HOME | DD

Harm-Less β€” Candysite

Published: 2009-09-24 01:04:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 4557; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description And old project, done for a contest for 99designs. I didn't win, although it was by far the best design, I guess the client thought otherwise

The concept was to sell candy online. And you are able to read reviews and watch videos about candy.

I'm not really pleased with it, but I thought I'd share.
Related content
Comments: 27

silent-Princee [2010-11-22 18:46:54 +0000 UTC]

Nice

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

silent-Princee [2010-04-06 15:30:27 +0000 UTC]

Nice Work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

yuriofpoland [2009-11-10 00:10:38 +0000 UTC]

very distracting... good colors, but you should work on most/less important eye catching elements.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

eduardo-garcia [2009-10-13 19:22:12 +0000 UTC]

Great Work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

tehacesequence [2009-10-04 17:20:40 +0000 UTC]

99 sux hard from time to time ;]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NG25Lab [2009-09-27 03:49:05 +0000 UTC]

very beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

the-danzor [2009-09-24 11:52:52 +0000 UTC]

very nice and clean design, good job

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EnzuDes1gn [2009-09-24 11:30:59 +0000 UTC]

love the use of stocks in this, good clear content too, well done man, and yea lol 99designs is such a waste of time they never seem to choose the rightful winner

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to EnzuDes1gn [2009-09-24 16:44:09 +0000 UTC]

So true
Never in my life I'll try 99designs again

Thanks for the comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Moev [2009-09-24 09:04:25 +0000 UTC]

yea. Great design
I love candy ;D

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to Moev [2009-09-24 16:42:38 +0000 UTC]

Who doesn't
Thanks mate

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Moev In reply to Harm-Less [2009-09-24 20:03:15 +0000 UTC]

np

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Svendsen [2009-09-24 06:55:49 +0000 UTC]

The main design doesnΒ΄t give me a feeling of "candy". ItΒ΄s too straight forward for that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to Svendsen [2009-09-24 07:05:57 +0000 UTC]

The main design?
Feeling?
I'm not sure I'm following.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

sensign In reply to Harm-Less [2009-09-24 07:27:26 +0000 UTC]

I think he means, without the images and the header it could be a business layout and I agree with that.. Altough it's a nice design

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Svendsen In reply to Harm-Less [2009-09-24 07:27:25 +0000 UTC]

The design of the site, it doesnΒ΄t tell me anyhing about "candy". So iΒ΄m missing a bit more joyful layout, and not as straight forward that it is now. Right now it can be a layout for everything.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to Svendsen [2009-09-24 08:37:23 +0000 UTC]

Can't agree more, but that was what the client demanded...

But thanks for the comments.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Svendsen In reply to Harm-Less [2009-09-24 21:35:50 +0000 UTC]

np

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PaulNLD [2009-09-24 06:44:49 +0000 UTC]

Ego is the best self knowledge there is lol! Great layout for sure. Keep up the good work mate!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Harm-Less In reply to PaulNLD [2009-09-24 06:53:15 +0000 UTC]

Lol, trust me, the other designs where below average But maybe you're right

Anyway, thanks for the comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PaulNLD In reply to PaulNLD [2009-09-24 06:45:10 +0000 UTC]

ooh yeah..


CANDYYYYY

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Arctic-Affinity [2009-09-24 03:39:31 +0000 UTC]

i haven't met anyone who's actually won from 99designs... :T

so i gave up on trying to make money there

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Harm-Less In reply to Arctic-Affinity [2009-09-24 04:32:56 +0000 UTC]

That was the second time I tried, but the first time I entered a contest I won. I won a 1000 bucks
I'm not going to try it again

Thanks for the comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Arctic-Affinity In reply to Harm-Less [2009-09-24 20:57:42 +0000 UTC]

wow, nice i entered ~5 times and lost them all to what were (imo) crappy designs (some contest creators have no sense of color theory or aesthetics...)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Arctic-Affinity In reply to Arctic-Affinity [2009-09-24 03:39:41 +0000 UTC]

great design though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alighandour [2009-09-24 01:27:33 +0000 UTC]

nice work the peppermints really make a statement

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Harm-Less In reply to alighandour [2009-09-24 02:26:23 +0000 UTC]

That's indeed the point
Thanks for the kind words

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0