HOME | DD

Dshark — Dshark's Signature Tutorial

Published: 2006-09-08 02:09:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 61524; Favourites: 164; Downloads: 1703
Redirect to original
Description Hey everyone, I'm done with my first tutorial! I tried to make this easy to follow for beginners but if you have any questions comments or concerns at all, leave a comment or note me! I spend way to much time in front of my computer so I'm nearly always there to help! Enjoy!

Peace,
~Devin
Related content
Comments: 248

goo-fan In reply to ??? [2006-12-22 23:22:30 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, deal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to goo-fan [2006-12-23 01:29:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Creamlistner11092 In reply to ??? [2006-12-19 18:55:08 +0000 UTC]

Don't like It much, Its not one of the better sigs Ive seen... Definitely not abstract.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Burnin-Bridges08 In reply to Creamlistner11092 [2008-05-09 01:42:43 +0000 UTC]

hey now dont be an ass

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dshark In reply to Creamlistner11092 [2006-12-19 23:05:56 +0000 UTC]

Well that was just a practical aplication of the technique. Yeah its not a great sig but there are other neat things to do with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TrueTenorMan In reply to ??? [2006-12-19 14:52:18 +0000 UTC]

It's no biggie, really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to TrueTenorMan [2006-12-19 23:06:09 +0000 UTC]

Pardon me?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TrueTenorMan In reply to Dshark [2006-12-20 14:16:21 +0000 UTC]

It's not that great of a tutorial.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to TrueTenorMan [2006-12-20 22:22:27 +0000 UTC]

Well thanx for telling me that without any explanation jerk.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TrueTenorMan In reply to Dshark [2006-12-21 14:04:38 +0000 UTC]

I don't think explanations are required for commenting on Deviations.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to TrueTenorMan [2006-12-21 20:39:29 +0000 UTC]

Well, I think in some situations explainations are required, otherwise people might think YOU ARE A DOUCHE. So please, if you are going to say you dont think somthing is very good, please say why or keep your comments to yourself. Thanx

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TrueTenorMan In reply to Dshark [2006-12-27 14:42:42 +0000 UTC]

So, by not explaining my opinion, that makes me a douche? Wow... you need to lower your standards, man. This is DA, not a review for the New York Times.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

iludelirium In reply to TrueTenorMan [2007-02-21 02:41:14 +0000 UTC]

meh this sig tutorial defenately kicks
this sig's [link]
ass

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

TrueTenorMan In reply to iludelirium [2007-02-22 23:08:56 +0000 UTC]

Calling me an "ass" and saying how bad my sig was is "triend not to" offend me? LMAO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iludelirium In reply to TrueTenorMan [2007-02-23 00:05:01 +0000 UTC]

i never called you an ass...
meh...I'm sorry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TrueTenorMan In reply to iludelirium [2007-02-26 13:58:32 +0000 UTC]

You wrote:

"meh this sig tutorial defenately kicks
this sig's [link]
ass"

'nuff said.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iludelirium In reply to TrueTenorMan [2007-02-26 15:03:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm still sorry you think youre just good enough to criticize others the way you're criticizing this tutorial. But meh its my opinion...doesn't have to be taken serious at all. Once again I'm sorry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TrueTenorMan In reply to iludelirium [2007-02-27 20:38:47 +0000 UTC]

What? I can't have an opinion? Nowhere on DA does it say, "You can only leave positive comments." If you open it up for comments, expect good AND bad. I do the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iludelirium In reply to TrueTenorMan [2007-02-27 23:53:08 +0000 UTC]

I agree
I was wrong. May be i just dont like you at all .
Have a nice day

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to iludelirium [2007-09-21 19:56:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanx for the support dude. That guy is an ass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TrueTenorMan In reply to iludelirium [2007-02-22 13:43:16 +0000 UTC]

Are you kidding me? They're completely different styles you moron. And that's what the user wanted, smart-ass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iludelirium In reply to TrueTenorMan [2007-02-22 18:21:21 +0000 UTC]

