HOME | DD

#dinosaurs #dryosaurus #orodromeus #nanosaurus #sizecomparison
Published: 2019-10-09 20:19:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 6100; Favourites: 126; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
AttentionThe specimen this was based on is most likely not a dryosaurus.
Papers that have reviewed the material since the original description point to it being closer related to Camptosaurus.
Given the specimen is:
A. not fully grown
B. has a proportionately longer tibia than adult Camptosaurus
C. in possession of a nearly identically shaped ilium to campto
It's a reasonable assumption that it was a juvenile Camptosaur.
Until further edited disregard the scale chart.
On a positive note, all known dryosaurus specimens are not skeletaly mature. (so dryo, while likely not as large is still pretty large)
=====
Dryosaurus (green), Nanosaurus (yellow) and Orodromeus (cream), Wild Turkey (black) and Blue jay (obvious).
Dryosaurus altus based on 's D. elderae skeletal
www.deviantart.com/getawaytrik…
Orodromeus based on 's orodromeus skeletal
www.skeletaldrawing.com/ornith…
everything used to reconstruct Nanosaurus can be found here:
www.researchgate.net/figure/Na…
Human Silhouettes and modern animals made from images found on pixabay (royalty free)
pixabay.com/
Related content
Comments: 28
Lediblock2 [2019-11-17 05:30:17 +0000 UTC]
Kinda ironic that the fossil you based this on is Nanosaurus again considering how fucking big it was compared to others of its kind, huh?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Lediblock2 [2019-11-17 16:46:49 +0000 UTC]
The nanosaurus paper refers to it as camptosaurus like
and it never states the specimen as a nanosaurus.
so I have no idea where you got that from.
said fossil being
CM 1949
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lediblock2 In reply to Paleop [2019-11-21 03:13:45 +0000 UTC]
I was making a joke, dude. Apologies if I fucked it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Lediblock2 [2019-11-21 03:42:57 +0000 UTC]
I didn't get the joke
though I can see it's a reference to the paper
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AndreOF-Gallery [2019-11-07 14:22:55 +0000 UTC]
Was CM 1949 the specimen you based the Dryosaurus on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-11-08 04:50:48 +0000 UTC]
the composite it was based on was based off of that specimen yes.
which is no longer dryo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Paleop [2019-11-08 11:20:22 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I saw the reassessment in the "Nanosaurus is back" paper
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YellowPanda2001 [2019-11-07 09:00:22 +0000 UTC]
lol, Dryosaurus is a junior synonym of Camptosaurus...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2019-11-07 04:45:36 +0000 UTC]
no
===
thank you for pointign that out
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Atlantis536 [2019-10-28 06:30:51 +0000 UTC]
From the thumbnail I thought the horse has a really long tail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RandomPaleonerd [2019-10-22 00:46:02 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Roxafox [2019-10-12 12:37:18 +0000 UTC]
ha! I was about to google "dinosaurs the size of a horse or smaller" but then randomly saw this on the sidebar lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
superkoola [2019-10-09 22:19:09 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to superkoola [2019-10-11 16:27:32 +0000 UTC]
to be fair this size is derived from a obscure skull
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Evodolka [2019-10-09 20:28:53 +0000 UTC]
people tend to forget that (me included)
it is because it is always stood next to giant dinosaurs, so you forget just how big it is
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to Evodolka [2019-10-09 20:30:35 +0000 UTC]
This is fair
granted a lot of depictions use G.sp's altus skeletal which is a smaller animal
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evodolka In reply to Paleop [2019-10-09 23:13:52 +0000 UTC]
never heard of the guy but i will assume he found a small version everyone thinks of
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Screwyoumimus In reply to Evodolka [2019-10-11 10:09:23 +0000 UTC]
He's the other big skeletal maker. Also doesn't like people using his skeletals commercially.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Evodolka In reply to Screwyoumimus [2019-10-11 13:45:30 +0000 UTC]
ah ok then, i'll look him up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0