HOME | DD

Published: 2018-06-25 21:10:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 2929; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description
(aka Animation Unknown #36)Welcome friend to what I'd like to (finally) call Amblimation Unknown Week. Yes, Amblimation: the Sega Dreamcast of animation studios. It came out of nowhere, had a lot of gret things to offer and seemed like the next big thing but, even though it died with the 90's, it's still fondly regarded by those who've seen it. This will be a first for Animation Unknown as we have an entire COMPANY that qualifies for a slot, but considering how little they actually put out, I figured might as well tackle it all. I don't normally review film STUDIOS--especially not based on potential--but this studio died long before its time to shine and I think we should finally give it the recognition it deserves. First, a little background.
Amblimation is a now-defunct branch of Steven Spielberg's Amblin Entertainment, which only lasted from 1989 to 1997 and released 3 films. The VIRTUAL BOY had a larger library than that, and on even shorter a lifespan too! While there were 3 movies, the studio's next project would've been an adaptation of Andrew Llyod Webber's musical Cats but that probably would've been their swan song anyway. All 3 movies were directed by Simon Wells (the great-grandson of famous author H.G. Wells; seriously, look it up), who's only other claim to fame is the long-forgotten and atrocious 2002 remake of his grandfather's sci-fi novel The Time Machine--which was his very last directing move before moving into story artist work in quite a few films over the years. Extra 1/2 Star for all 3 movies I'll be reviewing right off the bat. So...without further ado, let's get started with Balto:
Plot- Set in 1925 Nome, Alaska, the film is a historical fiction based on the 1925 serum run that saved countless children during a diphtheria outbreak. Balto, our lead character, is a part-husky/part-wolf who takes place in a race to earn a spot amongst the fastest sled dogs in Alaska. However, he must overcome the predjudice of both the town and his fellow sleg dogs, including the conniving, ruthless Steel.
Characters- for the characters, we've got some amazing talent across the board: Kevin Bacon playing the street-smart but also secretly lonely Balto, Bob Hoskins as Balto's sole friend Boris the snow goose and the film's source of comic relief, Jodi Benson as Balto's love interest Jenna, and thevery prolific Alan Cumming as Steel. While everyone manages a fantastic performance, it's Steel who's the real MVP here.
I'm seriously shocked that he doesn't end up in more Underrated Villain lists because his totally unexplained vendetta against Balto is just absurd. Sure, you can argue that it might be because he thinks Balto is tring to steal Jenna from him or took his place as head of the pack, but he goes as far as tampering with trail marks to get them lost. STEEL IS WILLING TO LET CHILDREN DIE just to spite his rival!
While we're at it, might as well throw Enjoyment into there too because I don't have a lot to add to this segment: Everyone who's seen this movie, myself included, still say that it holds up pretty well. From the animation (which I'll touch on in a bit), to the cast, to the amazing looking ice and snow (and this was YEARS before snow and ice would be perfected in animation by Frozen), it's a movie that will leave a noticable, lasting impression on you for years to come.
Creativity- You may recall I referred to this as a "historical fiction" and there's a reason for that. Yes, there was actually a part-wolf Husky who did run in the Serum run to Nome, but it was only in the final leg of the race where another dog named Togo actually handled the most difficult part of the race. This is common knowledge, thanks to the Internet. However, historical accuracy shoudn't make a movie any less enjoyable or fun; just look at Abe Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. Despite a few faults, if this was the movie Amblimation were going out on then I'd say they had a strong finish.
Animation- This is going to be a new segment I introduce for Animation Unknown going forward. Now I've said time and again that good animation is not a requirement for a good story, and in fact a good story can make up for bad animation if it's done correctly (look at South Park, or Bojack Hoseman, or even Archer). However, this one is only on a 1 to 5 scale and I won't do this unless I feel it necessary.
Amblimation had an amazing talent for some of the best non-Disney animation of the time and I can't even tell you how many times I've had to tell people that movies like Balto were NOT some lost Don Bluth movie or something. Since this section is going to be rendered redundant for the rest of this theme week, just assume it gets a 5 out of 5 because it's not like you can argue that.
