HOME | DD

#tyrannosaurus #tyrannosaurusrex
Published: 2017-12-04 05:14:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 1525; Favourites: 51; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
I finally tried to render hair on a model. And for a first time rendering it on a model the process ain't half bad.(yes I drew the feathers onto the last feathered render)
It's far from perfect, but I'm happy with the results for now,
oh, and Rexy's been on an accuracy diet. The model when volume calculated and given a density of .92 or so gets a mass of 9.35 metric tonnes.
The model is now a lot more faithful to ' skeletal reference and boasts some improved anatomical detail.
a big thank you to for his advice!
Related content
Comments: 25
9Weegee [2017-12-04 21:28:38 +0000 UTC]
Why have feathers only in 1 small area if you could cover most of the body in short elephantine fuzz?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
9Weegee In reply to Paleop [2017-12-04 23:31:41 +0000 UTC]
Ive made models with probably more hair particles in blender than this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paleop In reply to 9Weegee [2017-12-05 00:37:07 +0000 UTC]
I have no clue how powerful your computer is, but my computer is most likely not the same model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
9Weegee In reply to 9Weegee [2017-12-04 21:29:12 +0000 UTC]
A coat like that seems pretty useless
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ijreid In reply to 9Weegee [2017-12-06 01:20:48 +0000 UTC]
Where do you wear your coats if not on the shoulders and back?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
9Weegee In reply to ijreid [2017-12-06 01:30:43 +0000 UTC]
no. why would an animal minimallize it's coat to be tiny compared to the rest of the body. If anything, it would go as far as it can get to keep other areas warm.
I think these types of tiny coats on tyrannosaurs is just downright stupid. it looks like an attempt to make as big of a coat as possible without bumping into the numerous scale impressions from tyrannosaurids.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ijreid In reply to 9Weegee [2017-12-06 15:11:38 +0000 UTC]
The "numerous" scale impressions really don't cover any of the upper half of the animal except the single on the base of the ilium, which is about halfway up the torso.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
9Weegee In reply to ijreid [2017-12-06 15:21:38 +0000 UTC]
take all of the tyrannosaurid scale impressions known, and then put them in their respective spots. there, you'll see that the likelihood of a coat of feathers is astronomically low.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ijreid In reply to 9Weegee [2017-12-08 00:02:25 +0000 UTC]
Feathers are most often on the dorsum of animals, which as yet we do not have scale impressions referrable to Tyrannosaurus from
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Paleop In reply to Kester14 [2017-12-04 18:12:20 +0000 UTC]
*tonnes
if it were us tons it would be 10.27 tons
T. rex is a pretty fricken big theropod
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mesozoic0906 [2017-12-04 07:51:09 +0000 UTC]
(Why did you put feathers on rex while covering therizinosaurus entirely with reticula..??)
Anyway, nice render
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Paleop In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2017-12-04 15:10:46 +0000 UTC]
well who said I had to be consistent
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Waldbeere In reply to Mesozoic0906 [2017-12-04 11:21:16 +0000 UTC]
He just experimented with the Therizinosaurus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Paleop In reply to alienator65 [2017-12-04 05:37:10 +0000 UTC]
sure, just don't claim it as 100% acurate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alienator65 In reply to Paleop [2017-12-04 05:41:29 +0000 UTC]
Alright. Thanks. I like the idea of rexes having little capes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0