Im sorry if i offended you in any way.
I triend not to.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dshark In reply to TrueTenorMan [2006-12-27 18:15:46 +0000 UTC]

People MIGHT think your a douche. But saying that sucks and thats it, is just mean. If you havent noticed 99% of reviews are positive or are critical and explain themselves. It's dA, this site was founded upon being supportive of other peoples art. Whether that means encouragement or telling others how they can improve.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheRealNeix In reply to ??? [2006-12-11 05:16:18 +0000 UTC]

I will try this soon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to TheRealNeix [2006-12-11 23:03:58 +0000 UTC]

Groovy post yer results

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheRealNeix In reply to Dshark [2006-12-12 01:00:20 +0000 UTC]

will do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to TheRealNeix [2006-12-12 02:50:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnimeCatLaury In reply to ??? [2006-12-07 17:43:31 +0000 UTC]

This is cool. Now to get photoshop. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to AnimeCatLaury [2006-12-07 22:37:42 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha. It helps. But thanx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gfx-ownage In reply to ??? [2006-12-07 01:01:52 +0000 UTC]

im really liking this, you would be quite an asset to my NEW forum, its in the building stage and could use stuff like this to boost it if your interested the link is [link] join if u feel you should.

ty and good job

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to gfx-ownage [2006-12-07 03:04:08 +0000 UTC]

Id love too. Your link doesnt work though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gfx-ownage In reply to Dshark [2006-12-07 18:15:36 +0000 UTC]

[link] it should work if not its gfx-ownage.net

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to gfx-ownage [2006-12-07 22:36:51 +0000 UTC]

Gracias. All joined up now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PeaSoup241 In reply to ??? [2006-12-06 08:41:01 +0000 UTC]

I havn't watched it yet, but OMG, it looks cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to PeaSoup241 [2006-12-06 14:11:48 +0000 UTC]

Watched what? Huh? I'm confuzed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeaSoup241 In reply to Dshark [2006-12-07 06:55:30 +0000 UTC]

your tute. Oh........i get it. Its not like a flash movie or anything, its a picture!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to PeaSoup241 [2006-12-07 12:41:27 +0000 UTC]

Flash movie....? What? *still confused*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PeaSoup241 In reply to Dshark [2006-12-08 05:46:24 +0000 UTC]

I thought your tutorial was a flash movie, you know, like on albinoblacksheep or something.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to PeaSoup241 [2006-12-08 12:38:38 +0000 UTC]

Uhhh... Ok then.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

krazykohla In reply to ??? [2006-12-03 06:22:03 +0000 UTC]

D-A-M-N....that's quite amusing and very original you did an amazing job on this tut and you've made a great pattern aswell! Bravo indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to krazykohla [2006-12-03 06:27:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanx dude. Try it out and tell me what cha think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

krazykohla In reply to Dshark [2006-12-07 19:43:53 +0000 UTC]

I shall

and I'm a dude-ette btw

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to krazykohla [2006-12-07 22:28:52 +0000 UTC]

In that case I shall call you chica

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

krazykohla In reply to Dshark [2006-12-08 19:07:06 +0000 UTC]

Works for mwa

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to krazykohla [2006-12-08 20:50:50 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha. Ok, chica.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MrEdison In reply to ??? [2006-11-29 13:49:28 +0000 UTC]

Wow, really nice tut. I think I'm gonna give it a whirl.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to MrEdison [2006-11-29 21:02:34 +0000 UTC]

Cool! When ya get a chance be sure to show me your results.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MrEdison In reply to Dshark [2006-12-03 06:22:51 +0000 UTC]

Fo sho!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dshark In reply to MrEdison [2006-12-03 06:32:46 +0000 UTC]

Gracias!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Black6 In reply to ??? [2006-11-24 08:11:02 +0000 UTC]

nice tut

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>