Execution- would this movie have been any better if Togo were in it? I'm not here to answer that so I can't say for certain. Is the movie still fun on it's own? Absolutely! While by no means a flawless film (the emotional moments can feel just a bit hamfisted at times, Steel lacks much motivation...or subtlety, and the polar bears I failed to mention don't make for decent comc relief), it's a very enjoyable experience and, like the other movies we'll be getting to, it was a victim of "Right Place, Wrong Time" opening against Toy Story. The sequels? That's not up to me, but they're certainly a step down.
Final Score: Plot (7), Characters (8), Enjoyment (8), Creativity (6), Execution (7)= 36 + Extra Credit (1/2 Star for Simon Wells, 1/2 for Amblimation, 1 Star for Animation, 1/2 or the studio's final release)= 48/50
Tomorrow: We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story.
Related content
Comments: 41
GregoryMoralesJR2016 [2020-06-11 21:04:26 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-07-30 12:31:10 +0000 UTC]
I feel like movie as this should stop to pretend to be based on true stories and making their own stories.
Example: the sequels were as based on a true story as they were realistic
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-10-25 21:49:47 +0000 UTC]
Balto WAS a true story. But they made it into somewhat their own little story but included the MAIN story it was based off of. And Balto II and III were NOT based on a TRUE story.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-10-27 21:32:40 +0000 UTC]
I know this. The first one was a twisted fictionalized version of the real life thing.
And if was a whole original movies my problems would gone away.
Because the sequels weren't even based on a true story as the first
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-10-27 22:44:37 +0000 UTC]
Well, they tried to mainly keep childrens interest in the movie.. It IS a kid's movie after all..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-11-01 11:37:43 +0000 UTC]
I know, but the point is that it would have been so much better if was just and already an original story that doesn't use real life experinces of someone who existed
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-11-01 17:29:33 +0000 UTC]
Yea ig. Otherwise its still a good movie
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-11-02 12:20:58 +0000 UTC]
I know. But my point is that I don't know how the sequels were based on a true story
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-11-03 03:24:11 +0000 UTC]
No XD Not that I know of
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-11-03 11:06:43 +0000 UTC]
for saying that they weren't true stories
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-11-03 20:38:03 +0000 UTC]
I dont think they were based on true stories. All besides the first movie X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-11-04 19:32:07 +0000 UTC]
this is my point, giving how unrelated the sequels were what was the point to say they were based on a true character?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-11-04 22:56:13 +0000 UTC]
Hmm.... I don't think they wanted to harm the true history but just make an enjoyable kid movie.... Idk tho tbh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to Baltolover21 [2018-11-07 20:07:54 +0000 UTC]
I know that. But why make a fictional sequel of a true story?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baltolover21 In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-11-07 22:30:16 +0000 UTC]
No Idea! Maybe it got so big
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-07-30 21:21:42 +0000 UTC]
You make a very good point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-07-31 21:15:00 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I saw a lot of these history fictions movies, and using real life people for tales or for not respectful representation isn't right.
Like the animated Titanic or that christianic propaganda Pocahontas movie
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Jioseph-superfan63 [2018-07-31 22:24:23 +0000 UTC]
I'm fine with twisting the facts if it leads to a decent final product; Balto and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter are doing it right (maybe not on the same level but within the same concept), whereas movies like Patch Adams and JFK are taking the actual people/history and tearing out huge chunks while crumpling up the rest and throwing it out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jioseph-superfan63 In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-08-01 11:26:03 +0000 UTC]
In Balto's case I felt like they needed to write an original character isntead of twisting a real one.
I loved both book and movie of Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, and that was a good history fiction that didn't destroyed what the real life character was.
But yes Patch Adams, JFK, that Titanic animated movies or that christianic propagandas cartoons from MondoTV needs to be more respectful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Club-Dreamiverse [2018-06-26 20:00:31 +0000 UTC]
Cool! Care to see my and a few others' ideas if you'd like?
If Sony sells its entertainment assets............If Sony sells its entertainment assets to various companies and focuses on its technological mojo, just like its new CEO Kenichiro Yoshida planned it (he did say "Change is urgent", after all),
https://www.business2community.com/entertainment/sony-pictures-might-sale-means-02006706
https://www.cbr.com/sony-television-film-for-sale-marvel-spider-man/
here's some possibilities about what could happen:
* If Sony sells its TV/film assets -- the Sony Pictures Entertainment group -- to either my future studio Dreamiverse Studios, Warner Bros. or Paramount, as :iconMickeycraft392: planned it, or Disney, as :iconKawaiiWonder: said, we could see better movies or television shows. Even better, the movie rights to all the Spider-Man characters could get back into the Marvel Cinematic Universe completely.
