HOME | DD

IDeviant In reply to ArtByCher [2011-05-10 11:24:32 +0000 UTC]

This remains one of my all-time s too

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to TaraRoys [2009-05-18 13:39:21 +0000 UTC]

Your description is exactly what I hoped came through A resemblance to traditional abstracts with a residue of its fractal origin.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to contrarymary [2009-05-12 10:19:26 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps a little tweaking of the colours will get closer still

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to Beesknees67 [2009-04-28 15:00:15 +0000 UTC]

[link]

But if you'd prefer it here, I'll be happy to upload. I'm also including it in a planned 2010 calendar 'Abstracts'

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Beesknees67 In reply to IDeviant [2009-04-30 17:33:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the link...it seems an interesting site...so many choices to deplete my funds .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IDeviant In reply to Beesknees67 [2009-05-06 17:37:57 +0000 UTC]

It seems to be geared more towards the commercial, which is exactly what I was after. Still haven't sold a print yet, though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to zweeZwyy [2009-04-15 19:30:30 +0000 UTC]

I am indeed happy with this, the best of its kind so far IMO. What's especially gratifying is that the detail goes all the way down (click top left for preview at 6000 x 6000px): [link]

I'd almost given up as the first renders were blocky at high-res, then came that duh! moment in which I realised how simple it was to fix

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zweeZwyy In reply to IDeviant [2009-04-15 20:59:48 +0000 UTC]

Yes, see what you mean. Xlnt!

Of course there are how questions begging here. I'm just starting into hirez print territory, so prepare to be boarded

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IDeviant In reply to zweeZwyy [2009-04-18 10:49:25 +0000 UTC]

I'll bear it in mind

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to Vibratum [2009-04-13 18:19:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to tractern [2009-04-13 18:19:01 +0000 UTC]

Surprising that it's a single flame!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tractern In reply to IDeviant [2009-04-14 00:18:00 +0000 UTC]

Wow, yeah, man!

I can't really appreciate that fact all that much, as I don't use Apo, but still. It interests me, nonetheless.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IDeviant In reply to tractern [2009-04-14 15:02:53 +0000 UTC]

Totally understand, but I just wanted to emphasise that it wasn't layered

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to esintu [2009-04-13 18:18:08 +0000 UTC]

I was really pleased with the interplay of detail and broad-brush features See some large scale previews: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IDeviant In reply to winklepickers [2009-04-13 18:14:23 +0000 UTC]

I should remember to state for these - single Apo render using one of my 'secret' techniques

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

winklepickers In reply to IDeviant [2009-04-13 19:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Now what am I supposed to understand by that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0