HOME | DD
IAmTheUnison — There Is No Shame In Defending Yourself
Published: 2013-12-15 01:55:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 9509; Favourites: 201; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I feel a deep swell of pity for anybody so foolish as to disarm themselves before their enemies...and reality check, people! YOU ALWAYS HAVE ENEMIES!! Even if you don't know them yet. Such is the nature of the world we live in. There will always be those who seek to do you harm for whatever reasons they may have, and it is your responsibility and your responsibility alone to defend you and yours. Do not make the foolish error in judgement of thinking that someone else will defend you; for it is a very stupid person who blindly puts their safety in the hands of others; especially those who are pawns of a flawed and corrupt system such as what exists in this thing we call government.The police are not your first line of defense. The military is not your first line of defense. YOU are your first line of defense. YOU are responsible for you, and the sooner all you weak-minded, weak-spirited spineless worms wake up and realize this the better off we'll all be...namely 'cause the rest of us will no longer have to endure your childish whining.
To be prepared for war is the most effective way to maintain peace. Gun Control DOES NOT keep law-abiding citizens safe. It DOES NOT keep guns out of the hands of criminals. It just makes gullible suckers more easy targets for those who don't give a damn about the laws, and the corrupt swine who abuse the laws for their own selfish ends. Keep your guns! Because nothing wards off criminals and tyrants like a bullet to the head.
And if you are one of those brainless sheeple too feeble-minded understand the importance of this infallible truth, then you had best prepare yourself to succumb to the effects of Darwinism.
Related content
Comments: 374
sorry...they dont use blank rounds to shoot targets..how can they mark the score if no projectile hit the target
Sorry but I don't understand what you said here. Can you please word it differently again in a reply?
pardon my bad english....what i meant was that participants in the olympic shooting games have never shot at any humans or animals ever....and that they are not excelling their skills in target practice for the purpose to hunt humans and animals more efficiently....you can see the same with archery games too...
well if knifes are used for other things...would anyone allow you to openly carry them into an airplane....or parliament...or even a shop??no
anyone call kill anyone with almost anything they find....you can use large stones or beer bottles or hammer or metal pipes etc etc....that doesnt mean govt should ban all of this to prevent murder....a firearm is the most effective weapon for defence as well as offence....there is no rule that every person that owns a firearm must or has killed someone...chances are if you point your firearm at an attacker ,he may run for his life without even trying to attack you....isnt that actually good?
yes i live in india and firearms are usually illegal for law abiding citizens and somehow legal for criminals..lol....what i meant was that its very difficult for a law abiding person to legally obtain a firearm ( he has to prove that his life is under threat or that his plantation is under attack from man eaters) whereas its pretty simple for a criminal to obtain one from black markets....which leaves the good guys defenseless.....moreover criminals use knifes and machetes if they dont find a firearm...so banning firearms dont do anything to reduce crimes...it just leaves the innocent guys defenseless...
in some US states people are allowed to easily buy firearms due to old laws i think, to protect people which i believe when the place was usually marauded by raiders..
see in the US majority of deaths by guns are suicide...and then you can see kids on killing spree running around shooting in school...that is because of irresponsible parents not locking up guns....gun owners must be educated to take responsibility to safely lock their firearms instead of banning them....
i think the UK is filled with cctv...but i dont believ that it stops crime..it just help identify criminals...and seeing from these figure..i guess you were lucky so far
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic…
www.bbc.com/news/magazine-1873…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The UK is about to be filled with even more CCTV. I think I just live in a less densely populated area so it's much more peaceful than everywhere else in the UK.
There doesn't seem to be many guns out here in the UK so everyone having guns isn't necessary. After asking my friend today, his opinion was that America should have gun control but it wouldn't work because there's already so many guns out there that only law abiding citizens would hand their guns in while the criminals keep them.
I agree that educating gun owners to keep and handle their weapons safely would be better but that should be a requirement by law before buying a gun, not just something that's encouraged. However, I still think that if they had gun control from the start when guns were no longer necessary, it would be much better because now it's too inconvenient to introduce gun control.
