HOME | DD

Flamekin2 — Cybernetic Conversion part 15

Published: 2011-09-03 01:57:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 37477; Favourites: 181; Downloads: 327
Redirect to original
Description Part 15/26
Related content
Comments: 9

laughingvulcan [2011-09-11 14:35:50 +0000 UTC]

Flamekin,

Had a thought about this this morning...not sure if you will find it helpful:

Depending on how much expression the 3DCG heads can show, to make this segment (And the girl's reconfiguration) more dramatic, you COULD add an inset panel or two.

These panels could focus on his panicked view as the nanites consume his clothing and change his body to HER new form...
One or two panels could be focused on HER face as the process finishes there. (Maybe before her optics go dark and she passes out?)

This scene (and the earlier 'girl's' scene) has impact, but it could be stronger.
It's kinda like how a Hollywood director would film a werewolf TF...The director would move the camera in close and show the body parts changing...cutting back to the person's face occasionally, showing how they feel...and then cutting to another body part transforming.

That would help us empathize MORE and connect with him...err...HER.

Be well.

Greg

That would help you connect more with, umm...'boy' here, methinks.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Arandombeing In reply to laughingvulcan [2014-09-20 19:02:16 +0000 UTC]

Cybernetic vs Borg!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

laughingvulcan In reply to Arandombeing [2014-09-20 22:10:21 +0000 UTC]

THEY'RE cuter...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arandombeing In reply to laughingvulcan [2014-09-21 03:03:26 +0000 UTC]

I MEAN GUNS AND LAZORZ (yes they are cuter  )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

laughingvulcan In reply to Arandombeing [2014-09-21 04:41:52 +0000 UTC]

Depends on if the Girls have personal shields...otherwise the Borg would have the edge, I'd think...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arandombeing In reply to laughingvulcan [2014-09-21 14:33:51 +0000 UTC]

So resistance isn't futile?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alexwarlorn [2011-09-03 02:18:15 +0000 UTC]

'Not this way.' Huh? Irony. Becomes a girl bot.

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

Arandombeing In reply to alexwarlorn [2014-09-21 14:34:06 +0000 UTC]

Irony.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dimensionwalker21 In reply to alexwarlorn [2013-07-14 04:36:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0