HOME | DD

nanwe01 β€” Italian Confederation today

Published: 2013-09-20 11:24:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 18127; Favourites: 128; Downloads: 248
Redirect to original
Description Map in modern style of the map I did for the MotM 1, without Albania, however.

As for the flags, I did not make them, so credit for them goes to Wikipedia users F l a n k e r, Owenblacker Myriam Thyes and Klone123.

Languages used besides Italian are Franco-provenΓ§al, Ligurian, Sardinian, Emilano-Romagnol, Piedmontese and Lombard (Kingdom of Northern Italy), Venetian and Friulian (Venetian Republic), Friulian (Triestine Republic), Emiliano-Romagnol (Roman Republic), Neapolitan (Kingdom of Naples) and Sicilian (Sicilian Kingdom).

Plans for a map of the sub-national territorial units (already shown but not named in this map) and a political map exist in my head, but I don't if and when I'll do it.

- Changes from first version: Added Trentino (not sure if I actually like it, I might revert to old border) and added Albania.
Related content
Comments: 55

rovitosa [2018-01-09 22:49:51 +0000 UTC]

Can I ask how you realized this stunning map? Did you use a particular computer program?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to rovitosa [2018-01-10 12:17:58 +0000 UTC]

Hi! Yeah, of course. It was made with Inkscape, a vector design software programme.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rovitosa In reply to nanwe01 [2018-01-10 14:59:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BadgingBadger [2016-10-28 00:45:19 +0000 UTC]

1. Does this Italy have any colonies?
2. How different from OTL was TTL's german unification?
3. Also, what happened to San Marino?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to BadgingBadger [2016-11-05 16:50:52 +0000 UTC]

1. Not anymore.
2. No idea, I didn't really plan much, plus the map is pretty old, I imagine it got unified in 1848.
3. It was absorbed into the Italian Confederation as TTL it didn't host Garibaldi.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BadgingBadger In reply to nanwe01 [2016-11-09 23:36:59 +0000 UTC]

How different were TTL's Crimean War and American Civil War?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Allamistakeo [2016-09-17 06:29:23 +0000 UTC]

Awesome, but Trentino is not Veneto! (Or better, nowadays it is extremely venetising but considering this a post WWII conformation at that time the identity was still very strong. In fact, that was when its autonomous constitution was written)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Allamistakeo [2016-09-19 07:10:48 +0000 UTC]

I know, but my map does not deal with modern identities, nor it's really about the language or identity borders as they are now, but just once with a PoD from the 19th century, so rather different.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Impllied [2016-09-15 19:27:59 +0000 UTC]

Still working on this? I've some suggestions in case you ever decide to make a v3, or whatnot (that political map floating around in your head?).

Regardless, you do some great work - both of your Italian maps, & your All-Indian Union map in particular.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Impllied [2016-09-25 13:41:51 +0000 UTC]

For the time being, there won't be a 3rd version, but I'm working on a map that focuses on northern Italy. Tentatively calling it "La Lega di Cristo Re" And to be honest, it's been a very long time since I made this map.Β 

Thanks for the kind words

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bubrezi [2016-01-12 12:23:21 +0000 UTC]

Very good!
I have a question:Β Why did you leave Roman speaking Corsica out of Italian Federation?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to bubrezi [2016-01-12 21:05:02 +0000 UTC]

Because it's not realistic that Italy could have defeated France, even if it had been wealthier. Although Corsicans speak Corsican, not Roman. And well, the French also speak a Romance language

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

bubrezi In reply to nanwe01 [2016-01-13 14:11:46 +0000 UTC]

In this map of yours, Italy already has Savoia and Nizza which are French speaking areas in real world, in other words French departments of Savoie, Haute Savoie and Alpes Maritimes.

Italy has already taken Gallo-Romance speaking Savoia and Nizza and has not gone to war with France over them? How come?
But taking Italic-Romance Corsica would lead to war?

