HOME | DD

Fukari — how to censor your artwork

#censor #filter #mature #nudity #shitstorm #freenipples #censored
Published: 2017-02-23 19:07:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 334693; Favourites: 2154; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

we are learn from mistakes. there's a quite big discuss under the original artwork (here > greenhouse girl  ) about lack of Mature Filter. I'm higly concerned about poor kids that migh be violated by the view of female body with only nipples covered and no sign of vagina (or shoud I say 'bajingo' or 'va-jay-jay'?). someone even reported it, but uh, those lazy admins didn't found it filthy enough to force me to put Mature Filter on it. shame on you admins!

so I learned my lesson and I made 3 censor types that I'll be using from now so everyone will be pleased. can't decide which one I like the most, if you could vote for your favourite one then it will be helpful    let's make deviantart a better place!   

_ _ _

now for real. some of you noticed that I started to make these funny heart censors for private parts (GENITALIAS!!! :U ) at my drawings. or sometimes I don't. why? why can't I just put mature filter at every picture that contains a nipple? because I don't find it wrong. that's why. I believe that female nipples are as appropriate as male nipples. I believe that human body is beautiful and natural and we shoudn't be shocked by view of breast or butt, we shouldn't tread it as something wrong. It's what we are. So if the character at my picture is not shown in sexual pose then I'm just placing heart stickers on private parts. Seems legit for me. But if the picture has a nudity and sexual themes then I'm putting mature filter on. Deviantart is allowed for userd 13 y/o and above so we are not talking about toddlers exposed for the view of nude people. well, even not real people only drawn ones! 13 y/o kids seen worse things, even here at dA, than naked girl with covered nipples and no vagina. it's not vulgar. it's just the body.also if dA staff members rejected the report then it means that I didn't violated service policy. To leave no doubt - I do respect service policy which says that if I want to post drawings that contain nude characters then genitalias have to be covered.     here's your  appropriate banana    

summarizing:
nudity + no sexual theme =     heart sticker on genitalias
nudity + sexual theme =  Mature Filter on


my english is not fluent enough to start a discussion about using nudity in our society and positive/negative aspects of that. feel free to discuss, but I'll not join you, I made my statement about using censor in my art above. And be like Bill


_ _ _
appropriate male chest and nipples Male stock KC 3  , good nips man!
Related content
Comments: 319

rubyrebecca123 In reply to ??? [2017-02-25 02:58:31 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm not sure since da is kinda fucky already.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BigSisterSplash In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:36:58 +0000 UTC]

I  always thought your nude/nsfw art was very tasteful, and pretty,

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

speedysketch In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:31:23 +0000 UTC]


im sorry but male nipples just got me laughin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nevermore979 In reply to speedysketch [2017-02-24 00:18:24 +0000 UTC]

Ya same! It makes no sense though how society just deems certain body parts on girls not appropriate when guys have the same stuff but have different rules, yknow?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Katakire In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:22:36 +0000 UTC]

OHMYLORD i vote for the appropriate male nipples!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

antipluesch In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:18:04 +0000 UTC]

i love you soooo much right now. i just stumpled out of a trump-discussion and it's soooo good to see, there are still intelligent people out there, everything might end up fine. on the subject: i'm just sad we now don't see female-parts anymore in your art. i'm alsways irritated by censoring of "nude"art, because i don't get what people do, when their children want to go to a museum. as a student of archeology, there are nude people all around me in media everytime, constandly, everywhere. i think it all comes from the purists migrating to the US and the US still dominating the internet... in european history, even in the middleages, when we were really strict about sexual things, every damn church was FULL with pictures of nude people. and there wasn't ANY censory.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FacelessBuster In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:10:06 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you one hundred percent Fukari. You keep doing your thing and making awesome artwork.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gothic-chocobo In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:03:36 +0000 UTC]

You better hide those seductive eyes as well just for safe measures.