** What's more, either Warner Bros.' or Paramount's animation divisions might merge with Sony Pictures Animation.
* If Sony sells its music assets to either EMI, UMG or WMG, we could get improved
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Club-Dreamiverse [2018-06-27 04:31:57 +0000 UTC]
Sure, I'll gladly look these over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Club-Dreamiverse In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-06-27 04:33:25 +0000 UTC]
Good luck, my friend Zander.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Club-Dreamiverse [2018-06-27 07:54:50 +0000 UTC]
These are some interesting ideas, but I have reservations with a couple of them. I doubt Sony is still holding a torch for Nintendo to post-humunously release a “Nintendo Playstation”, especially since Sony’s PS1 was the equivalent of leaving your bride at the altar and then finding out she married your boss and they BOTH have it out for you. There’s a lot to unpack in all that otherwise so what would you consider the top 5/10 ideas off that list?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Club-Dreamiverse In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-06-27 14:43:41 +0000 UTC]
Perhaps the Universal-Discovery-CBS/Lionsgate-Paramount-DHX Media/STX Entertainment merger and the Disney-Warner Bros.-Fox-Sony Pictures-MGM merger?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Club-Dreamiverse [2018-06-27 19:47:41 +0000 UTC]
That's a lot of mergers. It's only a matter of time before we start developing monopolies
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Club-Dreamiverse In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-06-27 19:48:23 +0000 UTC]
But that would be still awesome or no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to Club-Dreamiverse [2018-06-27 20:19:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, a monopoly would end up gridlocking society. As it is, Disney basically single-handedly scared off every other animation game so they can run almost totally unopposed. At this point, they might as well run for president; it’s not like it’s be a step DOWN from the nuclear/social Armageddon we’re heading towards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Club-Dreamiverse In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-06-27 20:28:23 +0000 UTC]
I heard from /Zee that Warner Bros. CEO Kevin Tsujihara would be the head of Disney-Warner and Jim Gianopulos the head of Universal-Paramount as they're quite responsible in terms of films and television shows, should these mergers happen and the film and TV industry wars will be put to pasture. Same thing with the gaming industry, as Nintendo might acquire Sony's PlayStation and games and Sega acquires Atari and Microsoft's gaming assets combined. Thus, both industries would be at peace.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to oboeshoes16 [2018-06-26 19:01:44 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I saw this one not too long ago and it still holds up pretty well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kyrtuck [2018-06-26 15:38:22 +0000 UTC]
I thought Balto was a well known animated film? Enough to have 1 or two sequels and ripoffs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to kyrtuck [2018-06-26 19:01:12 +0000 UTC]
It’s far enough under the radar that it’s not really a household name but it’s got a very sizable cult following (thanks to a massive popularity in Home video sales, which is what led to Balto 2 & 3—neither of which I’ll be reviewing, but I may do a Sequel Month...if that doesn’t make me seem too derivative).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LaurentLegacy7 [2018-06-26 00:59:42 +0000 UTC]
A good movie from my childhood. Balto himself is a great character who can handle himself and is willing to push past impossible.
Have you seen the Real story of Balto?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to LaurentLegacy7 [2018-06-26 02:11:36 +0000 UTC]
I did read about it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to AthhurLCK [2018-06-25 23:49:31 +0000 UTC]
I did, however I never wrote a Back From the Movies review for it. I always feel like I'm cheating my fans if I only review ONE movie.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheNightWolf38 [2018-06-25 21:15:46 +0000 UTC]
id watch this just for the fact my boi jim cummings plays the baddie
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KingZanderSanchez-i In reply to TheNightWolf38 [2018-06-25 21:17:50 +0000 UTC]
He's pretty phenomenal. Sorry if this one feels a bit disjointed and awkward; I haven't done these Animation Unknown reviews in a while so it's gonna be a bit harder to just ease back into these.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheNightWolf38 In reply to KingZanderSanchez-i [2018-06-25 21:18:39 +0000 UTC]
yeah
ik jim cummings can voice great baddies hes prooven it in sonic satam afterall lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0