HOME | DD

BlastWaves — Defiance-class Heavy Battleship by-nc-nd

#1950s #1952 #battleship #bb #blastwaves #class #crosssection #cutaway #defiance #fictional #fictitious #internal #internals #montana #ship #ships #steampowered #vehicle #vessel #warship #worldwar2 #worldwartwo #ww2 #battle_ship #internalview #cross_section #inside_view #shipcutaway #montanaclassbattleship #montana_class #battleship_cutaway #warship_cutaway #crosssections
Published: 2019-10-13 15:11:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 94405; Favourites: 1042; Downloads: 497
Redirect to original
Description A fictional design for an extremely large and heavily armored battleship, based primarily upon the unbuilt American Montana class of battleships.

This drawing depicts such a ship around 1953, with its anti-aircraft cannons still intact and its aircraft catapults removed for helicopter operations, much like that of the Iowa class battleships used during the Korean War.
---
Defiance-class Heavy Battleship
As the war between the Ostellan Republic and the Esternan Federation between the Atellan ocean intensified, it became apparent that the then currently fielded battleships of the Ostellan Navy (Archer-class, Typhoon-class, and Daring-class battleships) were obsolete by modern warship standards. This was due in part to being strictly limited in their construction by arms control treaties signed after the end of the First World War, despite costly modernization and refit programs to combat these effects. As a result, a program to develop a more modern and capable warship no longer limited by international treaties was quickly put in place. While initially many designers and shipbuilding companies approached the Ostellan government to design the next-generation warship, the Ostellan government and Navy ultimately chose to establish a new, specialized division dubbed the Ostellan Naval Committee of Battleship Research (ONCBR) to both design and build what would become known as the Defiance-class of battleships. By May of 1940 the first design was presented to the Centralized Committee of Ostellan Naval Warfare Research (CCONWR), featuring three triple-mount 15-inch gun turrets, 16 anti-aircraft guns, and four dual-purpose 5-inch cannons. This design would later be modified to have four 15-inch turrets and 18 anti-aircraft guns, and a few weeks later further changed to have 20 anti-aircraft guns and eight dual-purpose 5-inch guns. After a year later and nearly two dozen design iterations later, on June of 1941 a finalized design was presented and approved by the CCONWR for production at the North Superna naval yard, with two vessels being dubbed BB-52 Defiance and BB-53 Triumphant to be constructed. However, materials to actually build the two ships would not become available until December of 1942, as the majority of the steel and manufacturing force was being used in the construction of aircraft-carriers and smaller sized warships. 

Between July 1941 to January 1943, under the supervision of numerous high-ranking Ostellan Navy personnel, several changes would once again be made to the "finalized" design of the Defiance-class battleship. These changes included the refinement and lengthening of its hull, the addition of several dozen 20mm anti-aircraft guns, 16 inch sized cannons for its four main-battery gun turrets, and the addition of two more 5-inch dual-purpose turrets. Multiple changes would also be made to its internal configuration, curiously being the enlargement of the spaces for its Admiral and Captain's quarters, and more luxuriously equipped kitchens and pantries. While these changes would increase the price of both ships substantially, the design would still be approved for production with few complaints from high-ranking Ostellan Navy personnel.

By February of 1943, work had finally begun on constructing the first of the two battleships, though now bearing little resemblance to its 1941 design. Despite having a crew of approximately 8,000 workers continuously working around the clock, the first of the Defiance-class battleships would be launched in late 1947, nearly a year and a half after the end of the war in the Attelan ocean. Due to rather demanding labor and few breaks for its shipbuilders, worker strikes were common at the North Superna naval yard, often leading to week or even month long delays in finishing sections of each vessel. The naval yard also lacked the safety features of most Ostellan Republic shipyards, and as a result worker death or injury was a common occurrence caused usually by either collapsing cranes, falling equipment, debris, or more often than not personnel falling off the sides of the ship or dock walls due to a lack of issued safety harnesses. This would in turn cause more worker strikes and delays, with replacement personnel often choosing not to show up or apply to transfer to a safer, less overbearing shipyard. Despite all of this, the two battleships would continue to be built at the North Superna naval yard, as due to the size of the vessels (292.7 m) the North Superna naval yard was the only available and capable yard in Ostella large enough to both build and service the two warships, as well as keep the price of production relatively affordable. With the end of the war and the continuous worker strikes slowing production, the Ostellan government eventually opted to forcibly transfer personnel from other naval yards in the country to speed up the production of both of ships, nearly tripling the amount of active shipbuilding personnel from 8,000 to 22,000.

