HOME | DD

crystalizedfox — Stamp for Okamifan

Published: 2009-04-04 05:27:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 654; Favourites: 10; Downloads: 28
Redirect to original
Description "I have always wondered. Why does Nintendo not just give the Pokemon the correct anatomy? It's not like it's going to destroy a child's mind to see a sheath on an Eevee. For one thing, Pokemon are essentially just ANIMALS. Kids, and everyone else, see real-life animals every day, and know what they look like. If anything, not giving them the correct anatomy is going to CONFUSE kids, because they'll wonder why what they're seeing on TV does not look the way it would in real life. Furthermore, in the anime series AND the games, every single Pokemon is reffered to as "it" even though they APPARENTLY have genders. Unless they drop the "it" crap, there is no way to tell a Pokemon's gender at all in the anime/cartoon. If anything, adding the proper anatomy would be a HELPFUL thing."

Overdue stamp for
I hope I didn't stray too far from what you wanted. I can add a fram to it if you want, but that will have to wait until tomorrow. I have to go to craft fair for Allies Club (GSLB) tomorrow.

Put this in your journal if you support this! Don't have a subby? Fav it!
Related content
Comments: 18

StephaniaArts [2016-04-20 11:09:14 +0000 UTC]

I wish more ppl could think like you! It is so hard to tell the difference between the genders on here on OCs sometimes! I don´t get why ppl are so afraid of drawing correct anatomy! It is natural, c´mon... :/ doesn´t mean it is "porn!" Just good anatomy so you can tell what the hell a creature is. And makes it that more convincing too. A male = Penis / Prepuce and testicals. Female = Bewbs and vag. 

Now I can understand if ppl shy away from drawing aroused genitalia which is for pornographic purposes, but normal, un-aroused genitalia shouldn´t in my mind be an issue. Ofc said genitalia is kept in proportion and not grossly exaggerated to insane lvls. 

Ppl are artistic cowards. Genitalia can be stylized in a great way without comprimising the "cartoon" aspect, so I am not a buyer of the "it´s mah stylistic choice baawwww!" comment that ppl often make when shying away from adding afromented parts to animal/human. It´s just sad really, that some artists just censor parts which are natural like that, even manga pros. 

lol genitala actually affects posture/poses but many forget this I find as they neglect learning to draw genitalia in the first place. 

This whole rant is basically my soapbox on correct anatomy and that more artists need to strive to master it first and not be afraid of genitala.

That´s why I draw ALL genitalia in my works no matter manga, cartoon, semi-real, clothed, furred etc.   I wish more ppl would.. 

*thank you*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MukotsusPoison [2011-07-22 19:56:38 +0000 UTC]

I believe it is the correct grammar, as to why Pokemon are referred to as an "it". They're like pets dogs, and cats, despite gender are referred to as "its". I never really agreed with it but thats how it goes.

Now about the reproductive organ buisness, its a kid's cartoon or game I guess. I don't think children really think about sheaths enough to realize how unrealistic it is. Same reason there is not blood for the most part in cartoons. Its like asking why can't you see Sonic or Tail's sheaths and testicles. I imagine it'd only increase the amounts of rule 34 anyway

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Meruseitai [2011-06-07 06:42:52 +0000 UTC]

theyre CARTOON animals. why would this be needed?! D: i think it would take a really stupid kid to get confused by the lack of a dick on their pikachu...

most kids arent so dumb that they would think pokemon = realistic animal. pokemon are cool BECAUSE they arent realistic!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nothofagus-obliqua [2011-06-07 04:23:02 +0000 UTC]

i find it way weirder than eevees lay eggs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nothofagus-obliqua In reply to Nothofagus-obliqua [2011-06-07 04:23:29 +0000 UTC]

*that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Whakahuri In reply to Nothofagus-obliqua [2015-03-29 00:12:34 +0000 UTC]

yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Duckstapler [2010-10-31 22:03:38 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah I just can't WAIT to see Snorlax and Wheezing and Hypno and Nosepass and Magmortar with their business hanging all over the place.

Seriously though it's disturbing that this matter is important enough to you that you felt the need to make a stamp for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crystalizedfox In reply to Duckstapler [2010-11-03 02:12:33 +0000 UTC]

My personal views aren't being expressed here, only the views of the individual whom the stamp was made for and those shares the same idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chive-sword [2010-07-28 23:11:18 +0000 UTC]

Theres no need for dicks on pokemon. It's uneccesary. Besides, usually their fur covers their bizzo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nothofagus-obliqua In reply to Chive-sword [2011-06-07 04:22:20 +0000 UTC]

this
also, considering that every pokemon lays eggs, even those who look like perfect mammals, maybe they have cloaca.... then again, why anyone cares about Pokemon reproductive organs

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Avesy [2009-04-07 00:17:21 +0000 UTC]

rofl nice stamp... I never thought of that (sadly).

I castrate most of my characters xD its uhh artistic liberty >.>

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

crystalizedfox In reply to Avesy [2009-04-09 03:25:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks XD

Um...yes...let's go with that...
~shifty eyes~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Okamifan In reply to Avesy [2009-04-07 00:24:44 +0000 UTC]

Well nobody said you don't have the right to xD

We're just trying to find people who support anatomical correctness is all. We're not attempting to cram anything down the throats of people who don't draw that way...it's their choice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

todd-fox [2009-04-04 14:09:35 +0000 UTC]

aye but there will always be prides......why not create a ecchi version of pkmn?

How do you get away with watching pkmn in public?

watch it in japanesse and pretend to understand!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crystalizedfox In reply to todd-fox [2009-04-05 17:23:20 +0000 UTC]

That's the way of the otaku XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Okamifan [2009-04-04 05:33:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks dude! You did an awesome job on this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crystalizedfox In reply to Okamifan [2009-04-04 05:36:37 +0000 UTC]


No problem!
Sorry about the name mix up

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Okamifan In reply to crystalizedfox [2009-04-04 05:37:25 +0000 UTC]

It's alright xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0