The reason you've given is not realistic.
I think that Corsica would definitely join Italy. Especially when Slavic Trieste and Albania did, and given the fact that Italy in your map already took French territories on its west.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to bubrezi [2016-01-13 16:23:08 +0000 UTC]

It did not. Those territories were a part of the kingdom of Sardinia until the 1850s, when they were exchanged for French support in conquering Lombardy from the Austrians. As that did not happen TTL, those territories remain Italian. It's perfectly realistic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bubrezi In reply to nanwe01 [2016-01-14 10:32:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, I see the point now.
But...
If there was no was between France and Italy and predecessor states, then especially Corsica should have joined Italy.

Corsica was part of Republic of Genoa (before that Aragon), and Genoa merged with Kingdom of Savoy (Sardinia).
If there was no war, why would Republic of Genoa cast off its territory just like that?
I don't see why would some entity i.e. Genoa do something like: Yes, we want to merge, but we'll give away Corsica to someone else for, well no reason, because there's no war.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to bubrezi [2016-01-15 10:41:33 +0000 UTC]

Because the point of divergence was in 1848, not in the 18th century, that means that everything until 1848 remains the same, and by that time Corsica had been French for almost a century. France ambitioned Savoy (and to a lesser degree Nice) but what mattered more was a friendly Italy, which they'll get, and obviously neither party wants to embark on a potentially dangerous path of being at odds, when both face much bigger opponents with territorial ambitions, i.e. the Germans.

I'm not being capricious, if you look at my deviantart, you'll see the original map on which this is created, which explores the creation of the Italian Confederation as a conflict. Here it is :Β nanwe01.deviantart.com/art/Mot…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bubrezi In reply to nanwe01 [2016-01-15 12:44:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the explanation, it makes sense to me now.Β 
I didn't realize the divergence point from the map's description.
Sorry for the hassle.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to bubrezi [2016-01-15 13:41:42 +0000 UTC]

No worries! It's nice to have people ask questions.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bubrezi In reply to nanwe01 [2016-01-13 14:02:31 +0000 UTC]

You're right, Romance is what I should have written for Corsican.
What I meant is that Corsican is linguistically closer to Italian than to French.

It isΒ IndoEuropean-Italic-Romance
ItaloDalmatian-ItalianTuscan-Corsican
while French is in other branch of Romance languages
IndoEuropean-Italic-Romance
WesternRomance-GalloRomance-Oil-French

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

grisador [2015-11-18 22:49:22 +0000 UTC]

Awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Al3ssio97 [2015-09-03 07:16:43 +0000 UTC]

Even in OTL the Pope Pio XI have propose a doganal and a monetary union between the Italian States.

it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lega_d…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Al3ssio97 [2015-09-03 13:53:15 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but it was a very different kind of federalism from which most Italian liberals and radicals from 1848 wanted, one which strengthened the role of the princes and absolutism in Italy. Which is why this proposal was essentially 'paper mojado' as we'd say in Spain (empty talk basically) meant by a Pope that initialy seemed reformist but the second his political -not religious- authority was questioned by the Roman Republic of OTL turned ultramontane.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Al3ssio97 In reply to nanwe01 [2015-09-03 20:06:52 +0000 UTC]

Well yes, i think if fhe cardinal who have this idea was not assassinated now italy was very different. The Roman Republic was a good example for a democracy in Italy, and for a democratic kingdom the Kingdom of Sardinia.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Shirakou1 [2015-05-03 17:59:43 +0000 UTC]

Is it modeled after the German Confederation?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Al3ssio97 In reply to Shirakou1 [2015-08-15 20:48:35 +0000 UTC]

I think yes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

IEPH [2014-08-02 15:27:20 +0000 UTC]

Loving this Nanwe.

One thought: could you add the following languages there too. . .

-Slovenian, Croatian and Istriot (for theΒ Triestine Republic)
-Albanian (for Albania)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to IEPH [2014-08-06 19:59:48 +0000 UTC]

Well the map is finished, so no, I won' add any other, especially as both Albanian and the Slavic languages are associated with un-Italianess and reactionary ideologies and therefore are not well treated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tardis218 [2014-07-12 02:15:27 +0000 UTC]

do you make the Β provinces by your self or do you get a map with the provinces already?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Tardis218 [2014-07-15 12:26:40 +0000 UTC]

I found the provinces' maps or close enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

YOhuan15 [2014-02-07 12:49:07 +0000 UTC]

Molto bella! PerΓ², se mi posso permettere, Bologna e la Romagna (e sopratutto Ferrara) non li vedo bene ai giorni nostri sotto la repubblica Romana, andrebbero sicuramente assieme al resto dell'Emilia nell'Italia Settentrionale.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sturm94 [2013-10-15 16:39:05 +0000 UTC]

It's a fictional Italy federation of which year?


