HOME | DD

Paleop — Outdated and incorrect

#dinosaurs #dryosaurus #orodromeus #nanosaurus #sizecomparison
Published: 2019-10-09 20:19:21 +0000 UTC; Views: 6100; Favourites: 126; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description Attention
The specimen this was based on is most likely not a dryosaurus.
Papers that have reviewed the material since the original description point to it being closer related to Camptosaurus.
Given the specimen is:
A. not fully grown
B. has a proportionately longer tibia than adult Camptosaurus
C. in possession of a nearly identically shaped ilium to campto
It's a reasonable assumption that it was a juvenile Camptosaur.
Until further edited disregard the scale chart. 
On a positive note, all known dryosaurus specimens are not skeletaly mature. (so dryo, while likely not as large is still pretty large)

=====
Dryosaurus (green), Nanosaurus (yellow) and Orodromeus (cream), Wild Turkey (black) and Blue jay (obvious). 

Dryosaurus altus based on 's D. elderae  skeletal 
www.deviantart.com/getawaytrik…

Orodromeus based on 's orodromeus skeletal
www.skeletaldrawing.com/ornith…

everything used to reconstruct Nanosaurus can be found here:
www.researchgate.net/figure/Na…

Human Silhouettes and modern animals made from images found on pixabay  (royalty free)
pixabay.com/
Related content
Comments: 28

Lediblock2 [2019-11-17 05:30:17 +0000 UTC]

Kinda ironic that the fossil you based this on is Nanosaurus again considering how fucking big it was compared to others of its kind, huh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to Lediblock2 [2019-11-17 16:46:49 +0000 UTC]

The nanosaurus paper refers to it as camptosaurus like
and it never states the specimen as a nanosaurus.
so I have no idea where you got that from.
said fossil being
CM 1949

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Paleop [2019-11-21 03:13:45 +0000 UTC]

I was making a joke, dude. Apologies if I fucked it up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to Lediblock2 [2019-11-21 03:42:57 +0000 UTC]

I didn't get the joke
though  I can see it's a reference to the paper

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AndreOF-Gallery [2019-11-07 14:22:55 +0000 UTC]

Was CM 1949 the specimen you based the Dryosaurus on?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-11-08 04:50:48 +0000 UTC]

the composite it was based on was based off of that specimen yes.
which is no longer dryo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AndreOF-Gallery In reply to Paleop [2019-11-08 11:20:22 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I saw the reassessment in the "Nanosaurus is back" paper

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2019-11-08 18:59:48 +0000 UTC]

good

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YellowPanda2001 [2019-11-07 09:00:22 +0000 UTC]

lol, Dryosaurus is a junior synonym of Camptosaurus...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-11-08 04:51:19 +0000 UTC]

no
just 1 specimen

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

YellowPanda2001 In reply to Paleop [2019-11-08 09:09:26 +0000 UTC]

i know, just kidding

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to YellowPanda2001 [2019-11-08 18:59:33 +0000 UTC]

ree

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mesozoic0906 [2019-11-07 02:06:48 +0000 UTC]


Then, does this size chart still stands?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2019-11-07 04:45:36 +0000 UTC]

no
===
thank you for pointign that out

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atlantis536 [2019-10-28 06:30:51 +0000 UTC]

From the thumbnail I thought the horse has a really long tail.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RandomPaleonerd [2019-10-22 00:46:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Roxafox [2019-10-12 12:37:18 +0000 UTC]

ha! I was about to google "dinosaurs the size of a horse or smaller" but then randomly saw this on the sidebar lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deform2018 [2019-10-10 11:11:13 +0000 UTC]

Actually, it's SMALLER than I expected.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

YellowPanda2001 [2019-10-10 09:41:10 +0000 UTC]

Duh, Dryo is huge.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

superkoola [2019-10-09 22:19:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to superkoola [2019-10-11 16:27:32 +0000 UTC]

to be fair this size is derived from a obscure skull

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Evodolka [2019-10-09 20:28:53 +0000 UTC]

people tend to forget that (me included)
it is because it is always stood next to giant dinosaurs, so you forget just how big it is

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to Evodolka [2019-10-09 20:30:35 +0000 UTC]

This is fair
granted a lot of depictions use G.sp's altus  skeletal which is a smaller animal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to Paleop [2019-10-09 21:55:22 +0000 UTC]

G.sp?
not sure what that means

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Paleop In reply to Evodolka [2019-10-09 22:42:34 +0000 UTC]

Gregory s paul

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to Paleop [2019-10-09 23:13:52 +0000 UTC]

never heard of the guy but i will assume he found a small version everyone thinks of

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Screwyoumimus In reply to Evodolka [2019-10-11 10:09:23 +0000 UTC]

He's the other big skeletal maker. Also doesn't like people using his skeletals commercially.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Evodolka In reply to Screwyoumimus [2019-10-11 13:45:30 +0000 UTC]

ah ok then, i'll look him up

👍: 0 ⏩: 0