HOME | DD

mattwo — Inky Pie is not even close to being Octavia

Published: 2012-01-16 05:14:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 3157; Favourites: 16; Downloads: 498
Redirect to original
Description Swear to god, are you people blind?!


DISCLAIMER

Due to the large amounts of morons who can't even read previous comments, I need to insist on the fact that you're already wrong before even thinking if you're going to disagree:


Ponies are not dogs, humans, or cats.


I'd also like to take a moment to point out the large inconsistency of the fact THAT SHE WOULD BE THE ONLY PONY THIS WOULD EVEN APPLY TO!


Really people, THINK before commenting. I will be forced to disable comments if this keeps up.

Related content
Comments: 75

mattwo In reply to ??? [2015-05-12 11:55:52 +0000 UTC]

Inky/Mince Meat/Marble didn't have one... Maud is the only one of Pinkie's sisters to have a confirmed cutie mark. I think you either have her confused with Maud or are confusing fanart for canon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Katie623DA In reply to mattwo [2015-05-12 22:07:28 +0000 UTC]

Mince Meat.......Just say Inkie Pie.

It must be fanon. Look it up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to Katie623DA [2015-05-13 14:29:17 +0000 UTC]

Well "Mince Meat" was one of the names they had considered (though Faust doesn't seem to like it either... twitter.com/Fyre_flye/status/3… ), but Marble is the only known actual canonical name, but it's of dubious canonicity at present. Also there is no fanon cutie mark for her. There's a clear difference between headcanon and fanon. One people who run those idiotic wikias need to learn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Katie623DA In reply to mattwo [2015-05-13 21:16:22 +0000 UTC]

...Huh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to Katie623DA [2015-05-14 05:16:24 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, that's not a response I can respond to. Can you please explain what's confusing you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Katie623DA In reply to mattwo [2015-07-25 14:18:55 +0000 UTC]

Everything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ReinbowDash4792 [2014-06-16 23:48:40 +0000 UTC]

I wouldn't say they look nothing alike, and I do sort of agree with MLPConcord, and I do think it's highly unlikely that they are the same person, but still, people can think that they're the same if they want to (I don't) and it hasn't been proven either way. I have points for both sides of the argument such as NOBODY has the same hairstyle throughout their entire lifetime(I used to walk around with a curly poofy mess on my head when I was, like, 5 and now I straighten it all the time.) and the obvious fact that THE NAMES ARE DIFFERENT! HELLO! But you don't need to shoot everyone down like that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Barry-Rose [2014-03-15 20:36:10 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LizzysMind [2014-01-17 09:56:52 +0000 UTC]

Well sometimes ponies change with age. When I was born my hair was Pitch black and I had blue eyes, now I have brown hair and eyes. Most kittens and puppies are born with a different appearance than there adult form, like all kittens have blue eyes and Dalmatian pups are born spotless.

But that's just my opinion. People have the right to there own opinions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

hzddztzr In reply to LizzysMind [2016-04-12 21:27:31 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LizzysMind In reply to hzddztzr [2016-04-17 08:26:27 +0000 UTC]

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mattwo In reply to LizzysMind [2014-01-17 10:35:13 +0000 UTC]

It's not an opinion. It's wrong. Their eye colors are incredibly similar. Besides, they're ponies, not dogs, humans, or cats.


I'd also like to take a moment to point out the large inconsistency of the fact THAT SHE WOULD BE THE ONLY PONY THIS WOULD EVEN APPLY TO!


Really people, THINK before commenting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SchwarzerRitter [2013-12-15 17:51:47 +0000 UTC]

Hair colour can change over time.
My hair was brown and now it is black.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to SchwarzerRitter [2013-12-16 05:33:56 +0000 UTC]

That seems unlikely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SchwarzerRitter In reply to mattwo [2013-12-16 15:13:00 +0000 UTC]

Just look at your own childhood photos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TaquitoQueen [2013-07-04 04:54:20 +0000 UTC]

im so happy you made this it drives me crazy when people think inky is Octavia !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

loyalartist [2013-06-25 23:53:47 +0000 UTC]

well I guess ponies grow and change a little, kind of like horse. when their younger they tend to be darker but become lighter when they grow. But yes I know Octavia probably isn't pinkies sister and I mean shes got a british accent

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SchwarzerRitter In reply to loyalartist [2013-12-15 17:52:19 +0000 UTC]

She could have faked the accent to hide her rock farm past.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mattwo In reply to loyalartist [2013-06-26 02:56:56 +0000 UTC]

This is Pinkie as a filly: [link]

This is Pinkie as a mare: [link]

This is Twilight as a filly: [link]

This is Twilight as a mare: [link]

This is Rainbow Dash as a filly: [link]

And RD as a mare: [link]

I hereby rest my case.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

loyalartist In reply to mattwo [2013-06-26 22:11:13 +0000 UTC]

well I guess your right, and if inky was Octavia then I wouldent be able to ship her with brae burn

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to loyalartist [2013-06-27 02:55:21 +0000 UTC]

No idea why that'd be stopping you but really I don't even care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FishyCrea [2013-01-10 23:39:53 +0000 UTC]

Well, Pinkie's mane is different from when she was a filly. The eyes aren't THAT different, but I can see the difference.
The body color is diffrent as well, I agree with you on that.
As far as her name, she could have gotten it changed. That's a thing in Equestia, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to FishyCrea [2013-01-11 07:50:34 +0000 UTC]

Coat. Color.