Also make sure not to take children to art galleries, they should only let you in if you are over 18!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tranki-zieleniack In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 22:02:19 +0000 UTC]

I'm suprised anyone thought that the picture should have a "mature filter". there's nothing vulgar, improper or as you can call it to put a mature filter on it - in my opinion. If I were you, I wouldn't put a mature filter on it, because I wouldn't even consider it, as there's no sex scene, no genitals, no violence, nothing like that. Sometimes I go through "newest deviantions" and there is a lot of VERY vulgar stuff,, I'm curious sometimes, why people draw or photograph such things. In my opinion nudity in your picture is very sublte and feminine... and just beautiful

BTW, I've just realised, that I have a picture in my gallery, very old one, in which there's a girl combing her hair. She's naked, she has only a towel on her hips. I drew it probably when I was under 18. should I give a mature filter on it beause her breasts are naked? give a mature filter on picture I drew, when I was under 18? I never thought like that, because that was everyday thing for me, nothing special, nothing vulgar etc.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Unoraptormon [2017-02-23 21:50:57 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Titaniic [2017-02-23 21:45:11 +0000 UTC]

I'm definitely with you on this one. This piece had absolutely no sexual content at all and there weren't even any exposed genitals or actual nipples. Also, I'd vote for number 3 of course, those are gorgeous man nips

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TotemEye In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:43:00 +0000 UTC]

Niedlugo DeviantArt bedzie chcial zafitrowac cala postac. 
Cenzura na tylek, cenzura na piersi, cenzura na stopy. No ale niestety zapomnialas ze w krajach dalekiego wschodu, najbardziej seksualne sa oczy, rece i wlosy (to fakt) tak wiec przydalyby sie czarne okulary i rekawiczki. Wypadaloby rowniez owinac czyms wlosy. Najlepiej narysowac tylko kontury i wypelnic jednolitym kolorem. Wtedy nikogo sie nie obrazi XDDD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Okamikage666 In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:41:57 +0000 UTC]

WHY WOULD THEY REPORT IT? 0^0 Bishes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CharlieForte [2017-02-23 21:39:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh damn, I'd definitely vote for number 3 just for the statement in itself xD
Personally I prefer to be practical and go with the filter just to avoid trouble, but I definitely agree with you. Either way, loved the piece just as I love all your art. You keep doing you <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

schlach-uffn-kopp [2017-02-23 21:32:31 +0000 UTC]

You forgot to cover her shamelessly flowing hair. How dare you!

I'm totally with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cranberry--zombie [2017-02-23 21:31:16 +0000 UTC]

God forbid we have to censor the art that comes from our own ha DS because some person who finds the beauty of the natural human body offensive for one reason or another. Have mercy if they ever attend a life-drawing class..
Your art is beautiful and wonderful. And I think that you portray the beauty of the human body wonderfully, censored or otherwise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SGPotter [2017-02-23 21:29:41 +0000 UTC]

That third one makes me freaked out wtf

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chaluny In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:25:46 +0000 UTC]

Hahahahahaha,
I always asked myself why women have to censor their nipples (even if the breasts are visible Example ) while men doesn't have to censor them xD
So the men-nipples-censoring is perfectly! Disturbing but it has a message, haha.

It's kinda sad that nudity (without sexual context) is taboo.. Ohmagawd, nipples everywhere! Call the police..
I always enjoy to look at your art. Luv how you work with bodies, proportions and expressions of your characters.
No matter if there's censoring or not

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

S-ibbi In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:10:41 +0000 UTC]

Bless you and your art!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dozakeet In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:08:36 +0000 UTC]

Hmm. I have a pretty set opinion on censoring tbh. 

The way I see it, if a little kid is scrolling through dA and comes across a nude drawing, their parents could see it and get mad, either at the website or their kid.. If it's anything that would, say, trigger a parent looking over their kid's shoulder while they're on dA, then I'd censor it.

Though personally if I ever have children, I'd hate for them to think of anything including nudity to equal sexual content. That's a terrible, though way too common look on things.

As someone who is 100% comfortable with seeing nude art, ofcourse I don't really mind that much. 
This is hilarious though xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

namiisgoneoffdA [2017-02-23 21:05:13 +0000 UTC]

Why do people like to make everything dirty? It's their fault they can't contain their filth! You do you, fuka!! >:U

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

silken-angel [2017-02-23 21:04:01 +0000 UTC]

SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lauramansfield [2017-02-23 21:01:26 +0000 UTC]

Holy cow this made my day

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chemik91 In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 21:01:14 +0000 UTC]

MĘSKIE SUTY <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

THEATOMBOMB035 In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:48:12 +0000 UTC]

*clapping* well done. I laughed way harder then I should have at this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

carbonacat In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:42:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah it's a shame we're rejecting what the nature gave us as "mature".

