HOME | DD

Published: 2005-08-18 11:10:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 5954; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 366
Redirect to original
Description
A more finished work. Mode defined lines, more works in the details, even shading.Definitively a lot better than [link] , [link] , [link] and [link] .
Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6
Related content
Comments: 35
bob500 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 21:04:04 +0000 UTC]
In a way I think number 5 looks a bit better than the final version.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to bob500 [2005-08-20 21:06:52 +0000 UTC]
Hmm... maybe. Some pics dosen't look as good in CG as the original version.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bob500 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 21:09:44 +0000 UTC]
True, the shading is what I think shines through better in number fize than number 6.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
srflour [2005-08-19 10:29:50 +0000 UTC]
The boobs look bigger too. Is this a different girl......?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to srflour [2005-08-19 15:37:10 +0000 UTC]
It's the same one, just redone the lines.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
srflour In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-20 06:19:55 +0000 UTC]
I forgot to put the in my last comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dwarfpriest In reply to Barkis1 [2005-08-20 20:30:48 +0000 UTC]
The last part was colored, as you already saw
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rezin86 [2005-08-18 22:17:23 +0000 UTC]
I think I have a better understanding at what this all means but I dont understand what flamer got you to do this in the first place, or is it just all of them in general? I dont know I'm still alittle lost
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to Rezin86 [2005-08-20 20:30:10 +0000 UTC]
All of them in general. And many that are my friends, thats what annoyed me more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KonekoRyu [2005-08-18 19:14:26 +0000 UTC]
kickass shading ^^ I think that, since there's so little going on with the boobs, you can really see how much was put into the rest of the pic ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to KonekoRyu [2005-08-20 20:29:27 +0000 UTC]
I just noticed it after you said. Yeah, her breats area is very clean, so the rest of the effects appear more.
Thanks ^^
Too bad I can't make more of the shadding appear. My scanner makes the drawing too light, and it dosen't have an option to make it darker without darkening the whole drawing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SilentTakeshi [2005-08-18 17:51:43 +0000 UTC]
This whole series reminds me of performance art. Or that guy who told the newspapers he'd built a machine to replace juries in trials. I have no idea how to explain what I'm trying to say, but I applaud you for this. All of this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to SilentTakeshi [2005-08-20 20:28:02 +0000 UTC]
Hmm... dunno if I it could be called performance art. Performance art seens a lot more complex and sophisticated thing.
But thanks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SilentTakeshi In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-21 03:59:56 +0000 UTC]
"Performance art" is not nearly as pretentous or complicated as it sounds. You could blow spit wads in class and call it performance art, as long as you had a reason besides just wanting to do it. Which you definitely do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dwarfpriest In reply to darkflames05 [2005-08-20 20:24:43 +0000 UTC]
Yes, a Dwarf you guys know now. When I started, I didn't draw better tahn pic #2 or #3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
darkflames05 In reply to dwarfpriest [2005-08-22 16:38:50 +0000 UTC]
realy? i don't remember anything like that, unless you deleted them from your site.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to darkflames05 [2005-08-22 16:49:36 +0000 UTC]
No, that was pre-DA time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ifrit-7 [2005-08-18 15:09:36 +0000 UTC]
Great, Now I feel like an idiot for posting on #4.....
Nice job...bla bla bla....Flaming is wrong, ect.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to Ifrit-7 [2005-08-20 20:21:45 +0000 UTC]
Actualy you posted in #3. lol. Naw, don't feel like in idiot. I was posting these things that way on purpose
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
three-planes [2005-08-18 13:52:16 +0000 UTC]
See, now this is worth faving.
To the inflation haters: We have brains and eyes for quality too!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwarfpriest In reply to three-planes [2005-08-20 20:21:14 +0000 UTC]
Yep ^^
I spent a good deal of time on this one, based on a crappy doodle. Shows how things can change.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0