After nearly four years of continuous labor and technical difficulties, on December 21st of 1947, the first of the two commissioned battleships, BB-52 Defiance, would be launched from the North Superna naval yard at 9:43 AM. While it would eventually pass its shakedown trials successfully, due to a rather sudden oil shortage, the ship would quickly be sent back to its naval yard in March of 1948 and remain there until early February of 1949. The sister ship of Defiance, BB-53 Triumphant, would never reach full completion due to the 1948 oil shortage and would eventually be scrapped due to the Ostellan Navy ultimately never having the funds to operate more than one Defiance-class battleship at a time.

By the time BB-52 would officially be commissioned into Ostellan Navy service and begin patrol operations in Ostellan territory, the single operational Defiance-class battleship would quickly become obsolete with the developement of guided missiles and more advanced warships built by other countries.

Specifications:
Length (overall): 960 feet 6 inches (292.7 m)
Draft: 35 ft (10.66 m) (full load)
37 ft 9 in (11.51 m) (maximum)
Beam: 115 ft 6 in (35.23 m)
Displacement (standard): 70,000 tonnes
Speed: 31 knots
Complement: 2,633

Armor:
Main belt: 16.7 inches (424 mm)
Lower belt: 7.2–8.5 inches (183–216 mm) inclined 10°
Bulkheads: 18 inches (457 mm) forward, 15.25 inches (387 mm) aft
Barbettes: 21.3 inches (541 mm), 18 inches (457 mm) aft
Turret face: 22.5 inches (572 mm)
Conning tower: 14 in (355 mm)
Decks: 3.36 inches (85 mm), 8 in (203 mm), 0.63–1 inch (16–25 mm)

Armament (1952):
4 × triple 16-inch (406 mm)/50 cal turrets
10 × twin 5-inch (127 mm)/54 cal turrets
26 × quad Marloni 40 mm (1.574 in) anti-aircraft guns
74 × twin 20 mm (0.787 in) Konsa anti-aircraft cannons

Aviation facilities:
2 × aircraft catapults (1947)
4 × helicopters (1949)
Related content
Comments: 125

DoodlingYankee In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 20:07:19 +0000 UTC]

Outstanding Job! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to DoodlingYankee [2019-10-15 00:46:21 +0000 UTC]

Kind thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chrispy92 [2019-10-13 19:34:21 +0000 UTC]

Man, this is fan-fucking-tastic work man! You put a hell of a lot of detail into this baby and it shows.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Chrispy92 [2019-10-15 00:46:18 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, Chrispy! I'm glad you like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DarthBeverEater [2019-10-13 19:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Can you imagine trying to get from aft to stern in a hurry ? What a cool cut away though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to DarthBeverEater [2019-10-15 00:46:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I can imagine it would be pretty tiring.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

C05M0NAUT In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 19:14:04 +0000 UTC]

Holy hell man, I was expecting something good, but this completely blew my expectations out of the water. Fantastic job with the colors and all those little icons and flags and coats of arms across the sheet. And the cross section? Just wow. Great work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to C05M0NAUT [2019-10-15 00:46:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for your kind words, Cosmo! It was a long journey to make and finish it, but I'm glad to finally have it done and that you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Awsomejet3D In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 18:31:48 +0000 UTC]

Nice detail

Awsome pic XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Awsomejet3D [2019-10-15 00:45:47 +0000 UTC]

Kind thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Va1entin In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 18:22:43 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Va1entin [2019-10-15 00:45:45 +0000 UTC]

Cheers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Diana-Martinez In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 17:54:54 +0000 UTC]

Wow! nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Diana-Martinez [2019-10-15 00:45:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MNABKERNU In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 17:17:08 +0000 UTC]

Jesus Murphy. 

Alright, congratulations on becoming the 3rd member of the Big Boys.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to MNABKERNU [2019-10-15 00:45:39 +0000 UTC]

It's an honor to be a part of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Toravich12 In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 16:48:24 +0000 UTC]

If I didn't know that this was pixel work, from a distance I'd never guess. This is absolutely fantastic dude, the details are down to a beautifully fine point.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to Toravich12 [2019-10-15 00:45:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Toravich12 In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-15 01:59:42 +0000 UTC]

No problem at all, my man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TinkerTanker44432 In reply to ??? [2019-10-13 15:22:06 +0000 UTC]

10/10 would you mind I'f I used some parts of your ship for a project?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to TinkerTanker44432 [2019-10-15 00:45:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

I don't really have or intend to do a parts sheet for this, sorry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TinkerTanker44432 In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-15 02:36:33 +0000 UTC]

I could just kit-bash from this. I don't need a part sheet to complete my project, just your permission.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlastWaves In reply to TinkerTanker44432 [2019-10-15 14:43:33 +0000 UTC]

I would prefer if you made your own parts, as the ones I made for this ship are meant to be unique and designed specifically for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TinkerTanker44432 In reply to BlastWaves [2019-10-15 16:39:56 +0000 UTC]

Very well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |