HOME | DD
ImdaBatman β Another thing that I'm not apologizing for
Published: 2014-07-15 03:19:25 +0000 UTC; Views: 890; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
The running caption for this was "Plagiarism: Disney's modus operandi" but they actually had the legal rights to most of the stuff they've ripped off, so it didn't make much sense.I don't actually watch either of these shows (Sabrina because I've never just sat down and tried it, Wizards because I know Disney and that their shows suck) but when you have 2 little sisters who have a bad habbit of leaving the TV volume really high, and when you're really bad at just tuning out noises around you, you tend to pick up some stuff.
Also, I'd just like to make it perfectly clear that I'm not apologizing to any Disney fans for making this. Just like all those times I proudly declared that I wasn't going to apologize to Taylor Swift's fans for calling her a whore. (Which I won't, because she is!)
EDIT: Does anyone reading this understand the actual point that I'm trying to make!?
Disclaimer: I don't own. "Sabrina the Teenage Witch" owned by...ABC, I think. "Wizards of Waverly Place" (ugh, I nearly threw up just typing that) is owned by Disney.
Related content
Comments: 20
sorry. i still don't like her, but i will admit that i shouldn't have called her that here
π: 0 β©: 1
Thank you for apologizing. You don't have to like her. It is still important to be nice though. c:Β
π: 0 β©: 1
thank you for furthering my point
π: 0 β©: 0
Playing devil's advocate here: Wizards had a very different mythos than Sabrina. The idea? Done to death. The magic itself? Unique.
π: 0 β©: 2
well, they both pretty much made up the ridiculously arbitrary rules of their versions of magic as they went along, constantly pulling new things out of their asses. though at least Sabrina had some clever word play added in
π: 0 β©: 1
That's pretty true.
π: 0 β©: 0
Disney owns ABC, so technically Disney owns both properties.
π: 0 β©: 1
That's pretty much what I said when Disney bought . . . anything Disney bought in the last decade.
π: 0 β©: 1
I know too little about Taylor Swift to know if she's a "whore" or not... but, why do you even feel like calling out on it if she is? I mean... is it really your concern how much or little she has sex? 
π: 0 β©: 1
Dude, I have an entirely different demotivational for this subject. Go comment there.
And I'm not calling her that because of how much sex she has (that is NOT how I roll) I'm calling her that because she just goes around dumping people just so she can victemize herself in another song, because apparently she NEEDS a boyfriend to be happy (as her lyrics so often claim) yet she keeps dumping them to win another Grammy.
π: 0 β©: 1
You have? I wouldn't know where to find it, but okay...
Well, I don't think "whore" is the appropriate word to use for that, but okay...
π: 0 β©: 1
It's under "demotivationals" titled "I thought I'd start doing celebrity entries".
Well, normally I wouldn't use it. Normally it goes against my principles.Β But every rule has an exception. (Except the rules of the internet, that is)
π: 0 β©: 1
Kay.
Well... I just don't like it since it's gender-specific. Like, it's okay to call her a whore for what she does because she is a woman.
π: 0 β©: 0