I think I might've been a little bit abusive and sarcastic in my first reply. If I have, sorry. My life hasn't been good recently and I've been getting angry at everyone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cctv are surveilance devices and does not prevent crime....atleast people who are afraid of jail would avoid commiting crime in front of a cctv but the bad guys wont...
almost everyday in tv i can see a lot of radicals rioting in the streets of UK...is that true???
yup...gun control would only stop the legal flow of firearms.....just like drugs are banned but you can still get it....the law abiding good guys must be allowed to protect themselves....because any nation is capable of arresting criminals who attack defenseless people and send them to jail...but only nations that allow good guys to protect themselves can avoid such tragedy happening in the first place....as the old saying goes, prevention is always better than cure...aint no good to nobody if a family member is killed and the criminal is sent to jail...its wiser and better to avoid that death in the first place by allowing them to protect themselves..
yeah ..most guns owners in the US are irresponsible...only an absolute dumbass would allow their child to have access to their firearm...
personally i'm a gun enthusiast...and because our govt is against guns...i ended up collecting replicas and airsofts as hobby....i never intend to fire any weapon at nobody even if i had access to real weapons...
i can perfectly understand when someone is having a tough time in life.....but hey...atleast you didnt try the evasive trollish replies like most guys do.....i respect people who are reasonable..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The radical protests are mainly in large cities, I haven't seen any where I live but there are sometimes protests from groups such as the anti-Islamic English Defence League. I might be going on a protest against our nuclear weapons as a lot of money is wasted on it and I don't really see much need for it. I can understand it would be different in India though because of tensions with Pakistan.
Thanks for accepting my apology, I have depression but because of our healthcare system, I've been waiting for 2 months now for therapy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
remembering that the Nazi rallies were mainly in the cities...but eventually took over the whole countryside too...
yup..nukes aint good...especially when you have no use for them and are not allowed to use them either...lol
Pakistan is exploiting our forgiveness and compassion...theres a limit to all that ya know...
i can understand your situation..coz i believe in this quote - “Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about.”
i hope you get well soon..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks.
It was nice to be able to share opinions with someone, I never really thought about gun control that much until now so my opinion's changed slightly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
good point point but i prefer to defend myself with a sword
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
no, with this: s1316.photobucket.com/user/e10…
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Nice. Each to their own. So long as they don't try to dictate into law what others can and can't use to defend themselves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
no, It's an Ulfbhert, it is a viking era sword and is consider one of the best to be forged in history, heck only the elites in viking society wielded one of these
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
awesome...
but i prefer this cgcookie.com/blender/files/201…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
good choice, except you need to have really good perception skills as all the weight in a lightsaber is in the hilt so you won't be able to "feel" the blades location.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
but i believe the force is strong with me....
look on the bright side...you wont cut a criminal and worry that he hill bleed to death ruining your carpet in the process
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Would anyone object to severe limitations on ammo to small caliber rounds for self defense, with everything else limited to gun ranges, police and military. Of course this idea will probably be rejected by those who believe that guns are needed to protect the people from government.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If you lived where I do, you would need large caliber (.41 or .44 Magnum revolvers, specifically) pistols and high power rifles (Remington Model 700, or 700 based designs, like my favorite... my Model 7 in .308).
I am VERY rural, police response time to me is 22 minutes (best to anywhere in my valley in 20+ years) or more, and my biggest threat is bears. (We have had two bear attacks on our farm animals in the last three years.) So... yes, I would object.
Personally, I HATE the AR-15. I was forced to use the M-16 (military version) for my first two years in the USMC. It is garbage (less range, less power, more failures to operate) compared to the M1 Garands and M-14 based rifles (M1A) I grew up shooting. Thankfully, I became a military bodyguard, using the DMR as my rifle, and only had to touch the "plastic abomination" once a year for qualifying. If people WANT to waste their money on an AR (Their loss, LOL) by all means. My 700 Sendero has TWICE the range and TRIPLE the downrange energy... far more useful for a farmer.
For what it is worth, I TEACH military (including the use of the M-16/ M-4... 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shameless criminals would dissagree with your message.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hurrah. We've got a natural born right to life, and that means defending that life with hot lead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Speaking of those rights that some people are ever demanding of God and man.... Here's the unspoken right of the Second Amendment. You have the Right not to be the victim of a violent crime, or live in fear of becoming such a victim. You have the Right to keep from being a victim by using a weapon to prevent that crime from happening. You have the Right to use firearms, because those are currently the most efficient weapons for that purpose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Some countries actually had laws that made it compulsory for law abiding citizens to own a gun or rifle, the argument was that the nation that was genuinely in arms could defend itself and so could individuals citizens.
