HOME | DD

brentcherry β€” Infidelity

#adultery #buzzwords #cheating #consequences #debate #disagreement #equalrights #infidel #infidelity #liberty #logic #one #onemeaning #oppression #poor #punishment #reason #reasoning #speech #poorreasoning
Published: 2015-06-04 05:41:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 4562; Favourites: 46; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description UPDATE (March 30, 2016) - Fixed spelling on "monogamy".

Words have specific meanings. You can't throw around buzzwords and expect to either win an argument or make it seem more valid than it actually is. You also can't stretch their definitions to fit your position.

If youΒ need to do those in order to make your point valid, then the problem isn't the definition. It's your argument.
Related content
Comments: 17

Irukshi [2023-05-29 00:06:30 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MermaidNinja [2022-07-21 02:48:24 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to MermaidNinja [2022-07-21 07:54:14 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

TheJewishMarxist [2016-06-29 20:39:35 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, if a man makes a mistake he's considered a stud, but if a woman does it she's a skank. Β To me it should go both ways. Β I agree with this wholeheartedly. Β If only someone would slap Mrs. Sharkeesian with this

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to TheJewishMarxist [2016-06-30 06:54:10 +0000 UTC]

I'm not aware of Anita making an argument about infidelity, thought it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheJewishMarxist In reply to brentcherry [2016-06-30 16:47:39 +0000 UTC]

yeah, she's crazy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sanjouin-dacapo [2016-03-31 02:49:50 +0000 UTC]

Very true. Too bad Zoe won't read this.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to sanjouin-dacapo [2016-03-31 11:29:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, shame.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SigmaPoe In reply to brentcherry [2016-04-01 05:12:01 +0000 UTC]

Nah Eron better this wya.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to SigmaPoe [2016-04-01 11:04:28 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Astrall99 [2016-03-30 08:22:56 +0000 UTC]

I think misspell "Monogamy".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to Astrall99 [2016-03-30 21:03:29 +0000 UTC]

Shit! You're right! I'll fix that now! Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Astrall99 In reply to brentcherry [2016-03-30 21:28:22 +0000 UTC]

YW

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SigmaPoe [2015-07-11 09:09:25 +0000 UTC]

*cough*quin*cough *

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to SigmaPoe [2015-07-11 10:13:25 +0000 UTC]

Yep!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rogeratit [2015-06-11 06:40:04 +0000 UTC]

This could head off unreasonable disagreements, as seems it's purpose.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

brentcherry In reply to rogeratit [2015-06-11 07:18:43 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0