You made a brave choice, it's very hard understand the italian lenguage, dialects are almost impossible, expecially sicilian and sardinian dialects... But you made it very good.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Sturm94 [2013-10-16 08:30:57 +0000 UTC]

Today So 2013.


As a Spaniard, Italian is really easy to understand, so I don't think it's hard, but of course, that opinion might not be shared by speakers of non-Romance languages


I don't speak the dialects, of course, and to be honest I have no idea how you'd pronounce most of the stuff in dialect, however, the written part was taken from their wikis, which made the whole thing easier. My hardest time was finding the names in Friulian, which apparently is not an actual dialect, but a language much closer to Ladin ad Romansh.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Fapor [2013-10-15 09:46:55 +0000 UTC]

Another good map!

I am surprised especially as you have translated the names of the cities in their regional dialects.Β 

Apart from the patience to search for each name, it seems to me a very nice touch that gives more the idea of ​​a "confederal" Β Italy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to Fapor [2013-10-15 15:17:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!


Actually it wasn't that difficult, most of the dialects/languages have their own wiki pages so it made my life easier.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mdc01957 [2013-09-25 16:35:08 +0000 UTC]

This is very well done!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to mdc01957 [2013-09-25 21:07:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mdc01957 In reply to nanwe01 [2013-09-25 23:19:14 +0000 UTC]

Any time!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ChR1sAlbo [2013-09-25 15:35:40 +0000 UTC]

When Albania was under Italian rule it had more territories than what you have shown on this map. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map… Β  Anyway, very nice work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

nanwe01 In reply to ChR1sAlbo [2013-09-25 21:10:06 +0000 UTC]

Actually since you are Albanian yourself, I have a question. Are there any other heraldric symbols of Albania besides the double-headed eagle? Because I have been searching for them to no avail. My idea was to Italianize Albania so idk if it'd be a good idea to use an Albanian national symbol.


So, I reiterate my question about whether or not there are other heraldric symbols for Albania as a community.


Any help is really appreciated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ChR1sAlbo In reply to nanwe01 [2013-09-26 10:17:21 +0000 UTC]

Yes there are, you can find some in my gallery.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nanwe01 In reply to ChR1sAlbo [2013-09-25 21:07:07 +0000 UTC]

While I do know that, keep in mind that this is not actual history, but rather alternative history (uchronie). Anyway, thanks for the compliments!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FollowByWhiteRabbit [2013-09-23 06:45:03 +0000 UTC]

Cool !! Could You post CoA only ??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to FollowByWhiteRabbit [2013-09-23 08:15:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Yeah, I will.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to nanwe01 [2013-09-23 11:25:16 +0000 UTC]

Here you go:Β fav.me/d6ni52r

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

KlausVonKueste [2013-09-20 17:17:20 +0000 UTC]

Why Veneto have lost Rovigo province, and half province of Verona? There land was Always been Venetians!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to KlausVonKueste [2013-09-20 17:29:41 +0000 UTC]

Indeed they have. But as I believe I told you in the other map it's a result of the desire by the Savoyards to take the Quadrilatero from the Austrians between 1848 and 1853, and they did not care what the Venetians felt, as a strategic reasons trumped that.


Anyway, the lands have continued to be Lombard, despite the Venetian Republic's many complaints, largely because the Savoyard Kingdom now fear losing access to the Adriatic.



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

KlausVonKueste In reply to nanwe01 [2013-09-20 18:31:25 +0000 UTC]

Ok, very thanks! I haven't read the answer on other map!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

elparasito [2013-09-20 12:29:57 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nanwe01 In reply to elparasito [2013-09-20 12:54:14 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean? To the groups? Well I simply press "+ Add to a group" and I add it to the groups to which I contribute.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SoaringAven [2013-09-20 11:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Cool

Will you add Albania in another window?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>