HOME | DD

captshade — USS Tritium Multi-View

Published: 2012-04-20 01:48:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 2506; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 212
Redirect to original
Description The Tritium Class Battlecruiser is a pre TOS design by Rick Sternbach, for Stan and Fred Goldstein's book "Star Trek: Spaceflight Chronology"

The Tritium Class has the distinction of being the Federation's poster child of how NOT to build a starship.
Related content
Comments: 21

galaxy1701d [2012-12-16 21:48:49 +0000 UTC]

Oh, yes, the notorious Tritium-class! I remember this vessel. If I remember right, her crews LOATHED her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to galaxy1701d [2012-12-16 22:10:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, she had a tendency to fly out of control when at warp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wontan [2012-07-28 23:51:20 +0000 UTC]

I've passed many hours looking for a 3D view of the Tritium class.Now I have it in color!.Great artwork,thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to Wontan [2012-07-29 03:32:05 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. And thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dantrekfan48 [2012-06-28 20:41:20 +0000 UTC]

*Looks like something from Flash Gordan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to dantrekfan48 [2012-06-28 20:46:54 +0000 UTC]

It does. But it's an old design that made it into a pseudo-fan publication.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dantrekfan48 In reply to captshade [2012-06-28 21:00:57 +0000 UTC]

Imagine that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dantrekfan48 [2012-06-28 20:40:28 +0000 UTC]

Say something at a Flash Gordon. Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Highwayhoss [2012-04-30 17:21:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, the "Edsel" of Starfleet. Nice pic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to Highwayhoss [2012-04-30 18:41:32 +0000 UTC]

Heh. Though to be fair...The Edsel were badly marketed. And they were built using a combination of Ford and Mercury parts, making maintenance rather hit and miss. The Ford Edsel was, otherwise, a solid car.

Where as the Tritium couldn't even go to warp, with out spinning out of control.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Highwayhoss In reply to captshade [2012-05-02 14:21:01 +0000 UTC]

Good point. We really need a good RL ship as the equivalent to this clunker.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

galaxy1701d In reply to Highwayhoss [2012-12-16 21:53:18 +0000 UTC]

Well, the British and French have come up with a number of awful near-misses in the past.

For example, "Fisher's Folly," the so-called Large Light Cruisers Furious, Courageous and Glorious were attempts to stick gigantic extra leftover guns from the dreadnought battleship building program onto enlarged light cruiser hulls. The British First Sea Lord at the time, the controversial and flamboyant Admiral Jackie Fisher, absolutely believed that armor could be sacrificed in favor of speed, big guns and a high rate of fire and so he had these ships built to be very fast, heavy-hitting raiders. Unfortunately, warships at the time were also carefully balanced - you were only supposed to carry guns that your armor could resist, and cruiser armor was paper to battleship grade guns, making it almost impossible for the Royal Navy to really find a good use for these ships. All 3 were eventually converted to aircraft carriers, saving the RN a lot of face as their crews considered them to be all but useless mockeries.

Then you've got the old French predreadnought battleship Hoche, also known derisively by her crews as the Grand Hotel because her gigantic superstructure resembled a floating palace. She wound up being under-performing, under-powered (if I remember right), unmaneuverable and massively top-heavy and was a very, very unpopular design among the French, who favored speed even more than the English did (the French school of design believed dash, ambition, unpredictability and sheer aggression could overcome any lack of weaponry or armor - and they eventually paid dearly for that by the end of WW1).

So, there are examples out there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mbc12-5-58 [2012-04-20 16:44:41 +0000 UTC]

It can do Warp 8.5.

Unfortunately, it can only do Warp 8.5 backwards and in high heels.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to mbc12-5-58 [2012-04-20 18:08:10 +0000 UTC]

Ginger Rogers she ain't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mbc12-5-58 In reply to captshade [2012-04-21 17:50:44 +0000 UTC]

I doff my hat to thee, sirrah, on thy appreciation of my bon mot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fum316 [2012-04-20 14:19:30 +0000 UTC]

Coool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to fum316 [2012-04-20 18:08:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fum316 In reply to captshade [2012-04-20 19:58:48 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

arenafighter [2012-04-20 08:26:05 +0000 UTC]

Very Cool! thanks for posting!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jtkirk1701 [2012-04-20 02:48:02 +0000 UTC]

Nice ship great job captshade

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

captshade In reply to jtkirk1701 [2012-04-20 03:25:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0