I usually don't censor my nudity and add the Mature filter.

You can't do whatever you want on someone else's house; you got to respect the rules. And DA is definitely not anyone's house.
At best you can try to discuss the rules.


Your heart stickers censor are cute <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SPARROUU In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:40:58 +0000 UTC]

I saw the fuss on the original deviation for this and had a little laugh, nudity with subtle censorship/coverage is such a common subject matter in art whether it be online or in museums and doesnt really need a 'mature filter'
and then even then --most of the front page of dA after a certain point is legitimately fetish porn, much without mature filters, yet the scuffle over the difference between artistic nudity and sexual nakedness with mature filters happened on this piece x"D guys, no

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Empress-of-Dark In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:39:34 +0000 UTC]

More problems with deviantART! Yay! Our favorite website to complain about (except for YouTube, of course). I just feel that people have gotten so sensitive over the stupidest shit lately. Personally, censorship is something that I don't really believe in. The most demented and worst parts of human nature is STILL a part of human nature. We may choose not to view it, but it is still a part of human nature whether people want to admit it or not. I know someone who got reported by some sheep about her picture showing two people in a shower with steam covering the private parts. But this is where the problem lies:

A tit is just a tit. A dick is just a dick. It's all still a part of the human body. We have the most bloody, brutal, and overly sexualized perversions of nearly any society (except for Japan, omfg). Instead of someone choosing simply not to look at it, they want to stir trouble by reporting it because they don't agree with it, or they don't like it, or they don't want to see it. I've heard the argument that 'Oh, but kids can browse this site!' Yeah, well, they can also look up animal torture sites or pornography. Kids- just because they're 13 - doesn't mean that they won't go to explicit websites; they are going to whether it's out of boredom or curiosity. So I feel these rules to keep deviantART "family friendly" is futile. But even if they wanted to, the website still has a maturity filter so younger kids can't see what's behind the shield. Then again, people can now simply type in a fake birth date without even logging in so they can see behind said shield.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chisai-Yokai In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:38:30 +0000 UTC]

I had the same problem when I posted this painting.

Mature Content


I didn't think it was inappropriate. I don't think artistic nudity needs to be censored.
I hadn't realized dA has required all forms of nudity to be censored, I thought as long as it wasn't erotic I didn't need a censor.
Of course I got someone being very rude in my comments acting like I was a moron for not adding a mature filter.
I think dA should revise their rules on censoring artistic nudity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Kaiidumb In reply to Chisai-Yokai [2017-02-24 00:16:08 +0000 UTC]

HONESTLY I think the pic was fine like it was in a tasteful manner and didn't have any sexual themes in it and cough the person saying your a moron for not censoring it is a hypocrite because there were some sexual themes in their gallery which were  uncensored cough but yeah they could have at least been more polite about the situation. 

And I agree wholeheartedly because uncensored breasts aren't even that bad as long as it's in an artistic manor!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chisai-Yokai In reply to Kaiidumb [2017-02-24 00:22:37 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!
Yeah I had checked out their gallery and saw the kind of stuff they posted and just kind of rolled my eyes at it.
I figured bringing it up would be petty but damn, they need to get off their high horse.
I also don't understand why they couldn't be polite about it, it's not hard, and their account claims them to be an adult so they should probably act like one.

Yeah like I agree erotic stuff should be censored 100% but tasteful and artful nudity/exposure of the female breasts? Why is that so bad?
When I was a kid I looked at tons of classical art and anatomy books that had tons of exposed breasts. It didn't hurt me to see them and it's not going to hurt kids who already have easy access to porn websites.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xXStarry-SkyesXx [2017-02-23 20:36:52 +0000 UTC]

I think your usual heart stickers are fine I know sakimi uses like streaks of blurred light to censor her stuff

I mean her legs were already censoring her vagina XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RoseElegance [2017-02-23 20:31:35 +0000 UTC]

I found nothing wrong with it. the only thing I would have done differently is used leaves instead of hearts. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lisande-Puredream [2017-02-23 20:28:13 +0000 UTC]

i think you should use the last version from now on

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gdpr-36514250 [2017-02-23 20:10:29 +0000 UTC]

I have to say the third version of censoring is perfect


I'm really disappointed  in how sensitive the community has gotten. A lot of the people that are harping on how an under boob can explode a child's brain seems to forget that when they were 13 and they saw a nip they either shrugged it off or had a little bit of a chuckle.

