HOME | DD

#air #aircraft #airstrip #alternate #alternative #attack #blood #boom #cas #close #concept #decimator #dieselpunk #engineering #fiction
Published: 2018-07-16 11:41:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 36907; Favourites: 1045; Downloads: 336
Redirect to original
Description
The Tarkavian Collective’s aptly-named Decimator was made to support ground assaults. It saw its first deployment during the Hassadian Campaign, where its effectiveness against enemy armour, supply lines and command posts helped ensure Collective victory. Decimator squadrons have since faced tougher opposition in colder Verengean skies, but their pilots’ experience – together with the upgrades made to their battle-tested planes – have often given them the edge against their more numerous but less well-equipped and well-organised foes.
Design Features
- The Decimator’s unusual layout is a logical choice for a ground attack aircraft. The twin booms help strengthen the tailplane and shield it from enemy fire; having two vertical tails and rudders means control can be retained if one is badly damaged or destroyed; and the enclosed pusher prop is less likely to strike obstacles and careless or distracted ground crew. A relatively short sloped nose and slightly swept back wings improve ground visibility, aiding target acquisition and making landing easier. Drawbacks include slower roll rates and poor rearward visibility – more serious concerns for fighters than planes used for close air support.
- The Decimator’s V12 engine drives a four-bladed pusher prop with variable and reversible pitch. The latter setting can be used as an airbrake after touchdown and lets pilots taxi in reverse – ideally with directions from ground crew. Some highly skilled or reckless pilots have briefly reversed pitch in flight to slow dives, prolong strafing runs, or fall behind pursuing fighters, but this places great stress on the airframe and can easily induce a stall.
- A retractable tricycle undercarriage – which includes a steerable nose wheel – makes ground handling easier, especially on rough frontline airstrips. The two rear wheels fold backwards into the twin tail booms, providing more space for underwing hardpoints. This system also gives the prop more ground clearance and a parked aircraft a more level stance, allowing fast refuelling and rearmament.
- The air intakes are positioned above and slightly behind the wings’ leading edge to shield them from ground debris. If the engine is badly damaged in combat its rear placement means fire, smoke and fumes are usually swept away from the cockpit instead of being blown into it, giving pilots more time to react than those in more conventional single-engine aircraft. From their first inception Decimators were fitted with ejector seats; besides throwing pilots clear of the prop, this increases their chance of surviving low altitude and/or high speed exits.
- The rear placement of the engine means guns can be concentrated in the Decimator’s armoured nose and the lack of interrupter gear gives them a higher rate of fire. Three standard modules can be fitted depending on mission requirements: eight 13mm machine guns, four 20mm autocannons or two 30mm autocannons. An additional eight underwing hardpoints can carry light bombs or unguided rockets; these tend to be less accurate but can devastate large areas.
- This Decimator’s colour scheme is well-suited to northern regions, though in winter the grey-green camouflage is usually replaced with plain white. The black lightning bolts are seen on most Collective aircraft, though the Decimator’s unique shape also wards off friendly fire. White numbers on the tail booms and one wing identify the aircraft and the unit it belongs to in a clear and concise way. By contrast the dragon’s skull – along with the small human skulls which record the pilot’s kills – are added to inspire fear and encourage an aggressive mindset.
Related content
Comments: 95
DoggoDude448 [2022-02-27 09:24:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to DoggoDude448 [2022-02-28 03:44:19 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
UncleBuddha513 [2021-08-14 15:31:16 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
GalaxyCat156 [2021-05-14 05:16:04 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
KumoRocks [2021-03-19 07:58:07 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
DoggoDude448 In reply to KumoRocks [2022-02-27 09:23:17 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
duck-norris In reply to KumoRocks [2021-03-25 07:55:37 +0000 UTC]
👍: 3 ⏩: 0
gothold [2020-08-08 18:33:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Burke23 [2019-04-29 08:47:43 +0000 UTC]
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thormemeson [2018-08-10 23:58:43 +0000 UTC]
I am not sure what I like more your body horror or aircraft
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tui0r [2018-07-24 18:39:11 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of the American XP- 55 Ascender, even though I understand why some people mention the French Narval.
