HOME | DD

jflaxman — Tarkavian Decimator

#air #aircraft #airstrip #alternate #alternative #attack #blood #boom #cas #close #concept #decimator #dieselpunk #engineering #fiction
Published: 2018-07-16 11:41:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 36910; Favourites: 1045; Downloads: 336
Redirect to original
Description

The Tarkavian Collective’s aptly-named Decimator was made to support ground assaults. It saw its first deployment during the Hassadian Campaign, where its effectiveness against enemy armour, supply lines and command posts helped ensure Collective victory. Decimator squadrons have since faced tougher opposition in colder Verengean skies, but their pilots’ experience – together with the upgrades made to their battle-tested planes – have often given them the edge against their more numerous but less well-equipped and well-organised foes.

Design Features

- The Decimator’s unusual layout is a logical choice for a ground attack aircraft. The twin booms help strengthen the tailplane and shield it from enemy fire; having two vertical tails and rudders means control can be retained if one is badly damaged or destroyed; and the enclosed pusher prop is less likely to strike obstacles and careless or distracted ground crew. A relatively short sloped nose and slightly swept back wings improve ground visibility, aiding target acquisition and making landing easier. Drawbacks include slower roll rates and poor rearward visibility – more serious concerns for fighters than planes used for close air support.

- The Decimator’s V12 engine drives a four-bladed pusher prop with variable and reversible pitch. The latter setting can be used as an airbrake after touchdown and lets pilots taxi in reverse – ideally with directions from ground crew. Some highly skilled or reckless pilots have briefly reversed pitch in flight to slow dives, prolong strafing runs, or fall behind pursuing fighters, but this places great stress on the airframe and can easily induce a stall.

- A retractable tricycle undercarriage – which includes a steerable nose wheel – makes ground handling easier, especially on rough frontline airstrips. The two rear wheels fold backwards into the twin tail booms, providing more space for underwing hardpoints. This system also gives the prop more ground clearance and a parked aircraft a more level stance, allowing fast refuelling and rearmament.

- The air intakes are positioned above and slightly behind the wings’ leading edge to shield them from ground debris. If the engine is badly damaged in combat its rear placement means fire, smoke and fumes are usually swept away from the cockpit instead of being blown into it, giving pilots more time to react than those in more conventional single-engine aircraft. From their first inception Decimators were fitted with ejector seats; besides throwing pilots clear of the prop, this increases their chance of surviving low altitude and/or high speed exits.

- The rear placement of the engine means guns can be concentrated in the Decimator’s armoured nose and the lack of interrupter gear gives them a higher rate of fire. Three standard modules can be fitted depending on mission requirements: eight 13mm machine guns, four 20mm autocannons or two 30mm autocannons. An additional eight underwing hardpoints can carry light bombs or unguided rockets; these tend to be less accurate but can devastate large areas.

- This Decimator’s colour scheme is well-suited to northern regions, though in winter the grey-green camouflage is usually replaced with plain white. The black lightning bolts are seen on most Collective aircraft, though the Decimator’s unique shape also wards off friendly fire. White numbers on the tail booms and one wing identify the aircraft and the unit it belongs to in a clear and concise way. By contrast the dragon’s skull – along with the small human skulls which record the pilot’s kills – are added to inspire fear and encourage an aggressive mindset.

Related content
Comments: 95

paws4thot In reply to ??? [2018-07-17 09:02:27 +0000 UTC]

Also jflaxman - It's not uncommon on modern turboprop airliners and transports, so they can brake faster after landing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to paws4thot [2018-07-19 22:27:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the extra info - it's a sensible feature for heavier aircraft!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

paws4thot In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-20 08:18:39 +0000 UTC]

"Heavier?" I've encountered it on 20 to 30 sear feederliners.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to paws4thot [2018-08-02 01:23:39 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for any misunderstanding - 20 or 30 seats is big when you're used to planes that carry 6 at most!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

paws4thot In reply to jflaxman [2018-08-02 09:15:23 +0000 UTC]

Ah OK. I'm not used to anything smaller than an Otter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jflaxman In reply to ??? [2018-07-17 02:26:44 +0000 UTC]

Variable pitch is nothing new, and some planes use reversible pitch to brake or reverse after landing - one example being the B-29 (this feature may have saved the Bockscar during an emergency landing). Using it in flight would be much less dangerous for an aircraft with a pusher prop, but you'd have to be brave or desperate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lamp-P0st In reply to ??? [2018-07-17 01:39:10 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of the Vampire/Venom or the Narval

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DeadlierTrain67 In reply to ??? [2018-07-17 00:03:04 +0000 UTC]

*Pearl Jam intensifies*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ghost-Studio-Devs In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 23:50:59 +0000 UTC]

cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Novaprime12 [2018-07-16 23:30:42 +0000 UTC]

it actually seems like you were going for a look similar to the S.O 8000 narval from france

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to Novaprime12 [2018-07-16 23:54:05 +0000 UTC]

