HOME | DD

eRe4s3rComplex Spaceship View 2

Published: 2010-03-31 15:52:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 53469; Favourites: 739; Downloads: 15179
Redirect to original
Description My newest project Ah well.. currently it is not really textured but that might change sooner or later

View 2 first because View 1 (the main frontal view) is still rendering

2.7 Million polygons

Comments are welcome
Related content
Comments: 239

iyaayas66 [2010-06-20 07:07:54 +0000 UTC]

Neat Looking Ship! What ship class are you going for?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to iyaayas66 [2010-06-21 05:54:54 +0000 UTC]

I was going for big-ship class, Dreadnought!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ColonelYeo [2010-04-27 02:25:02 +0000 UTC]

That's very awesome! I love the design for the engines.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to ColonelYeo [2010-05-21 18:05:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ColonelYeo In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-05-25 06:57:43 +0000 UTC]

welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

axatius [2010-04-25 16:40:03 +0000 UTC]

Awesome work right there. What did you use to model this ship?
And for the painting, instead of using texture mapping, which would take days seeing the size of this, use a program like zbrush or mudbox to do polypainting, which is like painting a sculpture. This might save you a sh*t-ton of worktime.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to axatius [2010-05-21 18:05:34 +0000 UTC]

Hey there, sorry for the late reply

I used Cinema 4D

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GuaIich0 In reply to ??? [2010-04-23 21:06:35 +0000 UTC]

you left me without words with this one!
Congratulations! Awesome Work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marztaztic [2010-04-19 09:00:52 +0000 UTC]

badazz....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KayKove In reply to ??? [2010-04-08 00:34:49 +0000 UTC]

My processor hurts just looking at this. And for the size of the rest of the ship, this thing has some serious pushing power in the trunk. At least the 0-60 time will be good

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to KayKove [2010-04-08 15:04:38 +0000 UTC]

Haha, with spaceships its all about the engine size

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kamis0ri [2010-04-07 06:34:17 +0000 UTC]

thats alot of polys!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Kamis0ri [2010-04-07 11:12:59 +0000 UTC]

Thats true

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

John-Perish [2010-04-07 04:19:10 +0000 UTC]

i could tell you the million things that are wrong with this ship design, but instead i will just say its at least a talented render

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to John-Perish [2010-04-07 11:14:39 +0000 UTC]

I am not sure whether that is good or bad!

On the contrary, compared to my first DD (see my journal post ,p) this is a terrible rendering, and i am only too well aware of that. In fact - this isn't even the finished version of this ship, i am still tinkering with scene/light/texture for this one so the DD takes a lot of steam out of my sails for this...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlaiddDrwgMeddyg In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 04:04:07 +0000 UTC]

2.7 million ...?

The most complex thing I've made thus far barely scratches 10,000.

Seriously, seriously nice work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to BlaiddDrwgMeddyg [2010-04-07 11:14:54 +0000 UTC]

Well many polygons does not equal quality, just equals laziness.. on my part

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sarah--AS In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 03:21:51 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous! '0'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Sarah--AS [2010-04-07 03:44:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Superiorgamer In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 03:20:38 +0000 UTC]

Very pretty engine effect!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Superiorgamer [2010-04-07 03:46:35 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vanguard3000 In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 02:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Whoa, nice! How did you do the engine glow?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Vanguard3000 [2010-04-07 03:18:26 +0000 UTC]

Well with my patented (joke) engine glow photoshop method.. basically 50% in photoshop and 50% in 3d

Will probably do a tutorial about it sooner or later, atm i am busy though ,p

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vanguard3000 In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-07 04:23:42 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough. If/when you do the tutorial, I look forward to seeing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Branflakes2 [2010-04-07 02:27:07 +0000 UTC]

stunning.

kind of looks like the pillar of autumn from halo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Branflakes2 [2010-04-07 11:15:08 +0000 UTC]

Only kind of (Thanks )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Branflakes2 In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-08 02:31:35 +0000 UTC]

indeed sir

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

beza [2010-04-07 02:21:40 +0000 UTC]

looks plastic. like a very impressive lego project.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to beza [2010-04-07 11:15:24 +0000 UTC]

It would be more impressive if it were actual lego

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

beza In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-08 00:03:32 +0000 UTC]

perhaps, but even as a 3d image, its still pretty impressive. Thats a lot of polygons to keep track of. Looks like texture mapping it is going to be a nightmare

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sylviaD In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 02:08:57 +0000 UTC]

Looks a bit like a souped-up Corellian Corvette!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to sylviaD [2010-04-07 11:16:21 +0000 UTC]

Ehm.. 2nd person that says this... i disagree, starwars style is not industrial style but this is clearly industrial style ^^

Ah well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

sylviaD In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-07 20:12:04 +0000 UTC]

lol sorry!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yinsho [2010-04-07 02:03:42 +0000 UTC]

2.7 Million polygons!??!
WTF MAN!? O_o
How can your computer even handle that?!

BTW, you might want to go inside the object and delete walls and boxes and pieces that aren't visible from the outside.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Yinsho [2010-04-07 03:19:44 +0000 UTC]

Haha Well i modeled it in 3 stages, engines, middle section, front and weapons. Only for rendering i merged them all together. But overall my pc can handle 3 million polygons with ease and the rendertime was still well within operational limits (below 2 hours)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Yinsho In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-07 03:32:28 +0000 UTC]

Oh, alright. .3. Cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MRHANKY2000 In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 01:31:07 +0000 UTC]

wow man! this looks like something the terran from starcraft 2 would have, good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to MRHANKY2000 [2010-04-07 03:51:07 +0000 UTC]

yes but they'd ruin it by painting it silver and blue

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MRHANKY2000 In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-07 03:57:05 +0000 UTC]

thats not ruining it. its making it look more prettyful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Draztak [2010-04-07 01:07:28 +0000 UTC]

Astounding detail.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Draztak [2010-04-07 11:16:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

abomablenoman In reply to ??? [2010-04-07 01:07:25 +0000 UTC]

thats a lotta polygons

nice work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to abomablenoman [2010-04-07 11:16:47 +0000 UTC]

Yep, wasteful waste of resources, but meh

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bigfunkychiken [2010-04-07 01:05:49 +0000 UTC]

congrats!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to bigfunkychiken [2010-04-07 11:16:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Phoenix667 [2010-04-07 00:39:54 +0000 UTC]

this is more than awesome! it's...er...dunno, but it's great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Phoenix667 [2010-04-07 11:17:05 +0000 UTC]

So its awesomesaucegreatness ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phoenix667 In reply to eRe4s3r [2010-04-07 14:14:05 +0000 UTC]

errrr...yeah...something like that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Red62 [2010-04-07 00:25:57 +0000 UTC]

I CALL SHOTGUN!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

eRe4s3r In reply to Red62 [2010-04-07 11:17:14 +0000 UTC]

I prefer rocker launchers!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>