HOME | DD

BryanSyme β€” The Trickster

#dd #dragons #dungeons #elf #fantasy #half #magic #magician #pathfinder #sorcerer #thief #trickster #wizard
Published: 2016-02-19 16:25:22 +0000 UTC; Views: 20339; Favourites: 262; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Work done for kobold press. Look how he glows. Glowing equals magic apparently.
Related content
Comments: 24

JasonFrost7 [2018-12-01 02:39:44 +0000 UTC]

wonderful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to JasonFrost7 [2018-12-03 15:51:49 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChristopherLeif [2016-07-14 03:28:00 +0000 UTC]

I see the point about the glow. Β That was actually more common in the earliest editions of Dungeons & Dragons. Β Since 3.X it's not been used as much. Β Still, for purposes of illustrations, it's really the only way that I can think of to make the magical nature of an item or being visually evident.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

ChristopherLeif In reply to ChristopherLeif [2016-08-28 15:08:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, maybe so, but Jackson's movies are still the best cinematic treatment of that book (and the Lord of the Rings) to date.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChristopherLeif In reply to ChristopherLeif [2016-08-28 15:04:21 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, maybe so, but Jackson's movies are still the best cinematic treatment of those books to date.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BryanSyme In reply to ChristopherLeif [2016-07-14 14:17:58 +0000 UTC]

I can think of many other ways. They're just not so blatant. To me it seems like a visual copout. The one Ring didn't glow. Neither did Storm Bringer or Excalibur.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ChristopherLeif In reply to BryanSyme [2016-08-05 21:03:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, Stormbringer didn't exactly need to glow with all the moaning, slurping and other vocalization as 'he' sucked down souls. Β The enchanted nature of that blade was obvious in other ways. Β The 'special' nature of Excalibur was also patently obvious because of its being held aloft from the bosom of the waters by a disembodied arm. Β Admittedly, these are much more creative than just glowing, and it wouldn't take a great deal of creativity to replace the annoying glow with some other feature like runes, either being too heavy or too light for its perceived mass, or being made of a strange metal or other, possibly much more freaky, substance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to ChristopherLeif [2016-08-06 15:39:43 +0000 UTC]

Totally agree. Although many of those options are not so easy to illustrate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NecroTechno In reply to BryanSyme [2016-08-05 19:26:13 +0000 UTC]

Well, in the movies you got pretty glowing text on the One Ring when exposed to fire...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to NecroTechno [2016-08-05 19:54:00 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and we all saw where stuff like that led Peter Jackson.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChristopherLeif In reply to BryanSyme [2016-08-05 20:14:11 +0000 UTC]

You lost me here - where did it lead him, exactly? Β The Elvish script on the ring that exposure to fire caused to appear is well-documented Tolkien canon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to ChristopherLeif [2016-08-06 15:44:14 +0000 UTC]

The hobbit movies. With such a huge overreliance on CGI.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MarcRadle [2016-02-21 17:34:58 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes Art Directors actually know what they are talking about ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MarcRadle In reply to MarcRadle [2016-02-22 02:14:50 +0000 UTC]

Yep, one and the same ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BryanSyme In reply to MarcRadle [2016-02-21 19:28:31 +0000 UTC]

Marc is that you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MarcRadle In reply to BryanSyme [2016-02-24 01:24:32 +0000 UTC]

It sure is - in all myΒ gaudy, 'glowy' glory ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to MarcRadle [2016-02-24 21:32:18 +0000 UTC]

Sweet!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AquaticJM [2016-02-19 18:31:04 +0000 UTC]

The glowing was actually a nice touch! Really cool piece!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to AquaticJM [2016-02-20 17:05:34 +0000 UTC]

Come on, don't prove my art directory right.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Birdtear [2016-02-19 16:58:52 +0000 UTC]

oh this is cool dude ! specially that treasure chest...*where to find it !*
the color and effects are nicely done

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to Birdtear [2016-02-20 17:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I kind of think it looks a bit too gaudy myself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Birdtear In reply to BryanSyme [2016-02-20 17:18:42 +0000 UTC]

what part ?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BryanSyme In reply to Birdtear [2016-02-21 00:10:31 +0000 UTC]

Well overall, the colors on the character are too saturated for my liking. He's supposed to be a magical thief, but to me he looks more like a court jester in that outfit. And I am not a fan of making things glow to show that their magic. It seems to Disney.

But people seem to like that sort of thing and it sells. So I can't fault my client for wanting it that way.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Birdtear In reply to BryanSyme [2016-02-21 08:02:50 +0000 UTC]

oh i know the feeling ! happened to me alot... last of it was when a costumer asked for a logo and his idea turned out... well not my type

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0