking pregnant woman and it's widely promoted on dA, without even having a mature tag on. How hip is that! And you don't see the violance in this scene depicted? With all my respect, in my eyes you are the ignorant here, you and all those people who think it's all okay.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

divine--apathia In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-03 03:36:50 +0000 UTC]

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to divine--apathia [2012-05-03 14:59:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

divine--apathia In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-03 03:36:37 +0000 UTC]

:thumb216740206: I have photos depicting murdered people. Does that mean I support murdering?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to divine--apathia [2012-05-03 15:02:04 +0000 UTC]

I do not dare speculating what that suggests...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divine--apathia In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-22 23:41:49 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't mean anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ToxicAlice92 In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 23:25:03 +0000 UTC]

Oh, nut you're only assuming that we're saying it's okay. And no, I personally don't see any violence depicted here. That's not ignorance, that's a different interpretation, which art is supposed to evoke. Just as this couple has a different interpretation of what a good pregnancy shoot theme is, I have a different interpretation of what you see here. I here a message about the consequences and bad treatment of others being portrayed to bring it to our attention so we can do it differently. You see it as glamourization. If you believe that having an opinion is ignorance, than you should really look up the definition and learn the difference. And again, there's no mature content tag because by deviantART's standards, this photo does not meet the requirement for it. So it has nothing to do with being "hip," he just has no reason to do so, and it doesn't go against the rules of dA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to ToxicAlice92 [2012-04-30 07:33:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry for you that you fail to see the violent content here but I guess I can't do anything about that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ToxicAlice92 In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 13:15:32 +0000 UTC]

It's not that I "fail" to see it, as you so ignorantly say. To interpret a work of art differently isn't "failure." It's the point. But I apologize that you fail to understand the concept of perceptual interpretation and that the whole idea is utterly and sorrowfully lost upon you. I guess we can't all understand the many different depths and definitions of art, hm?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to ToxicAlice92 [2012-04-30 14:44:09 +0000 UTC]

All in the ame of art, hmm? An argument you cannot beat. You're not fair.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ToxicAlice92 In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 15:28:47 +0000 UTC]

Considering this is a piece of art open to interpretation, it's very fair. Your jdugement of my difference of interpretation as "failing to see something" is not only unfair, it's also narrow minded.

If you see something there, then that's fine and I respect that. I do not, however, respect being told that I've "failed" to see something as one way in accordance to a singular person and only that way when it's open to be seen differently.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

iFMAtey In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 15:16:28 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry to cut in here, but I have researched and lived through "passive smoking" and I think you got the wrong idea sir.
Passive smoking, or second-hand smoke (SHS), is "the involuntary inhaling of smoke from other people's cigarettes, cigars, or pipes."

In this photograph the woman is merely posing with an unlit cigarette. There is no smoking, nor is there smoke inhalation going on. Just touching a cigarette is not passive smoking. This photo was just simply doctored to get the effect and message they were intending for.

No, I highly doubt the photo is promoting pregnant women to smoke. Most likely the message is showing the "ignorance of the generation."

As for the Photoshop thing, when this photo was doctored with Photoshop the original picture showed an unlit cigarette. After they doctored it, the cigarette seemed to be lit but is not actually lit.

To sum this up, the women is just posing with the cigarette, the cigarette is not lit, and the smoke is fake (just drew in there after the photo was taken).

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

DimensionSeven In reply to iFMAtey [2012-04-29 20:08:49 +0000 UTC]

well, you can't deny that the end result shows a smoking pregnant woman, can you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

little-wild-one In reply to iFMAtey [2012-04-29 15:40:44 +0000 UTC]

Don't bother, he already knows. It still offends his precious little ass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iFMAtey In reply to little-wild-one [2012-04-29 15:46:01 +0000 UTC]

Oh well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

little-wild-one In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 14:22:15 +0000 UTC]

The smoke is photoshopped.
And an image of someone smoking whilst pregnant is not a promotion of it. It's just the same as a staged photo of anything negative, like violence or crime. It's not real. Stop making such a dramatic fuss.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to little-wild-one [2012-04-29 14:27:07 +0000 UTC]

Such ignorance...

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

bohobella In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 03:40:42 +0000 UTC]

Did this photo make you go out and smoke while pregnant? No? Really?

Guess you were wrong, then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to bohobella [2012-04-30 07:24:25 +0000 UTC]

lol, how funny of you to ask this from a man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bohobella In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-30 20:17:41 +0000 UTC]

How funny of a man to be judging pregnant women in the first place!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to bohobella [2012-04-30 22:14:46 +0000 UTC]

how funny if that man is a pediatrician who works with the 'results'...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bohobella In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-01 02:42:40 +0000 UTC]

The results of photoshopped cigarettes, really?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to bohobella [2012-05-01 12:52:36 +0000 UTC]

lol, you're really hopeless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bohobella In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-02 07:00:34 +0000 UTC]

Nope, just a wee bit intelligent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to bohobella [2012-05-02 07:57:43 +0000 UTC]

suuuure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bohobella In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-05-02 16:01:04 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Falketra In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 16:29:09 +0000 UTC]

Since you seem to know so much about this picture, i'd like to ask what you think it's trying to say.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DimensionSeven In reply to Falketra [2012-04-29 20:03:19 +0000 UTC]

I'm not the one to ask this question.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Falketra In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 20:36:56 +0000 UTC]

Well you certainly seem to have a very strong opinion on how terrible it is, so yes I do think you're the one i'd like to ask.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

little-wild-one In reply to DimensionSeven [2012-04-29 14:30:57 +0000 UTC]

! Can't argue with that, huh? Point proven.
Jeez, some people want to wrap the whole damn world in cotton wool, don't they? Go back to your knitting, grandma.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

XxSofyaXxXAnoukxX In reply to ??? [2012-04-29 11:19:51 +0000 UTC]

Why does she fucking smoke? She's prgenant and has to care about the baby!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 6

b13visuals In reply to XxSofyaXxXAnoukxX [2012-05-01 14:10:19 +0000 UTC]

Does she smoke?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dewprisms In reply to XxSofyaXxXAnoukxX [2012-04-30 01:27:15 +0000 UTC]

Why do people make ignorant comments about things that have nothing to do with the art and everything to do with things that are none of their business? The world may never know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>