HOME | DD

MichaelFaber — The Time Machine

Published: 2007-04-04 23:41:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 9555; Favourites: 223; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Made with Apophysis. Colour adjustments in PSCS2
Related content
Comments: 99

Grin-agog [2008-12-01 20:58:30 +0000 UTC]

hey Michael, would I be wrong in thinking that this could be possible with recent Apo?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Grin-agog [2008-12-02 02:57:47 +0000 UTC]

i think you proved it already

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Grin-agog In reply to MichaelFaber [2008-12-02 22:27:53 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, hmm well sort of!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Terminate421 [2008-08-30 02:42:51 +0000 UTC]

Now, I have a headache, I don't know why, great pic but, why the headache?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Terminate421 [2008-08-30 19:23:37 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anjaleck [2008-03-23 07:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Hi,

I would like to let you know I am featuring your incredible art in my weekly feature journal. [link]

Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LyinRyan [2007-11-13 18:23:16 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely awesome! I'm blown away!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MetarsusDemented [2007-11-10 19:16:51 +0000 UTC]

I am reminded of the 'time vortex' of Doctor Who.

Excellent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fusionmoth [2007-10-13 05:57:29 +0000 UTC]

wow this is amazing...+fav for me. I love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mehrdadart [2007-10-09 11:33:49 +0000 UTC]

Very very great!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shortbus990 [2007-10-06 21:47:54 +0000 UTC]

very awsome job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Quellist [2007-10-01 19:00:42 +0000 UTC]

I just have to ask: to get your flames looking so solid, do you concentrate mainly on the weights of the transforms, or the coloring? I only ask because I manipulate the coloring as well as the weights in my flames. I find that certain gradients actually improve the solidity of a flame in spots where weight-manipulation couldn't quite fix the problem.

Thanks in advance, and this flame looks killer by the way.

Q-always

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Quellist [2007-10-02 03:43:03 +0000 UTC]

i would say that weights are more important than colouring in my fractals. The full 'solid' look is from all areas of the image having approximately equal amounts of points transformed there there, and nothing overlapping. Correctly setting the weights will get this to happen - if you have set up the transforms correctly as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Quellist In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-10-02 06:36:44 +0000 UTC]

My thoughts exactly.... figures, I don't have the patience for intricate work like yours

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Meckie [2007-09-24 19:43:18 +0000 UTC]

Arrrw, gotta lot of way to travel 'til I reach this ! I'll make it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RV-TIDE [2007-09-19 20:20:14 +0000 UTC]

This sort of fractal makes people want to experiment. Great work. Superb.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to RV-TIDE [2007-09-20 00:24:14 +0000 UTC]

make sure you grab the latest plugin pack [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RV-TIDE In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-09-20 20:46:58 +0000 UTC]

I did

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zooreka [2007-08-31 15:23:26 +0000 UTC]

Incredible Piece!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

7he1ndigo [2007-08-07 05:24:15 +0000 UTC]

sweet pic, particularly symmetry

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyberxaos [2007-08-05 03:56:29 +0000 UTC]

Don't know how I missed ing this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

erene [2007-08-03 08:18:18 +0000 UTC]

I am a first time viewer and your work is amazing. This is my favourite so far!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to erene [2007-08-04 01:12:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

erene In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-08-04 04:25:14 +0000 UTC]

The pleasure is all mine, you deserve it!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Energetic-Innovation [2007-08-01 23:32:35 +0000 UTC]

Freaking awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kdietrich [2007-06-01 20:23:05 +0000 UTC]

This is a really amazing image -- I love everything about it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to kdietrich [2007-06-04 06:44:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

psion005 [2007-05-17 16:36:34 +0000 UTC]

Not sure how i missed this but it has to be one of the best flames i have seen ... lotsa complex stuff going on in there dude *respect*

Me---->

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to psion005 [2007-05-17 23:43:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Andrew!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zsteve [2007-05-08 01:25:15 +0000 UTC]

What splendid detail and design. Colours are great. You should sell this architectural design for someone to build!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to zsteve [2007-05-09 04:55:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comments!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

milleniumsentry [2007-05-03 21:10:04 +0000 UTC]

My theory.. Apophysis is up to version 10, and you are keeping it a huge secret.

This is absolutely incredible... my brain actually hurts trying to think of how it was done.

Made my wishlist, made my favorites, made my day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to milleniumsentry [2007-05-04 01:22:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the comment! There is actually some devious stuff in here that isn't in the public Apophysis

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

milleniumsentry In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-05-04 03:58:49 +0000 UTC]

*squints* aayyye knnneeeeew it.

*snicker*

This one seriously blew me away.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NicoleFaber [2007-04-24 06:12:54 +0000 UTC]

Joel was showing me something about a guy and his art work.. This looks like it.. I don't know who the dude is.. You'll have to ask him!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to NicoleFaber [2007-04-24 22:44:57 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NicoleFaber In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-04-25 06:27:05 +0000 UTC]

I asked Joel.... Him.... [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PatGoltz [2007-04-23 06:04:01 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm. My worlds got mixed up. I feel discombobulated!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kaeltyk [2007-04-13 12:28:12 +0000 UTC]

'Only' apophysis ? Wow... I still have so much to discover from it... and happy for that
Very nice flame !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Kaeltyk [2007-04-14 05:16:10 +0000 UTC]

+ PS for colours

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FiberFiend [2007-04-13 02:22:34 +0000 UTC]

Wowww....how do you get it soooo sharp like that? It looks completely un-Apo-ish.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to FiberFiend [2007-04-14 05:17:53 +0000 UTC]

It's clean and sharp because none of the transforms transform to the same place - nothing overlaps.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RyJek [2007-04-12 09:02:40 +0000 UTC]

Man, this is so unbelivable...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

trystianity [2007-04-12 01:33:02 +0000 UTC]

zomg I haet u n ur skilz 2

sorry...

Very hypnotic. The title is fitting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to trystianity [2007-04-12 09:05:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks muchly Trystian!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

avaunt [2007-04-10 05:44:47 +0000 UTC]

<<
I hate you and your skillz.






)=

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nestalgica [2007-04-09 21:38:55 +0000 UTC]

You sure can keep track of all of your triangles. Very nice! It's got a very 3D feel to it

Are you sure you're not using 3D Max?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MichaelFaber In reply to Nestalgica [2007-04-10 01:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, man! No 3D software

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nestalgica In reply to MichaelFaber [2007-04-10 01:46:24 +0000 UTC]

If you say so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rykk [2007-04-09 02:59:13 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely awesome flame! A year ago who would have thought APo could do something like this...in the right hands, of course!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>