I dind't know that the Saab 21 R even existed, but I googled it and I see the resemblance clearly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paws4thot In reply to tui0r [2018-08-02 09:09:03 +0000 UTC]
I see your point about the Ascender.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cullyferg2010 [2018-07-19 03:21:12 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of a Swedish Saab that started out as prop driven before being converted to jet power.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
paws4thot In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-08-02 09:10:00 +0000 UTC]
Well, the SAAB J-21 was originally designed as a pusher specifically so it could be converted to a jet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to paws4thot [2018-08-05 00:31:25 +0000 UTC]
I believe that was what the Swedes initially did before moving onto something a bit better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paws4thot In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-08-06 08:46:11 +0000 UTC]
It was; it was also the design intention behind the Kyushu J7W Shinden in Japan.
I think all this discussion is kudos points for just how believable 's design idea is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-07-19 11:20:20 +0000 UTC]
It's great to hear someone mention the SAAB as it was my main influence! For some reason I've had more people saying "S.O. 8000 Narval" (another twin boom pusher design).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-20 01:35:34 +0000 UTC]
Haven't heard of that second aircraft you mentioned. Any idea of what country it's from?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to cullyferg2010 [2018-07-20 04:47:04 +0000 UTC]
It was a postwar French design that came too late for mass production - by then the jet age had begun.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-21 04:15:41 +0000 UTC]
Still a good looking aircraft. That's a sizable air filter on the side.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jflaxman In reply to Viergacht [2018-07-18 23:24:16 +0000 UTC]
I know this is very different from the sort of work you normally post, but when it comes to aircraft design I try to factor in some science as you so often do in creature design. Background research always helps, though I often get the feeling I'm standing on the shoulders of giants!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Viergacht In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-19 08:06:38 +0000 UTC]
I can see the care and thought you put into your art
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
plushman [2018-07-18 12:08:34 +0000 UTC]
sexy beast nice, I see why you would need an ejector seat however another solution for a perhaps earlier design would be an emergency prop release/buckler to either drop or bend back the prop blades
Good job overall
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to plushman [2018-07-19 11:40:03 +0000 UTC]
I see where you're coming from - an emergency prop release might be a better fit for a dieselpunk setting. In this world early model Sunbeams used it before it was augmented by Tarkavian-style ejector seats.
I'm hoping to give each faction a distinct character, and with the Tarkavians I'm going for that sense of high-tech malevolence I get from sites like Luft 46 (in case you haven't checked it out, it's an apolitical site that catalogues German aircraft concepts from WW2). The Germans used ejector seats on a limited scale in WW2, but this plane owes more to the SAAB 21, which used a similar system the Swedes developed independently.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
plushman In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-20 00:18:12 +0000 UTC]
Cool to hear heavy world development and the design thought, cheers for the site reference aswell
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Neiot [2018-07-17 05:41:26 +0000 UTC]
Damn, this is a superb design for a fictional aeroplane. Great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Neiot In reply to jflaxman [2018-07-17 06:13:24 +0000 UTC]
I am creating a world where a race of alien creatures learn some human invention and basically reinvent the wheel. What expert advice do you have for someone like me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zenki1389 [2018-07-17 04:13:33 +0000 UTC]
awesome man! really nice! I am try to build an A10 warthog model kit, I would be really honored if you let me use the paint scheme in it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to zenki1389 [2018-07-17 06:11:34 +0000 UTC]
I'd be honoured if you used it! If you're going to post photos online I wouldn't mind some credit though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
paws4thot In reply to MelvWolfe [2018-07-17 09:00:33 +0000 UTC]
Likewise, with elements from the Kyushu J7W Shinden?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jflaxman In reply to MelvWolfe [2018-07-19 22:26:02 +0000 UTC]
It's mostly SAAB, but I've got plans for a Shinden-like plane as well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pachumaster [2018-07-17 02:03:38 +0000 UTC]
coolest plane I'll ever see, I can't get over that nose art. I never heard of reversible pitch, are you sure it's possible? are there any real world examples of that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
| Next =>