HOME | DD

Published: 2009-11-18 11:55:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 12337; Favourites: 260; Downloads: 2720
Redirect to original
Description
Evolution versus the Creation of Man. Done in watercolor on watercolor paper.Related content
Comments: 94
tonypk In reply to geekblz [2013-08-15 15:15:09 +0000 UTC]
I added your art piece in my favourites gallery - it is a hypothetical gallery which will eventually become an art book - perhaps you might like to be involved in this art book for real?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
belsart [2012-06-27 14:06:47 +0000 UTC]
think the evolution doesnt had any problem. Man all time is worry about everything, complicating things, cant live just in peace
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
belsart [2012-06-27 14:06:18 +0000 UTC]
think the evolution doesnt had any problem. Man all time is worry about everything, complicating things, can live just in peace
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Hachugeo [2012-02-28 13:12:09 +0000 UTC]
very great draw ! maybe the truth is in the middle ^^" saw the grid for the proportion of part creation
what's the best part because it can include some changes in it
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
ColorPixie [2011-11-10 07:33:10 +0000 UTC]
Is it okay for me to use this as a front page image on a school report?
Pretty please?
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
kmathel94 [2011-08-31 16:19:39 +0000 UTC]
I believe in both evolution and religon so this is an epic pic in my mind!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
RawrReaper [2011-07-05 10:38:46 +0000 UTC]
i honestly believe in evolution. i'm not particually religious
but i LOVE how the evo background is a 'park bench' and the creationism is blueprints for maping out spiritual stuff
๐: 0 โฉ: 2
shadoe-gary-paul In reply to RawrReaper [2015-01-04 16:27:01 +0000 UTC]
FYI the evolution side isn't a "park bench" it is sediment layers.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
RawrReaper In reply to shadoe-gary-paul [2015-01-05 06:24:20 +0000 UTC]
haha thanks for clarifying.ย
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
shadoe-gary-paul In reply to RawrReaper [2015-01-05 18:23:30 +0000 UTC]
It's all good, have a pleasant day.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Nath-Carr In reply to RawrReaper [2011-08-05 18:53:17 +0000 UTC]
being religious does NOT implies not believing in evolution, I have a religion and I believe in evolution...just for you too know
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
RawrReaper In reply to Nath-Carr [2011-08-06 07:57:58 +0000 UTC]
of course i have met poeple like you too. i was just telling my story
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
WingDiamond [2010-08-04 04:09:44 +0000 UTC]
The Piraha people of Brazil don't give a rat's ass one way or the other.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Niroku6288 [2010-02-09 01:43:40 +0000 UTC]
Shouldn't it say "Unlimited number of descendants?" considering where it points?
Why say disciples?
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
geekblz In reply to Niroku6288 [2010-02-11 06:13:36 +0000 UTC]
Sorry. I'm not that religious, and I'm also quite sarcastic sometimes. Saying "Unlimited supply of disciples" is kind of a sarcastic way to view God creating man, and imagining that everyone that descends from this one person will be a disciple to him...like he is creating this one person in hopes of one day having many who all worship him. Not sure you'll like my answer, but it's what I was thinking when I made it. Don't think anyone's noticed it until now though.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Niroku6288 In reply to geekblz [2010-02-11 11:08:32 +0000 UTC]
Makes sense. I just thought you had mixed the two words up.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
geekblz In reply to Niroku6288 [2010-02-13 20:38:42 +0000 UTC]
Heh. Nah. I actually love writing, so words are important to me, and I choose them carefully.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Manzhanz [2009-12-01 22:50:19 +0000 UTC]
Cool dev with an interesting concept. Personally ima Intelligent design person ( evolution isnt ;accident' but moved by God) and this give an interesting illustration to the theories and beliefs.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
geekblz In reply to Manzhanz [2009-12-01 23:07:54 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, tried to keep it neutral.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Artsetter [2009-11-19 11:49:20 +0000 UTC]
Awesome work! Have you checked out Artsetter.com? I think it would be great for you to create an online gallery there!
Cheers!
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
geekblz In reply to shmisten [2009-11-19 09:57:30 +0000 UTC]
Thanks I'm sort of surprised how much attention it's gotten!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
geekblz In reply to shmisten [2009-11-19 10:01:21 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I'm a whore, but not necessarily for attention.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
shortlilninja [2009-11-19 08:42:51 +0000 UTC]
very cool
"why doesn't everyone just drop the whole topic who cares what made us or if we evolved" that is what my grandmother told me once i kind of think she is right it starts to much hate with the topic
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
VentAnger [2009-11-19 01:22:18 +0000 UTC]
I like the image, but I don't think it necessarily should be called "Evolution vs. Creation", I don't think there has to be a battle between the two. What I took from your image is a notion that the two can work together.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
geekblz In reply to VentAnger [2009-11-19 09:50:45 +0000 UTC]
I agree with "shortlilninja"...but everyone is missing the point that this was for class and we were creating an illustration for a magazine article that was about Evolution vs. Creation. This was my way to present the two ideas in a way that wasn't trying to put either on a pedestal, but rather presented them as equals because the article would really have been the focus in reality. Not that I don't respect everyone's opinions, but you have to remember there was a reason for the way I did it. Thanks for checking out my work anyways. I appreciate it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>