HOME | DD

captshade — USS Billy Mitchell TMP Multi-View

Published: 2011-10-19 05:36:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 2854; Favourites: 47; Downloads: 172
Redirect to original
Description The Billy Mitchell Class Super Carrier is a TMP / Refit design by me. And is based off of the TOS version by John "Marcus Starkiller" Bandow.

The ship is named after General William "Billy" Mitchell, "father" of the U.S. Air Force. And as such, the hull numbers are the year when USAF became it's own branch, separate from the U.S. Army.
Related content
Comments: 20

TheAtomicDog [2017-10-22 21:25:55 +0000 UTC]

Mmmm. I dunno. Needs hangar decks.

And a thumbs up for using LN-66 engines. This big beast will need all the oomph it can get.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to TheAtomicDog [2017-10-22 22:05:49 +0000 UTC]

I know...32 seems on the low side.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAtomicDog [2014-10-01 23:20:28 +0000 UTC]

It's the Grand Hotel!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to TheAtomicDog [2014-10-02 20:03:15 +0000 UTC]

A bit big, I agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bluecruiser [2014-02-08 18:21:29 +0000 UTC]

The number should be 1947, other then that interesting design

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to Bluecruiser [2014-02-08 22:43:00 +0000 UTC]

Fixed, and thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NRE86 [2012-02-24 21:24:05 +0000 UTC]

OK so out of a lot of Federation Carrier designs, I have to say overall I really like the design. I guess my only criticism with the design is two things. First, the nacelles. Just the two, seem out of place to me and I just don't personally feel they flow with the design. I think backing them up so that the struts are between bays 32 and 30 and then added a middle nacelle or two more near the from would make it look a bit more stable. However, technically wise I suppose its not necessary but just visually, in my opinion it would make it more appealing.

Secondly, from the frontal view, the entire rear of the ship beyond the saucer section looks...square. Is this indeed the shape of the rear section or just a bad angle visual? I feel like the rear section shouldn't be square, it should have more of a curve to it both from the top and from the bottom, to fit in line a bit better with the saucer section.

Beyond that criticism, I have to say this is the best put together carrier for starfleet that I have so far found. Its not quite there for me, but still a very visually stunning piece that I must say I do like a lot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to NRE86 [2012-02-24 22:22:03 +0000 UTC]

Tried to keep in line with the original TOS version. And yeah, square.

But glad you liked most of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NRE86 In reply to captshade [2012-02-25 00:30:31 +0000 UTC]

Ah well still, best carrier design I've seen overall. Most of the ones that I've come across before yours either look completely awkward or look so far from a traditional federation ship design that I'm surprise they can even suggest is being one lol.

I also saw your Galactic-inspired carrier and I really like that one a lot. Very well designed and actually think if I could, I'd suggest the federation look into building it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to NRE86 [2012-02-25 01:03:18 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I thought it came out well.

Glad you liked it. I like doing cross-over designs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NRE86 In reply to captshade [2012-02-25 19:17:23 +0000 UTC]

I have to say your designs in the carrier class have really inspired me at trying my own had at this. Any chance I could have your permission to use some of your work as basis of my own design?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to NRE86 [2012-02-26 00:42:49 +0000 UTC]

Help yourself. Just credit where applicable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NRE86 In reply to captshade [2012-02-26 01:47:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and certainly will!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zucca-Xerfantes [2011-10-19 19:38:07 +0000 UTC]

I was about to say 'MITCHELL!' Well named! It's very big and very wide!

If you don't get the reference, that's okay. Kinda obscure, but any MST3K fan would know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2011-10-19 19:41:45 +0000 UTC]

Could have named it "McCloud"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MarcusStarkiller [2011-10-19 13:33:47 +0000 UTC]

Love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to MarcusStarkiller [2011-10-19 18:37:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks...Glad you approve.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arenafighter [2011-10-19 09:20:08 +0000 UTC]

Really Cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to arenafighter [2011-10-19 18:38:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I think it turned out rather well, myself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

arenafighter In reply to captshade [2011-10-19 21:13:13 +0000 UTC]

No Problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0