Explain that.

Inkie wasn't born discorded or anything, so why would her coat color magically change?

Even if there is magic in that universe, there's still a rhyme and reason to it. Case in point:

You're not scientifically possible!

There's more than enough evidence to support the idea that in Equestria science and magic are more or less one in the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FishyCrea In reply to mattwo [2013-01-11 15:09:13 +0000 UTC]

Right, your point is valid, but with one of my points, I took it from a non-canon point of view. They both ony really appeared in one episoade. That said, consistentsy is rather difficult with keeping the mane color and eye color exactly the same. Now, I never agreed or disagreed with the fact that Inky and Octavia are not th same ponies, I actually, more or less, agree. I was just bringing up some flaws in the argument presented.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to FishyCrea [2013-01-11 18:51:43 +0000 UTC]

While I am well aware the animators are prone to making color mistakes (I.e. Apple Fritter's yellow haired counterpart who apparently is now a different pony), however I don't think they ever do that with one-off characters.

Additionally I am 99.99% certain the inconsistencies only apply to manes, cutie marks, freckles and wings. NEVER coat color.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dawnsknight [2012-12-22 13:58:00 +0000 UTC]

yeah, "Octavia Pie"?
Doesn't fit the general naming scheme of the show...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Nettleheart In reply to Dawnsknight [2013-01-26 22:05:58 +0000 UTC]

Maybe 'Inky Pie' was just a nickname.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dawnsknight In reply to Nettleheart [2013-01-27 03:30:21 +0000 UTC]

'Inky Pie' is not an official name, but she's not Octavia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mattwo In reply to Dawnsknight [2012-12-22 14:01:15 +0000 UTC]

She's already confirmed to be a separate pony by the name being canon alone.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dawnsknight In reply to mattwo [2012-12-22 16:38:37 +0000 UTC]

yeah, I figured as much.
I was just really surprised by the sheer amount of people who say that she "is", you know?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to Dawnsknight [2012-12-22 18:05:51 +0000 UTC]

On a side note, it was not her in "Nightmare Night": [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jaygryphon [2012-10-02 13:36:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sir-Tristan [2012-08-03 01:12:34 +0000 UTC]

They seem to have differently shaped eyes, as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrawingGirl4 [2012-07-17 03:09:08 +0000 UTC]

I KNEW IT

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to DrawingGirl4 [2012-07-17 04:20:03 +0000 UTC]

People still look at this? ._.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alyssahdawdy In reply to mattwo [2012-11-05 14:23:09 +0000 UTC]

yes .-.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LittleSnowyOwl [2012-04-06 23:03:37 +0000 UTC]

Look at the two Lunas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to LittleSnowyOwl [2012-04-07 01:46:01 +0000 UTC]

What?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LittleSnowyOwl In reply to mattwo [2012-04-07 23:45:26 +0000 UTC]

They are enormously different.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to LittleSnowyOwl [2012-04-08 01:37:46 +0000 UTC]

No... What Lunas?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LittleSnowyOwl In reply to mattwo [2012-04-09 16:06:54 +0000 UTC]

Luna from season 1 and Luna from season 2.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to LittleSnowyOwl [2012-04-09 17:09:25 +0000 UTC]

errr how is that relevant to this image?

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

hzddztzr In reply to mattwo [2013-01-03 13:33:35 +0000 UTC]

I don't like this guy xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to hzddztzr [2013-01-04 03:05:32 +0000 UTC]

Me? Why?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

hzddztzr In reply to mattwo [2016-03-24 21:48:34 +0000 UTC]

You know why

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to hzddztzr [2016-03-25 21:58:16 +0000 UTC]

Nope. I don't even know you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FishyCrea In reply to mattwo [2013-01-10 23:41:39 +0000 UTC]

Basicly, he was trying to make the point that characters that make a quick apprience for one episoade, and return in another won't be too consistent. Inky made one apprience, if I'm not mistaking, same with Octavia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to FishyCrea [2013-01-11 07:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Where did you get that idea from?

It's not even a valid point.

Them only appearing once makes it remain pure conjecture as there'd still no solid proof. The fact the sisters didn't appear in Trixie's flashback makes it remain this way for the time being.

This comparison is the only evidence we have, and the coat color is more than enough to disprove the connection.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FishyCrea In reply to mattwo [2013-01-11 15:11:59 +0000 UTC]

The area I got the 'only in one episoade' thing from was that if they attempted to make a filly version of Octavia, consistency may have been off, so the coat and eye color may have been slightly off. Also, I would just like to say I agree with the fact that they may not be the same person, I was just bringing up a few flaws I saw in the argument.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mattwo In reply to FishyCrea [2013-01-11 18:48:42 +0000 UTC]

It's not a flaw in the argument if there's no solid proof to back it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>