HOME | DD

Published: 2017-04-08 08:18:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 6099; Favourites: 62; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Rosenthal's next block of upgrades were planned before Block 1 was completed.Block II was significantly more extensive than Block I. Rosenthal used a combination of 3D scanning and 3D printing techniques, leveraging its experience as a subcontractor manufacturing parts for larger firms, to fabricate completely new wing boxes and wing-sweep mechanisms. The improved design, taking advantage of the more than 50 years of advancements in materials and manufacturing, greatly reduced the number of parts required for the sweep assembly, reducing weight and the amount of maintenance required. The traditional framed windscreen was replaced by a single-piece design from the ST-21. Finally, a large amount of the aircraft's skin was replaced by composites. The weight reductions necessitated recertification with Osean NAVAIR to ensure that there would be no issues with harmonic vibrations when launching from or landing on a carrier deck, an issue that had plagued the F-35 and F/A-18 during their development processes.
Block II also replaced the Tomcat's F110-GE-400 engines with F110-GE-432 engines, derived from the F110-GE-132 engines of Block 60 F-16s, for a maximum of 32,600 pounds of thrust per engine, bringing the Block II Quickstrike to the "promised land" of a 1.0 thrust to weight ratio at loaded weight.
On the avionics front, the APG-71 was replaced by an AESA radar derived from the APG-82 of the F-15E, much as the APG-71 was derived from the APG-70.
Finally, the canopy received a coating derived from that of HAVE GLASS V F-16s and the prominent fan blades of the engines received a RAM coating, giving the canopy a distinctive gold tint and slightly reducing the jet's radar cross-section.
With AESA, lighter weight, higher thrust to weight ratio, and improved reliability combined with the qualities that had already made the Tomcat one of the most popular Generation 4 fighters on the market, the Block II Quickstrikes were truly a force to be reckoned with, able to hold their own with nearly any Gen 4 or 4.5 aircraft they came up against, and being able to punch above their weight to a point against Gen 5s. In addition to Rosenthal's own air arm, the Block II upgrade package was marketed to smaller air forces who wished to revitalize their Tomcat fleets or wanted Gen 4.5 capability without the flaws of some of the existing platforms, such as the short range of the Super Hornet.
F-14D Bu. No. 167549, also known as "Leviathan," was the lead aircraft for the majority of the Block II upgrades, and received the last elements of the package by the beginning of 2021, with the rest of the Rosenthal fleet following along at a rapid pace.
In addition to internal changes, Rosenthal Tomcats also received a rather obvious external change: a 4-tone "splinter" camouflage scheme. After-Action Reports from Rosenthal's participation in RIMPAC 2018 made it obvious that the existing Tactical Paint Scheme was proving to be a hindrance due to the nature of Rosenthal doctrine, which revolved around flying low and at night. While this meant that their aircraft were extremely difficult to detect by electronic means, Rosenthal found themselves being engaged visually with almost maddening frequency, as the light gray of the TPS scheme was silhouetting the Rosenthal jets against the dark water or ground. As such, it was decided to paint the Tomcats in a dark paint scheme. The splinter pattern, while serving little tactical purpose, was chosen for two reasons: It provided a slight disruption of the aircraft when viewed from above, and evoked memories of the splinter camouflaged Tomcats at Osea's Naval Strike And Air Warfare Center, fitting considering Rosenthal's role providing aggressor support to the Osean armed forces. By the end of 2018 all Rosenthal Tomcats were painted in the new scheme, which they would wear for the rest of their careers.
Leviathan is shown here as she appeared around the year 2021, shortly after receiving her Block II upgrade. She is loaded for a standoff Suppression of Enemy Air Defense mission with a quartet of AGM-84J SLAM-ERs (AGM-84Ks with the unitary warheads replaced with Combined Effects Munitions bomblets), 4 AIM-154D Anacondas on dual rail launchers, and 2 AIM-9X Sidewinders. Anacondas are loaded instead of the ubiquitous AGM-88E AARGM because with its tri-mode AESA seeker, the AIM-154D is capable of functioning as an anti-radar missile on par with the AGM-88 while still retaining its air-to-air ability. Additionally, the smaller form factor of the AIM-154 enables more missiles to be carried, consequently increasing the number of targets that can be engaged by a single aircraft.
The owners of the property depicted herein and I maintain our respective rights.
This artwork may not be used without my express written permission.
Related content
Comments: 18
EntityPixel [2022-07-08 13:23:34 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stargazzer811 [2021-04-29 02:24:35 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Kiba928 [2017-04-25 06:13:46 +0000 UTC]
This is practically verbatim the specs for my F-14E Tomcat II, aside from TVC. Have you been reading my mind?!