The Narval had a similar layout, but I got more inspiration from Sweden's SAAB 21.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Novaprime12 In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-17 00:11:46 +0000 UTC]

i see. I would love to talk planes with you some day. Maybe pass on ideas that may be helpful with my creative improvements to existing planes. I helped design a jet powered bf110 in my war thunder discord, looks really cool, if you'd like i can link it to you in notes if you want to chat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheAsianGuyLOL [2018-07-16 22:21:27 +0000 UTC]

Awesome attacker there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

spacegoblin [2018-07-16 22:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Very cool 😊

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

niks25 [2018-07-16 21:52:04 +0000 UTC]

Love this WW2 Luftwaffe influence. Loving every detail of it. Don't know how to take my eyes off it. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to niks25 [2018-07-17 00:24:15 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! You'll soon be seeing more!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

niks25 In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-17 10:56:06 +0000 UTC]

NOICE

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrowncoatMando [2018-07-16 21:44:46 +0000 UTC]

I've always liked Pusher prop aircraft.
kind of a Crimson Skies version of a Skyraider

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to BrowncoatMando [2018-07-16 22:57:04 +0000 UTC]

I've heard great things about Crimson Skies - it seems a remake is long overdue!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrowncoatMando In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-17 01:56:00 +0000 UTC]

I agree- that said, it remains the only game I have ever rage quit. I haven't been back to it since.  It's that hard

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AzabacheSilver In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 20:20:32 +0000 UTC]

That looks like a SAAB 21 fighter fresh off the production line in hell!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAAB_21
SAAB 21

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to AzabacheSilver [2018-07-16 22:56:23 +0000 UTC]

That was my main influence, though I felt the twin boom pusher layout might work best for a ground attack aircraft!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rexlare In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 19:57:18 +0000 UTC]

I love this design. The dragon and human skulls are a very nice touch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to Rexlare [2018-07-16 22:54:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I got the idea for the dragon skull from classic shark-mouth paint jobs which I'll use on later naval aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rexlare In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-16 23:02:50 +0000 UTC]

With that in mind, I'd like to imagine some poor souls being like
"Yeah well sharks can't fly, so we're good."
Then suddenly the dragons show up. That's sure to make a head line.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EternalUniverse1 In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 19:37:41 +0000 UTC]

Very nicely made.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Timespade [2018-07-16 19:33:13 +0000 UTC]

That looks suspiciously like a certain french prototype aircraft named the narval

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AtlasTheProto In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 19:00:31 +0000 UTC]

Why does this look so similar to the SNCASO SO.8000 Narval Naval French Fighter?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to AtlasTheProto [2018-07-16 22:51:01 +0000 UTC]

I'm familiar with the Narval fighter and think it was a decent concept; the aft engine/forward cockpit would have made carrier landings easier and refitting it with a jet engine wouldn't have been too hard. The Decimator owes more to the SAAB 21, another twin boom pusher design.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AtlasTheProto In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-18 05:51:48 +0000 UTC]

ah, cool!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Squidpasta In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 17:19:28 +0000 UTC]

that skull design is amazingly cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to Squidpasta [2018-07-16 22:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! I'll be using it again.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Danubium [2018-07-16 16:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Too bad the Saab 21 never got a chance to prove...


...or rather, thank heavens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

vanOerle In reply to Danubium [2023-09-14 18:35:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jflaxman In reply to Danubium [2018-07-16 22:45:12 +0000 UTC]

I guess it depends on your personal views and the cause it would have fought for. In the English-speaking world WW2 is usually presented as a black-and-white struggle between good and evil, but for many smaller European nations - especially those caught between the USSR and Germany - the only likely outcome was a future dominated by a foreign totalitarian state, which for most of Eastern Europe turned out to be USSR.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Boraini [2018-07-16 16:18:17 +0000 UTC]

*heavy breathing*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pelzknaeul91 [2018-07-16 16:09:55 +0000 UTC]

Very big similarities to a Pi-38 Lightning Nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesF63 [2018-07-16 15:26:39 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful design and render!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Arte-de-Junqueiro In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 12:56:15 +0000 UTC]

Another classic!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to Arte-de-Junqueiro [2018-07-16 22:33:55 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

curtsibling [2018-07-16 11:50:35 +0000 UTC]

Echoes of the FW-189 twin engine birds or the Henschel tank busters...But perfectly fits with your alt-world series...Stunning creation, man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jflaxman In reply to curtsibling [2018-07-16 22:31:27 +0000 UTC]

I thought you'd like this one! My main influence was the SAAB 21 - a great plane that never saw combat - but the armament owes more to the Hawker Typhoon, which saw a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

skyraidernimrod2 In reply to ??? [2018-07-16 11:47:13 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me a bit of old Fokker designs from WW2 that the Dutch used in small numbers. VERY cool! Your artwork always amazes me! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AquasGunnar In reply to skyraidernimrod2 [2018-07-17 01:54:09 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me a little bit of the P-38 as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |