HOME | DD
paradigm-shifting — Dilbert on Blaming Climate Change For EVERYTHING
by
#agenda #agenda21 #agenda2030 #corporation #dilbert #politics #climatechange
Published: 2019-12-14 00:59:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 1394; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
There is no doubt that dumping toxic crap into the environment isn't healthy. The social problem starts when the buzz word "Climate Change" is used to push corporate and political agendas. All you have to do when you want to make A TON OF MONEY, is use "because of climate change" in your presentation and everyone will simply just assume that you're one of the good guys, simply just because you said you are and used the right buzzwords in the right way in front of extremely dumbed down and hypnotized people.It truly is that simple.
Related content
Comments: 50
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dilbert, unlike most comic characters, is intelligent. He works for a company run by idiots tho.
Dagwood Bumstead, an idiot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Very true.
Everybody agrees that climate changes in some ways over a long enough time period.
There is, however, no scientific consensus about:
1) How much mankind effects global temperatures vs that of change that happens naturally
2) What the "correct climate" would be where no other changes should be allowed
3) Whether or not "solutions" such as the green new deal would be worth the resulting sacrifice in human lives and prosperity
When enviro-wackos talk about a "consensus", they're talking about practically nothing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Indeed. They also act as if there is no consensus about the idea that poisoning ourselves is bad. Yes, lets have clear air, clean water and soil that isn't laced with toxic chemicals. This is a no-brainer. There is also plenty that can be done about these things which do not require drastic measures. However none of this has to do with the climate. It just has to do with the idea that taking poisons into our bodies is not the smartest idea in the world.
People also do not realize that pollution (regardless of what type of pollution) is not some inevitable result of industrialization and technology. Pollution is created ON PURPOSE by large corporations which profit from doing so. This is also why alternative fuel sources (which have been around for over 100 years by the way) are blocked by big corporations.
For Cars:
Water Powered Engine
Compressed Air Powered Engine
Magnetic Engine
High Efficiency Biofuel Engines (about 150mpg)
For Homes:
Wood Burning Furnace (you'd be surprised how environmentally friendly, clean and efficient these can be)
Wind Power (small vertical turbines)
Solar Power (works even in overcast!)
Thermal-Electric (hot water from wood burning furnace can create energy)
Heat Pump
Gasifier
Geothermal
All of the ones listed for cars
For Municipal Use
Ocean Current Energy
Tidal Energy
Hydroelectric Energy
All of the others listed for homes and cars
There are also many other forms I could mention, but I digress.
The point is, oil has been obsolete for a very long time -- but to make people think we're dependent upon it is a huge part of the power base (no pun intended) that keeps humanity enslaved. It is an excuse for political agendas, wars and all kinds of other things that a parasitic ruling class of criminals use to exploit us, because we are their chattle. Their property. And we just don't know it.
This is also another reason they want to heavily censor the Internet. More and more people keep creating "how to videos" for how to setup alternative means of power in your home.
The cool thing about a Gasifier, is that it allows you to take smoke exhaust and use it to power what would otherwise have been a gas powered electrical generator. So you could take the exhaust from a wood burning furnace, stove or fire place, and run it through a gasifier to fuel a gas powered generator, which could then be used to charge a battery array.
The exhaust comes out extremely clean. I'd imagine from there you could take the exhaust pipe, send it down to the bottom of an algae pond sitting in the center of a green house and the end resulting product of the whole system would be oxygen.
What would be extremely cool, is just like how the Internet is moving more towards a fully decentralized structure, to have a similar sort of thing with a Community Power Grid.
Each house would have it's own power sources (see previous list of possibilities) that charges the battery array for that house. But then each battery array for each house would then act as it's own large battery, which would then be wired to all of the other homes in the areas as well. This way, all of the homes in an area are all keeping each others batteries charged.
The local community would provide it's own power to itself, no electric company needed. It could even provide power for all of the light posts in the area.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks. It is up to us as individuals to take this knowledge and do whatever we can with it. The powers who assume they be, are not going to help us with any of it. They do the polar opposite of helping.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Basically they went from global cooling to warming and finally to simple change
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
It's an excuse for fancy vacations
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
While ignoring places like Jamaica which are literally run by criminals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Progressive hypocrisy is something I could never understand.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Also of course as we all knew would happen, the government finally admits to chemtrails now. Wanna take a wild guess what their excuse for them is?
"well uhhh it is to help combat global warming der der der duh duh duh!"
Yeah, because polluting the air for decades with aluminum nano particulates (which are deadly to all life) is going to "save life" ... because, this makes ... so much sense?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"...the government finally admits to chemtrails now..."
When did that happen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A fair question!
Chemtrails aka Geoengineering aka Stratospheric Aresol Injection, is being discussed and admitted to in this MSM clip of CIA Director John Brennan. He explains this as a "technology" that could "potentially reverse the warming effects of climate change".
Seeing as this video covers multiple topics, I've given you a link that takes you to the exact time stamp just slightly before he begins talking, so that you don't have to hunt for it or wade through anything you might not be interested in.
youtu.be/QEI3ZyHLVT8?t=260
Also to note, I'm giving you this because you asked and it was a fair question. I've seen too many instances where showing people hard evidence of something still just bounces off their head, so I know better than to try to convince anyone of anything. I'd also like to note that I'm not presenting this video as evidence of geoengineering itself, but evidence that someone in government admitted to it's existence, and gave global warming as a justification for doing it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
They travel to cancun on private jets or yachts yet we're supposed to believe them when the nasa photos show the ice caps growing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Plus, the Earth has been through super volcanoes, asteroid and comet impacts and other cataclysms, and life is still here.
People need to learn the difference between "humanity is in danger of wiping ITSELF out" and "omg save the Earth!".
The Earth will be fine. The only thing we have that MIGHT totally fuck it, would be a full scale nuclear war. Which is unlikely to happen. So barring that unlikely event, there isn't anything we can do to "hurt the Earth". Hurt ourselves? Absolutely. Dumping toxic shit all over the place and then expecting the human body to not suffer any consequences is idiotic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I've looked into that stuff too and as far as anyone can tell, not very many nukes were set off back in those days. Today, we have something like 50,000 nuclear weapons and if we let them all fire off, there would be nothing left on the surface to recover. There is also the possibility that with excessive nuclear weapons detonating at once, that this could potentially add so much pressure to the plate tectonics that the entire surface of the Earth becomes covered in magma, and the oceans boil off. At that point, it might take another billion years to even see microscopic life develop here again.
Everything has a limit to how much of a beating it can take.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There is no evidence of such a flaw, and besides that is a luciferian belief system about humanity. It is part of how they are able to justify the things they do. Of course they want us to have that exact same belief system. If we just look at basic brain science, the core operating system has only one basic function -- to survive through adaptation to the environment. No bias towards good or evil, but with such a lack of bias comes an equal potential for both. This means that if an environment is malevolent, then adapting to that environment requires emulating that environment in order to survive. If an environment is benevolent, the adapting to that environment also requires emulating that environment in order to survive. This is why people who were lucky enough / unlucky enough (depending on your own point of view on it) to have grown up in a completely benevolent environment, have a complete lack of ability to survive in the rest of a world that is otherwise a malevolent environment. We refer to this as someone being "sheltered". As for most of the world being a malevolent environment, this is why even people who are otherwise basically good people, are able to easily be programmed with beliefs and habits that are psychopathic, without technically being psychopaths themselves. For example, everything which allows for psychopaths to rule over us that we are taught is normal and rational and just the way life needs to be lived, are psychopathic behaviors that we are able to acclimate to and accept as normal, but without any requirement for any of us to actually be psychopaths ourselves.
One must understand that in order for free will to truly exist, there needs to be the potential for both good and evil. If there was only the potential for good but not evil, then we would basically be non-sentient programmed robots with no soul, and no will. We would be inanimate objects with no more life than the chair you're sitting in. So what you call a flaw, isn't a flaw. It is what allows for sentient conscious life to actually exist and experience reality.
If humanity on this planet ends up as a failed species, it will be because we failed. It will not be because there was some flaw preventing us from succeeding. To even mention the concept of failure would be entirely irrelevant if there was no possibility for success.
I'm the type of person who clings to life, so I have to believe that a better world will result from all of the current nonsense, even if I happen to be wrong and humanity is actually completely screwed. Because if I were to choose to believe that humanity is screwed, then my only opinion would be to kill myself because what then would be the point in remaining alive? So seeing as killing myself is not really a desirable opinion for me, I have to believe in a better world, even if I'm only fooling myself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think you're processing this in terms of absolute extremes. Most people do that, so I'm not faulting you for anything. But it does make conversation with most people difficult.
I am not claiming humans are born perfect with no flaws. You suggested some ultimate uber-flaw which makes evolution impossible and damns humanity into a state from which there is no escape, ever. That is a Luciferian belief.
I'm not really sure how to respond to you with most of this because you're speaking in extreme left / right absolutist extreme swings. Like suddenly you are trying to directly compare humans and deer when it is a logical fallacy to do so. Deer do not have the advanced frontal lobe that allows for free will choice. So a deer can't ever experience indoctrination as a form of environment. Where as humans can create their own environments, both externally and subjectively. Whatever you teach a child, even if the teachings are not physical, not provable and are merely bullshit stories -- that child's brain will adapt for survival in that environment by conforming to it. So if those beliefs are that all (insert skin color here) are bad and evil, or (insert psychopathic corporate societal behavior pattern) is the only way to be and the only way to live, etc, etc, etc and so on and that failure to conform to this thought policing will result in mommy and daddy won't love you anymore and God will send you to hell to burn for all eternity, well -- these things are forms of environment. The child will automatically believe whatever they are told. Will automatically look outward from themselves and attempt to physically copy everything others around them are doing. The brain has no judgement about whether or not anything about this environment is truly good or evil, it merely blindly accepts the program because it is a tiny little weak helpless child that can literally be killed by even the slightest thing in its external environment, and will automatically look to perceived authority for protection from harm. When you create a society that continues to act like this and which turns adulthood into a state of extended adolescence -- then you have exactly the society we have. Deer are not capable of any of this. Deer can not conceive of indoctrination. They have no concept of future. They can not be threatened with the idea of potential future harm. They can not be brain washed into believing fairy tales about fake authorities that will allegedly make them burn in hell for eternity. I could go on and on and on and on about the detailed specifics of exactly why your deer question was a non-question and a logical fallacy, but I think you get the idea. Or at the very least I hope you get the idea. Who knows I may have even strange absolutes being tossed at me in your next reply that I can't imagine just yet.
Vampires cling to death, not life. They are rotten. They create death, they eat death, they are death. So again, not really sure how you're coming up with these things. But thanks for the compliment. I don't think most people have your view of me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry, it was difficult to tell in text. Often times when I'm just being straight forward in a neutral pragmatic way, you seem to think you've offended me or something. So, we do misunderstand each other quite a bit. But at least we can both acknowledge that and move through it like two civil humans. lol. It is more than most people seem capable of!
Nature is always in a state of evolution, but Darwinian Evolution is a made up piece of garbage that has been proven false over and over again. Darwin hijacked the word "evolution" in the conscious awareness of people, so most people don't even really understand what the word means anymore. Evolution and adaptation really are basically the same thing. It means to be able to improve in the face of challenges.
DNA is also very flexible. The actual science of genetics completely debuniks Darwinian Evolution. DNA is completely modifiable at any point in any individual creature's development. When we eat GMOs, our DNA is being modified in various ways and people just aren't aware of it. There are things called axons and introns (i may or may not be spelling that correctly) which are basically like little switches where certain forms of gene expression are toggled on, or toggled off. It is our environment which toggles these things on and off. So the idea of environmental pollution and such has deeper consequences than merely "taking in poison is bad". Our DNA can adapt, evolve and change in an instant using the toggling of these axons and intros.
DNA and biology are far more amazing and fascinating than most people realize. We are capable of so much, but indoctrinated into thinking we are so incapable, limited and helpless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's just a massive excuse liberal leaders use to have fancy vacations
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is a lot more than that, it is the ultimate gas lighting weapon for malignant narcissists.
"If you don't do as I say, you're ruining the planet, and that means you're a terrible person!!!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If it strokes peoples Feels then it will make money.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In hind sight, all Hitler, Stalin or any other tyrant would have had to do is speak on a "unite to fight climate change" platform -- and the entire world would have been an open air concentration camp within a couple decades. So, thats pretty much what today's tyrants are working towards, seeing as they've learned from the mistakes of history. By 2030 they want the whole world in an open air concentration camp digital dystopia. It is pretty obvious when one understands that the world is run by psychopathic nut jobs. We don't have politicians and CEOs, we have fucking CULT LEADERS and the MSM is the biggest "mega church" ever designed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Statism is the global religion. They just need a deity, and they're working on that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I mean a deity for the rest of us to worship within the statist cult. Other than maybe currency pretending to be money.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Those are likely candidates. I'd imagine they're going to want to design some sort of very specific system that doesn't exist yet, with some sort of figure head of some sort at the top that is worshiped. Perhaps even a worship of Earth and nature, in the context of "if you obey the totalitarian state, you are saving the Earth. but if you disobey, you are harming the Earth, and this makes you a criminal and terrible person!".
I guess it is just most accurate to say that whatever they can get us to fall for, they'll do it -- regardless of the semantics of that those things do or do not look like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Not entirely surprised.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1