HOME | DD

hulkdaddyg In reply to Lurker-Below [2010-02-19 05:00:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to J-Mace [2010-02-04 06:12:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, James!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to Chadfuller [2010-02-04 02:21:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Chad!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chadfuller In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-05 01:18:47 +0000 UTC]

your welcome sir!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to whiteknight222 [2010-02-04 02:20:57 +0000 UTC]

Ha! I'm not sure about that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

whiteknight222 In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-04 05:36:32 +0000 UTC]

lol ok maybe not. Still looks tough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hulkdaddyg In reply to whiteknight222 [2010-02-04 06:03:06 +0000 UTC]

Nothing wrong with a strong woman!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

whiteknight222 In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-04 06:07:25 +0000 UTC]

no sir.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to RODCOM1000 [2010-02-04 02:20:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Rod. What do you think of this style with the heavy blacks? I am thinking it's starting to look more professional.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

RODCOM1000 In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-04 12:36:18 +0000 UTC]

"look good in certain areas"
Sorry Gary, I should stop trying to do this at work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hulkdaddyg In reply to RODCOM1000 [2010-02-04 12:39:56 +0000 UTC]

adding that word changes the entire meaning of what you wrote! LOL OK! Still helpful, though. Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RODCOM1000 In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-04 08:51:10 +0000 UTC]

I think the heavy black inks look in certain areas like reflective surfaces or textures (in this case Fisty's suit) or when shooting for extreme contrast.
It tends to give things a hard, stark look so I wouldnt use it everywhere.
Fisty's a tough lady, but there's velvet covering that hammer

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hulkdaddyg In reply to RODCOM1000 [2010-02-04 12:25:24 +0000 UTC]

Great and helpful insight. Thanks, Rod.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to RedWingsDragon [2010-02-04 02:17:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, man.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to EricLinquist [2010-02-04 02:16:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Eric. You sound as if you didn't do a tribute of your own. LOL I did lose her cute factor though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EricLinquist In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-04 04:16:55 +0000 UTC]

I know Jeb is loving it! Nice job man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hulkdaddyg In reply to Jebriodo [2010-02-04 02:14:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Jed, I'm really glad you like it. Any tips for improvement? I made some changes from the pencils to make it a bit better, but I lost her cute factor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Jebriodo In reply to hulkdaddyg [2010-02-05 17:18:36 +0000 UTC]

Hmm- it looks like her expression changed from pencil to ink- she had a sort of impish look in pencil, more serious in ink. Also the outline of her face is sort of bumpy and large jawed which may account for some loss of cute.

Other things that pop out to me are proportion issues- her legs look really good and solidly drawn, but they are short compared to her torso. Her chest, arms and head are all a bit large for her legs, and her abdomen from sternum to hip is very short (I do this too a lot) making for a very abrupt transition to her big hips. If you draw a little more waist you can make a longer, smoother transition from ribs to hips and a more attractive line to the torso.

Regarding inking, the hatching is a bit harsh once you apply color- have you considered doing a color hold on the shading on skin and hair, making it a color instead of black?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

hulkdaddyg In reply to Jebriodo [2010-02-06 00:39:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Jed. I think you told me that about the torso before too. I have much to keep in mind. I really appreciate you taking the time to crit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0