The Boer republics back in the 19thC required All citizens to own a gun and keep at least 30 rounds of ammo on hand at all times in case of emergency or being called up to serve on Commando which worked like the old colonial militias.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gun control will have no effect if societal factors that contribute so heavily to crime-namely, poverty, inequality and subsequent tension-go unaddressed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And that's really the point that people like me try to make to the sheep of the world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You can always point to the example of Switzerland, where people are mandated to possess firearms by law, yet the lack of societal disparity that would contribute so heavily to crime means that they pretty much never have to use them. Besides, in going after gun owners in broad strokes, people completely overlook that the area where any control would actually be sorely needed would be in providing background checks for the certifiably mentally ill.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah, but can you say that ALL criminals are inherently, iredeemably evil? Why should I end the life of some 19 year old over something like property loss?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It has nothing to do with property. The moment someone invades your home or points a gun at you, your life is at risk. Cooperation is no insurance that you will not be harmed.
Anyway this is all besides the point because there is no requirement you have to use a gun if you have it. You can always chose not to draw and cooperate if you think that's the best option. But being armed gives you a much higher chance of survival if resistance is necessary.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If the guy is a destitution-driven criminal like most of them, then yes, Cooperation is a very big insurance you won't get killed. It always astounds me the gun lovers act like all criminals are driven by Charles Manson-like sadism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I don't give a damn why he's in my house. There is no justification you can provide to defend breaking into someone's home and terrorizing them. I have a right to defend myself and not be threatened by criminal thugs in my own home. Also, you fail to realize that in the majority of cases where guns are used in self defense, the gun was never even fired because it's mere presence alone was enough to deter the criminal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You sound like an easily frightened fellow. And oh "joy" more of that "just pointing a gun works" pixie dust!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Never mind. After having read your other comments it is clear you have your head crammed up your ass and are not worth debating with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Don't all liberals do though? Have their head up their ass? ~ C
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I refuse to call people like him liberals. They don't deserve to be called liberals. They're just left-wing fascists posing as liberals. I prefer the term "moonbat".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, it's not any insurance you won't get harmed. People can and do get harmed and/or killed without resisting. You might get killed so you can't ID him later at trial, or he might shoot you accidentally. As long as you had a gun pointed at you, you at risk, as most criminals are not too concerned with proper safe gun handling.
When you cooperate with a mugger, robber, etc, you are putting you're life in the hands of someone who clearly does not have your best interests in mind. Altogether that's not a good situation to be in. Complying may be the best option under the circumstances, but at the very least, it's reasonable to want the means to fight back in case your assailent decides to kill you or gives you a chance to exploit. Criminals don't always keep full attention on their victims and if you act like you are a defenseless sheep you might get the chance to take the situation out of his hands and put it back in yours, like what happened in this case:
www.shreveporttimes.com/articl…
But for not to be possible, you need to have the proper means.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Half my family lives in Tucson Arizona. They been robbed numerous times both when they were in and out of the house, and they never got shot. Not once.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, so what? Just because it didn't happen to them doesn't mean it never could happen to anyone.
My college roomate was in a small town that did not have any murders in the last 20 years when she was stabbed to death by her ex-boyfriend. You never know when or where you might be when you draw the short straw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Exactly! I'm practically a fatalist. When youre times up its up. Guns scarcely make any difference.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well I hope you can understand that not all of us are resigned to accepting such a fate without at least trying to alter it. And in that matter, guns do make a big difference. They won't ensure you will survive, but they will ensure you have a chance of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh gawsh, ur so right! Guns DO make a difference!
How could I have been so blind!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i'll see your fake story and raise you two real ones:
www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/j…
www.wnct.com/story/24292984/ho…
There are dozens more where these came from. Firearm self defense is not a rare occurrence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"dozens more" instances does not constitue as commonplace yo. If I wanted I could poop out hundreds of articles of kids accidently shooting themselves while playing with their parents guns, and I could just as well say "it is not a rare occurance"
Wooo internet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>