HOME | DD

Published: 2007-04-29 07:16:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 2007; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 137
Redirect to original
Description
Today, PadleyWood Enterprises announces the launch of a new prototype integrated chip, codenamed simply G4. The chip is built to a fractal design that can simultaneously escalate and delegate tasks within its own holographic architecture according to the current level of complexity. With 4G!(2)B* integrated RAM and a clock speed of 4.2G!(2)Hz*, this is set not only to raise the roof of computing but to blow it off.I'm gonna plug this baby in
*for the benefit of non-mathematicians (and that includes me
Pure Apophysis
Related content
Comments: 43
SusanPhillips [2007-11-03 02:53:17 +0000 UTC]
You have made eye candy for a person momentarily fascinated by squares (me)!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to SusanPhillips [2007-11-05 07:37:27 +0000 UTC]
So much can be done with the basic polygons - I must research their symbolism
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HectorPineda [2007-11-03 01:45:03 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work!
I love science & art combitation...actually I studied science (Pharmaceutical).
RIGTH TO FAVS!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to HectorPineda [2007-11-05 07:32:08 +0000 UTC]
I suppose I'm actually a chemist by training, though I shall soon become a '
rofessional' chaotician
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mobilelectro [2007-05-16 18:22:55 +0000 UTC]
Your color choices really enhance the micro chip look. Maybe there is a future in fractally designed micro chips, some new approach where the chip grows when it is needed to speed up fractal renderings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to Mobilelectro [2007-05-17 06:36:17 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! For some reason, the parameters didn't autosave with this and so I've lost the identity of the gradient I might attempt a trial-and-error run of candidate gradients (it was one of the built-in selection) when I finally regain a working PC.
But, yes, there's certainly a spot of wishful thinking in the tongue-in-cheek description, perhaps partly inspired by the theories of holographic data storage - if it works for the static, perhaps there's a way of employing it dynamically...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
silwenka [2007-05-15 15:31:55 +0000 UTC]
Gimme this one! I am sure this will makes my comp muuuuch more beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to silwenka [2007-05-16 06:18:31 +0000 UTC]
Shipping right now I cannot currently harness its power: my PC's down
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fractalinda [2007-04-30 20:28:10 +0000 UTC]
An incredibly detailed design and the most beautiful color combo. Excellent work..and you're wit is pretty cool, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to fractalinda [2007-05-06 11:02:58 +0000 UTC]
And I could curse as the parameters didn't automatically save like they normally do, so I'd struggle to identify the gradient again
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fractalinda In reply to IDeviant [2007-05-09 05:32:39 +0000 UTC]
Oh I've done that! Very sad and maddening!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IDeviant In reply to ClaireJones [2007-05-06 10:45:24 +0000 UTC]
This'll speed up my rendering a wee bit
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IDeviant In reply to bluesman219 [2007-05-05 09:20:41 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, Phil - I'm loving this technique
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bluesman219 In reply to IDeviant [2007-05-06 06:23:09 +0000 UTC]
I can see why Ian. Your very welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gibson125 [2007-04-29 20:45:16 +0000 UTC]
No limits to the Serpinski Triangle. I only assume this is the case of course.
Very nice image Ian.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to Gibson125 [2007-04-30 04:30:41 +0000 UTC]
I've seen these around and assumed the same myself, until I stumbled upon this little hint . It was great when the first one finally clicked into place, then the parameters didn't autosave, I reconstructed it next day with the transforms in a different order, and it was even better
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
baba49 [2007-04-29 20:18:51 +0000 UTC]
Great work. This looks like a silk wall carpet to me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to baba49 [2007-04-30 05:36:04 +0000 UTC]
I think I'm adopting this as a Rorschach test for geekdom - that's the third fabric-based comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to IDeviant [2007-05-02 23:19:52 +0000 UTC]
Good idea Don't forget to copyright the idea ;D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AiyahLynne [2007-04-29 16:39:40 +0000 UTC]
oooh getting all technical on us now huh? hehe. nice rendition of a chip....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to AiyahLynne [2007-04-30 05:30:25 +0000 UTC]
I wonder how many would have fallen for this and its little write-up if published on a semi-technical blog on, well, what better date than April 1st
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AiyahLynne In reply to IDeviant [2007-04-30 15:17:21 +0000 UTC]
at least a few LOL.. there are always a few....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to AiyahLynne [2007-05-05 09:44:45 +0000 UTC]
I'm sure I once adopted a variant of that as my third law ("There's always one", I think it went). Damned if I can remember what #1 and #2 were...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AiyahLynne In reply to IDeviant [2007-05-06 16:09:38 +0000 UTC]
ahhh sounds like you have sometimerz sometimes, i think i have alltimerz
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to AiyahLynne [2007-05-08 12:00:29 +0000 UTC]
Brilliant coinage I had to think about that one for a while
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AiyahLynne In reply to IDeviant [2007-05-08 17:10:28 +0000 UTC]
hehe. You can thank my roommate - she actually accuses me of it most times
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thelma1 [2007-04-29 14:33:36 +0000 UTC]
The details in this are really fabulous, a true patchwork of beauty
--
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to Thelma1 [2007-04-30 05:26:50 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! It was most gratifying to learn this technique
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LaPurr [2007-04-29 07:40:12 +0000 UTC]
For the true non-mathematicians like me (LOL), this looks like a fractal quilt. As an art quilt, this would be beautiful! Great use of colors and the different areas are well-defined by color and light and lines.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to LaPurr [2007-04-29 10:17:43 +0000 UTC]
A quilt? Show me the hands that could fashion this, and I'll have them trace the Mandelbrot set on my back... with massage oil My money's still on the solid state electronics
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LaPurr In reply to IDeviant [2007-04-29 10:37:06 +0000 UTC]
If I were still quilting and had the inclination, I could make a facsimile of this. I'd use 1" as the guide and use lots of pieces that were 1" square finished size. It would be a fairly big quilt and it would take a while to find the right fabrics and sew it together, but I could do it.
Get out the oil and warm it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDeviant In reply to LaPurr [2007-04-29 15:14:07 +0000 UTC]
1", eh? That quilt would need to cover a modest village to get the required detail Still, plenty of room... but perhaps I'd better take the oiling first
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LaPurr In reply to IDeviant [2007-04-29 16:28:25 +0000 UTC]
No, not that huge. Look at the horizontal tan bars (for lack of another way to say this) and you'll see above or below them are green and white-ish areas. If those are 1" wide, you can see that this would be about a queen size quilt. I would use patterned fabrics and cheat on the detail. As I said, it would be a facsimile, not an exact duplicate.
Warm up that oil.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1