HOME | DD

Description
Anthropomorphic characters are character designs that combine human features with animal features, but are not animals. Anthros are not actually animals. Not even a little bit. Just because they're based on animals doesn't make them animals. Animals do not have human characteristics like hands or two feet.

All of the canon information about Sonic and the rest are referred them as anthropomorphic, so this big discussion people love to spark with someonereally makes no sense. Why are you are folks get triggered? Hate to be corrected by someone else? I'm not sure must of you spend a lot of time correcting others when you don't like someone doing that to you.

Furries don't identify as animals; their identify is based on with animals, but they are not animals. So those discussion people have that Sonic x Elise or any Human x Furry/Anthro is Zoophilia/Bestiality is just dumb. Sonic isn't a actual hedgehog, Sally isn't a actual squirrel, Knuckles isn't an actual echidna, Lola Bunny isn't a actual rabbit, Crash isn't an actual bandicoot.

Just because a Furry/Anthro is based on a animal it doesn't make them a animal. They are based on a animal, but they are not animals. They are anthropomorphic not animals. There is a huge different between them.

===

Note: This is was always something I want to do it 8 Years ago during the Furry Community Ages where people have discussion over Anthro being Animals. I make this now because I rewatch some old videos from PlayfurCinema, and I come across my old comment where I correct him by saying that Sally Acorn is not a actual animal. But he got mad that I corrected him, which doesn't surprise me. Most popular or semi-popular Content Creators, especially from the Commentary Community, hate being criticized. They like to criticize everyone else, but suddenly it happened to them they get triggered for it.

Anyway don't go to PlayfurCinema and attack him, I didn't do this for that reason.

Description
Anthropomorphic characters are character designs that combine human features with animal features, but are not animals. Anthros are not actually animals. Not even a little bit. Just because they're based on animals doesn't make them animals. Animals do not have human characteristics like hands or two feet.

All of the canon information about Sonic and the rest are referred them as anthropomorphic, so this big discussion people love to spark with someonereally makes no sense. Why are you are folks get triggered? Hate to be corrected by someone else? I'm not sure must of you spend a lot of time correcting others when you don't like someone doing that to you.

Furries don't identify as animals; their identify is based on with animals, but they are not animals. So those discussion people have that Sonic x Elise or any Human x Furry/Anthro is Zoophilia/Bestiality is just dumb. Sonic isn't a actual hedgehog, Sally isn't a actual squirrel, Knuckles isn't an actual echidna, Lola Bunny isn't a actual rabbit, Crash isn't an actual bandicoot.

Just because a Furry/Anthro is based on a animal it doesn't make them a animal. They are based on a animal, but they are not animals. They are anthropomorphic not animals. There is a huge different between them.

===

Note: This is was always something I want to do it 8 Years ago during the Furry Community Ages where people have discussion over Anthro being Animals. I make this now because I rewatch some old videos from PlayfurCinema, and I come across my old comment where I correct him by saying that Sally Acorn is not a actual animal. But he got mad that I corrected him, which doesn't surprise me. Most popular or semi-popular Content Creators, especially from the Commentary Community, hate being criticized. They like to criticize everyone else, but suddenly it happened to them they get triggered for it.

Anyway don't go to PlayfurCinema and attack him, I didn't do this for that reason.