Btw, love the inclusion of the dual rail launchers. I'm currently planning on fitting them to my next F-14E to be built.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basilisk2 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-04-25 14:52:08 +0000 UTC]
The upgrades I mentioned are essentially par for the course for hypothetical Tomcat improvements.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiba928 In reply to Basilisk2 [2017-04-26 07:11:37 +0000 UTC]
It's a shame they will never exist IRL. The Tomcat could have began its upgrade process, and possibly its multi-role metamorphisis as well, a decade earlier if not for short-sighted politicians.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basilisk2 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-04-26 16:52:17 +0000 UTC]
Except it couldn't have. In 1986, a decade before the Tomcat first flew with LANTIRN, the A-12 was still in development. The A-6E was still going strong. It had the Hornet and A-7 to support it in the strike role. The Tomcat was fully entrenched in the fighter role, with the F-14B having just begun to hit the fleet. There was no logical reason to strap bombs to F-14s and divert resources from their crucial fleet defense mission to play around with mud moving.
Fast forward 5 years to the cancellation of the A-12 and the scramble for an Intruder replacement. The idea of bringing out the Tomcat's latent bombing capability came back up, as an alternative option to the A-6F. However, the Tomcat, having been a purebred fighter for the entirety of its career, lacked critical systems that were necessary for a precision strike role in the 1990s, such as a ground mapping radar and a laser designator. The F-14D would have had the former, as its radar was derived from that of the F-15E, but there was also the elephant in the room to consider: The collapse of the Soviet Union. This, combined with the immense expenditures of the A-12, had thrown the Navy into a budget crunch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiba928 In reply to Basilisk2 [2017-05-02 10:16:34 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I do know about those, but the F-14B truly could have existed before 1980. Les Aspin of Wisconsin led the crusade to cancel the Pratt&Whitney F-401, and said the TF-30 was good enough. Like a true politician, he later criticized the Navy on the F-14, after a number of TF30-related crashes, of "buying a Turkey, not a Tomcat" and, of course, neglecting his role in neutering that fine design for so long. It's no small wonder that nearly every Tomcat crew had this opinion of him:"the Tom deserved better than the TF-30--they should court-martial those who said it'd be good enough"-John "Masher" Carrier.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Ronin201 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-05-02 18:32:34 +0000 UTC]
Pfft politicians have almost always been like that towards a number of projects and systems. The Nimitz-class is too big, the F-15 is too big, the E-3 is defenseless, The F-111 is too complex, etc etc etc. We could blather away for hours about that stuff. Or we could just kill some brain cells by listening to Will Lind or Mike Sparks/BlackTail Defense.
Anyways the US Navy, especially during the Cold War, was more concerned about things like keeping in the SIOP. So it focused on planes that could carry out nuclear strike such as the A-6 and the aborted A-6F and A-12. Like Sho said the F-14 had no reason to receive bomb-dropping upgrades until it was FORCED to. We had plenty of other platforms that were ready and able to move mud. With all the attack-orient planes sucking up money it's only natural that the fighter community would get the short end of the stick. And thus it'd be stuck with the lower-grade TF30s longer than it was originally planned to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Basilisk2 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-05-02 18:20:08 +0000 UTC]
That still doesn't change the doctrinal issue. There was no reason whatsoever to make the Tomcat a striker until the 1990s. Sure the Tomcat was built with a latent bombing capability, but it wasn't pursued for a reason; There was no REASON to pursue it. There was already an abundance of strike aircraft in the air wing, with the A-6, A-7, and F/A-18. There was no point in diverting from the fleet defense role to drop bombs. (Gee it's almost like I already said this)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kiba928 In reply to Ronin201 [2017-05-04 11:42:24 +0000 UTC]
Um, the point I was trying to make was that a decades worth of accidents and fatalities could have been prevented. Contrary to what Namco/Bandai says, the F-14B in either incarnation was not an air-to-ground uprade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Basilisk2 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-05-09 05:02:21 +0000 UTC]
No shit, Namdai's fucking retarded when it comes to aircraft descriptions. I'm 95% certain they're the reason a large number of people on the internet think the "B" in F-14B stands for "Bombcat."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ronin201 In reply to Kiba928 [2017-05-05 05:39:12 +0000 UTC]
"...the F-14B in either incarnation was not an air-to-ground [upgrade]."
Again, the F-14 suffered from the short end of the stick. The F-14 couldn't have reached the B standard before it did because the Navy emphasis was on attack. Especially when the post-Vietnam years saw a big draw-down and it wasn't until Reagan sent the defense budget up in the mid 80s (and wouldn't yah know that's when the F-14B finally came through?). Is it bad that the TF30s existed? Yes, but in the end the F-14 was still able to maintain its position as a premier fighter of its time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ronin201 [2017-04-08 16:25:50 +0000 UTC]
Actually been waiting a long time to see this. Glad to finally get a good side profile of the Killer Fishs' primary mount.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basilisk2 In reply to Ronin201 [2017-04-09 09:32:44 +0000 UTC]
Which is ironic since it sorta accidentally became their main.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basilisk2 In reply to Ronin201 [2017-04-09 19:56:40 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. Originally their primaries were the Mud Hen and Strike Viper. The whole "Fishes have Quickstrikes" thing came about because ONS happened in the middle of my "PROPHET OF GLORIOUS KITTY" phase.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1