HOME | DD

dwarfpriest — The Boobs Part 5

Published: 2005-08-18 11:10:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 5954; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 366
Redirect to original
Description A more finished work. Mode defined lines, more works in the details, even shading.
Definitively a lot better than [link] , [link] , [link] and [link] .





Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6
Related content
Comments: 35

bob500 [2005-08-20 05:51:56 +0000 UTC]

Dear sweet lord, thumbs way up!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to bob500 [2005-08-20 20:33:26 +0000 UTC]

Hehe. thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bob500 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 21:04:04 +0000 UTC]

In a way I think number 5 looks a bit better than the final version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to bob500 [2005-08-20 21:06:52 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... maybe. Some pics dosen't look as good in CG as the original version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bob500 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 21:09:44 +0000 UTC]

True, the shading is what I think shines through better in number fize than number 6.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

srflour [2005-08-19 10:29:50 +0000 UTC]

The boobs look bigger too. Is this a different girl......?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to srflour [2005-08-19 15:37:10 +0000 UTC]

It's the same one, just redone the lines.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

srflour In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 06:19:55 +0000 UTC]

I forgot to put the in my last comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vejita00 [2005-08-19 03:38:05 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Vejita00 [2005-08-20 20:33:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leen-Rouge [2005-08-19 01:58:50 +0000 UTC]

This is... just great! Must fave!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Leen-Rouge [2005-08-20 20:31:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Barkis1 [2005-08-19 01:27:17 +0000 UTC]

Any more of this series

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Barkis1 [2005-08-20 20:30:48 +0000 UTC]

The last part was colored, as you already saw

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Barkis1 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-21 01:55:38 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rezin86 [2005-08-18 22:17:23 +0000 UTC]

I think I have a better understanding at what this all means but I dont understand what flamer got you to do this in the first place, or is it just all of them in general? I dont know I'm still alittle lost

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Rezin86 [2005-08-20 20:30:10 +0000 UTC]

All of them in general. And many that are my friends, thats what annoyed me more.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KonekoRyu [2005-08-18 19:14:26 +0000 UTC]

kickass shading ^^ I think that, since there's so little going on with the boobs, you can really see how much was put into the rest of the pic ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to KonekoRyu [2005-08-20 20:29:27 +0000 UTC]

I just noticed it after you said. Yeah, her breats area is very clean, so the rest of the effects appear more.
Thanks ^^
Too bad I can't make more of the shadding appear. My scanner makes the drawing too light, and it dosen't have an option to make it darker without darkening the whole drawing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Iced-Equestria [2005-08-18 18:45:34 +0000 UTC]

wunderbar!^^ great job!^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Iced-Equestria [2005-08-20 20:28:09 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilentTakeshi [2005-08-18 17:51:43 +0000 UTC]

This whole series reminds me of performance art. Or that guy who told the newspapers he'd built a machine to replace juries in trials. I have no idea how to explain what I'm trying to say, but I applaud you for this. All of this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to SilentTakeshi [2005-08-20 20:28:02 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... dunno if I it could be called performance art. Performance art seens a lot more complex and sophisticated thing.
But thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SilentTakeshi In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-21 03:59:56 +0000 UTC]

"Performance art" is not nearly as pretentous or complicated as it sounds. You could blow spit wads in class and call it performance art, as long as you had a reason besides just wanting to do it. Which you definitely do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WestCadet08 [2005-08-18 16:10:16 +0000 UTC]

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to WestCadet08 [2005-08-20 20:26:28 +0000 UTC]

hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkflames05 [2005-08-18 15:40:33 +0000 UTC]

now theres the dwarf we know!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to darkflames05 [2005-08-20 20:24:43 +0000 UTC]

Yes, a Dwarf you guys know now. When I started, I didn't draw better tahn pic #2 or #3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkflames05 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-22 16:38:50 +0000 UTC]

realy? i don't remember anything like that, unless you deleted them from your site.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to darkflames05 [2005-08-22 16:49:36 +0000 UTC]

No, that was pre-DA time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darkflames05 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-23 01:57:27 +0000 UTC]

make sence i guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ifrit-7 [2005-08-18 15:09:36 +0000 UTC]

Great, Now I feel like an idiot for posting on #4.....

Nice job...bla bla bla....Flaming is wrong, ect.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to Ifrit-7 [2005-08-20 20:21:45 +0000 UTC]

Actualy you posted in #3. lol. Naw, don't feel like in idiot. I was posting these things that way on purpose

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

three-planes [2005-08-18 13:52:16 +0000 UTC]

See, now this is worth faving.

To the inflation haters: We have brains and eyes for quality too!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dwarfpriest In reply to three-planes [2005-08-20 20:21:14 +0000 UTC]

Yep ^^
I spent a good deal of time on this one, based on a crappy doodle. Shows how things can change.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0