Not to mention that some 13 year olds just wait for their parents to leave their rooms so they can start up pornhub.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IndigoWarrior1 In reply to gdpr-36514250 [2017-02-23 20:53:46 +0000 UTC]

A lot of people on-site seem to underestimate children. At the age of 8, I could already subtract 5 from my birthyear and could've joined the site that way. Crazy, I know.

Anyway, explaining love, sex and the human body is the parent's responsibility, cause it's all part of life that they will eventually encounter. I'm thinking a lot of these people demanding a mature filter were really sheltered.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-36514250 In reply to IndigoWarrior1 [2017-02-23 21:35:42 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and this is the sad part, parents don't want to explain those things to their children. They just want to cover it up because they don't want to deal with 10 min of awkwardness and in the mean time shaping a future society that is so sheltered that living in the real world becomes impossible for them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pirate-Yashimaru In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:09:47 +0000 UTC]

go number 3 lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Medral In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:07:23 +0000 UTC]

lol seriously they reported the original? this is crazy!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Penstray In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:03:10 +0000 UTC]

  I really couldn't agree more, I find it hysterically ironic how people complain about works of art on deviantArt & Co affecting young, innocent minds, when kids these days have sex (OMG, GASP, I used the forbidden word, shame on me for eternity) and watch porn since they're barely 10 or younger. Not saying it's something bad or good, not judging, I'm saying it just happens so,  in this case, what's the point to censor things people already know about? Also censoring doesn't help with anything, I think it's great for people to have access to information of any kind, especially one that's so natural. If people want to make kids and youngsters more responsible towards nudity, sex & the likes then I think the answer is for parents, teachers & Co to explain these stuff properly and do some serious sex education, not sweep them under the rug of ignorance, because that's way worse and can lead to frustrations & Co.

So what I want to say is that the human body is awesome, and I for one love the fact that I watch artists, like you, who know this and show their appreciation for it in their works. So thank you for sharing your art with us

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

beekinx In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 20:00:18 +0000 UTC]

nudity is not inherently sexual, people need to learn that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hannzopie In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 19:57:39 +0000 UTC]

I really agree with you! Some people make genitals a much bigger issue than they are... I mean everybody has them, what's so weird about it?
as long as they're not shown in a sexual way you really shouldn't need to censor it! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mielinna In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 19:57:02 +0000 UTC]

HAHAHAA!
Laughed so much.
Nudity is so overrated. But it's because society makes us believe that nudity = sexuality. 

Free the nipples! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

katagro In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 19:56:29 +0000 UTC]

ahhahah you won! totally made my day!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JuKii In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 19:56:11 +0000 UTC]

Nawet by mi do głowy nie przyszło, że ludzie tam zrobili taką dramę XD bardzo dobra odpowiedź! lubię taką postawę!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mizie-Wolf [2017-02-23 19:54:08 +0000 UTC]

Couldn't agree with you more!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GlasshouseMurderer [2017-02-23 19:48:06 +0000 UTC]

I want to like your statement. But this isn't facebook. So just imagine me giving you a thumbs up for that one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Venterry [2017-02-23 19:47:53 +0000 UTC]

the nipples got me


but for real, i think the whole problem with the mature filter should be handled better, it's difficult because you never know what to expect (if the title isn't clear enough), perhaps a different, clearer approach would be a bit more helpful (maybe something that shows wether it's covered because of somehting like blood/gore or sexual themes?)

i think artistic nudity on the other hand is wonderful and don't get where the problem lies in openly displaying it, i mean just look at greek art

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LauraRamirez [2017-02-23 19:47:41 +0000 UTC]

I agree with the nipples, nothing "shocking" about them xDD
Speaking of nipples, what shocks me is when a woman is breast feeding her baby, and people are either shocked or perverts go "BEEEEWWWBS!" I mean come one! She feeding a baby! Dafuq 0__O

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chillyskies In reply to ??? [2017-02-23 19:44:53 +0000 UTC]

Amen that this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>