HOME | DD

davemetlesits β€” Tribute to Apollo 11

Published: 2009-07-17 18:09:03 +0000 UTC; Views: 7241; Favourites: 121; Downloads: 340
Redirect to original
Description Forty years ago, the inhabitants of a small, bluish planet in the outer arm of the Milky Way Galaxy were looking toward the planet's lone natural satellite. The children of this planet were racing to where no man has gone before...


Mesh by Starship and Cassio, Max 9 conversion by and me
Related content
Comments: 49

Mister-Crool [2017-11-06 16:24:21 +0000 UTC]

The final frontier.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Phenometron [2017-11-01 03:17:24 +0000 UTC]

You did great with the Enterprise-B.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DalekOfBorg [2013-03-18 18:52:03 +0000 UTC]

I don't understand why, but the flared bits on the Enterprise-B's lower hull make her look a little like a maritime ship.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpiderTrekfan616 In reply to DalekOfBorg [2013-12-24 21:10:08 +0000 UTC]

I think that was one of the intentions when the Enterprise-B was designed, They were also made so that there would be no need to cut into the actual model during the scene when the Ribbon Gouges a huge chunk of the ship during it's escape. Unfortunately the glue that they used damaged the model and so the pieces had to be left on which is why the U.S.S.Β Lakota (DS9:Β Paradise Lost)Β is seen with the Enterprise-B additions.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SulliMike23 [2009-10-20 03:11:04 +0000 UTC]

If we can land a man on the moon, Mars shouldn't be a problem. Hopefully with projects of the future solving that problem, mankind will once again pioneer into a new space age.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to SulliMike23 [2009-10-20 18:08:44 +0000 UTC]

I think that the Apollo landigns were fabricated. If they can't launch them now, how could have they done it 40 years ago?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Turdy1 In reply to davemetlesits [2013-09-26 16:56:40 +0000 UTC]

Because NASA had funding. Β They get a tiny fraction of what they had in the 60's.

Like they said in The Right Stuff "No bucks, no Buck Rogers."

There's also the issue of many of the companies that built components being out of business, or blueprints having been lost to time.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SulliMike23 In reply to davemetlesits [2009-10-20 18:34:20 +0000 UTC]

Well I don't think they were.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to SulliMike23 [2009-10-20 22:33:52 +0000 UTC]

I don't know. It seems unlikely that if the could make it 40 years ago, they're struggling now to make it again. Why don't they dust off the old designs, update them with modern technology and voila. They can't, because the things never worked. nmanned landing, that's okay. Manned? No, I don't think so.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

hmsnike In reply to davemetlesits [2013-02-05 07:16:54 +0000 UTC]

I don't think it's a matter of "can't make it" anymore as much as it is no one wants to.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Wolfman-053 [2009-08-17 15:16:15 +0000 UTC]

Excellent.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to Wolfman-053 [2009-08-17 18:41:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolfman-053 In reply to davemetlesits [2009-08-17 18:46:02 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sakka0 [2009-07-21 21:07:59 +0000 UTC]

Soooo lovely, and a perfect tribute!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to sakka0 [2009-07-22 17:50:52 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bk13garbageman [2009-07-20 01:36:22 +0000 UTC]

Cool!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to bk13garbageman [2009-07-20 13:03:41 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bk13garbageman In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-23 12:17:23 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

chimera335 [2009-07-18 22:13:56 +0000 UTC]

Very cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to chimera335 [2009-07-19 00:13:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Carthoris [2009-07-18 14:01:08 +0000 UTC]

Where *has* the time gone...?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to Carthoris [2009-07-18 19:54:11 +0000 UTC]

I have asked this myself in the past five years so many times...


(sorry, I'm in a melancholic mood now)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Carthoris In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-18 23:37:30 +0000 UTC]

Trust me, I understand.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Night-Miner [2009-07-18 03:54:14 +0000 UTC]

"Let me guess; Tuesday?"

Heh, in all seriousness this is a beautiful image and a fitting tribute to all those who made the landing possible

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to Night-Miner [2009-07-18 11:53:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Night-Miner In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-18 11:56:02 +0000 UTC]

Your most welcome, keep up the great work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Grayphus [2009-07-18 03:06:04 +0000 UTC]

Nice Moon! Beauty 1703-B!! That majestic image!!

" That's one small step for a Man! One giant leap for mankind "!

A fantastic moment for our species!!!!
The one that me more I appreciate is the sentence written in a plate left at the place of the landing of the ship!

" Here the men of the planet Earth put for the first the feet in the Moon. Julho de 1969. We came in peace on behalf of all the humanity ".

I have a lot of pride of this!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to Grayphus [2009-07-18 11:54:44 +0000 UTC]

Maybe our generation will witness the first Mars landing. Ant it'll probably be a Chinese one

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Grayphus In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-18 21:51:20 +0000 UTC]

A Chinese? And why no a Chinese woman??
When us, humanity, we are at Mars, I wait that a woman to step in him surface first.
In the Moon, feminine, the men stepped first! In Mars, masculine, I think that for symmetry, a woman is the correct, on this hour. I simply think that would be very good.
Then we decided when we are Venus!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to Grayphus [2009-07-19 00:17:50 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm... interesting. The problem would be that women have lesser bone mass than men and microgravity really pots hard strains on the bones. And don't forget Aunt Flo, and that in zero G...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CaptainBarringer [2009-07-18 00:44:50 +0000 UTC]

cool i love named enterprise

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to CaptainBarringer [2009-07-18 11:56:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wingzero-01-custom [2009-07-18 00:33:43 +0000 UTC]

nice very nice indeed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to wingzero-01-custom [2009-07-18 11:56:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

overseer [2009-07-18 00:25:14 +0000 UTC]

Epicness!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to overseer [2009-07-18 11:56:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XRaiderV1 [2009-07-17 23:27:35 +0000 UTC]

awesome shot!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to XRaiderV1 [2009-07-18 00:06:29 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gopotter [2009-07-17 19:43:43 +0000 UTC]

WOWSICLKES!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to gopotter [2009-07-17 19:43:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

madmick2299 [2009-07-17 19:01:17 +0000 UTC]

that is awesome work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to madmick2299 [2009-07-17 19:06:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

madmick2299 In reply to davemetlesits [2009-07-17 19:12:12 +0000 UTC]

your very welcome ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NCC-2357 [2009-07-17 18:39:56 +0000 UTC]

Dude, touching tribute but also one hell of a render!! This is absolutely beautiful, and I'm not saying that just because I'm in love with the Excelsior either. lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to NCC-2357 [2009-07-17 18:45:02 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PaladinArtea [2009-07-17 18:37:15 +0000 UTC]

sweet job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to PaladinArtea [2009-07-17 18:44:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gunmoon [2009-07-17 18:10:56 +0000 UTC]

Wow! SO MAJESTIC! GOOD WORK DAVE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

davemetlesits In reply to gunmoon [2009-07-17 18:14:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0