HOME | DD

paradigm-shifting β€” Politically Incorrect Freedom Zone by

Published: 2013-09-03 13:35:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 10810; Favourites: 241; Downloads: 76
Redirect to original
Description Debates are voluntary, not mandatory. People reserve the right to not give a flying fuck. Your approval is not needed for someone to think, feel and express themselves authentically; even if they authentically believe that alien space raccoons are trying to take over the world, or if they faithfully insist that you have a small dick. As long as they present their statements in admission that it is THEIR PERSPECTIVE and THEIR RIGHT TO HAVE IT, then they can believe whatever the hell they want and they are not obligated to present you with evidence. Having an opinion, feelings or systems of belief is not "disinfo". Its called individuality. If you don't respect individuality, you're a cock sucking nazi. And, thats our opinion. Not an absolute fact, merely an individuated perspective of reality; equal to all others which exist


NOTE: do as you wish with this sign. Download it. Re-upload it. Post it on your bedroom door. Wipe your ass with it. Whatever does it for you.
Related content
Comments: 370

Hsien-KoLover In reply to ??? [2019-07-29 01:44:35 +0000 UTC]

As I said, I’m not an asshole. I may not hold back my opinions, but I always make sure to be as polite about them as possible. So please, consider who you speak to before you decide to spout off your rhetoric, lest you be labeled as the same thing you claim to despise. I am not saying this to upset you. I am saying this for your own safety.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 01:48:25 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 01:53:07 +0000 UTC]

You misunderstand my intentions-and the words I use. Not once have I referred to you as a β€œbitch”. I am only trying to be polite. Please let this message register in your mind, and refrain from claiming I used language that I clearly did not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 02:14:06 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 03:33:05 +0000 UTC]

Again, you misunderstand.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 03:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:13:32 +0000 UTC]

I do, since I am the one attempting to communicate to you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:16:59 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:18:18 +0000 UTC]

This is no laughing matter, mister.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:19:59 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:20:37 +0000 UTC]

I find your lack of situational awareness disturbing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:20:58 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:25:31 +0000 UTC]

How have I been haughty? I’ve been nothing but polite to you, and you respond to it with jokes at my expense and an utterly rude disregard for what I’m trying to convey.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:28:42 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:31:10 +0000 UTC]

...are you implying that I am stupid? Because that is what you seem to be implying. If not, then please, feel free to elaborate...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:34:32 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:38:09 +0000 UTC]

So you’re saying that I am stupid? Well, SIR...I am the furthest thing from stupid, and the fact that you would imply otherwise greatly displeases me. You are being unspeakably rude, when I have done nothing but be polite to you, and yet I am the β€œopinionated asshole” to you? Sir...I think your drink was spiked, because no one here believes me to be stupid. Arrogant? Perhaps. Strange? Absolutely. But stupid? Not even a little.

In...other...words...

YOU. ARE. WRONG.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:40:59 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:43:23 +0000 UTC]

I am not against social justice as a concept.

I am against the ABUSE of social justice. Even someone like you, who seems unable to differentiate a polite statement from an aggressive insult, should know EXACTLY what it is I am talking about. I am sorry if that came across as rude. However...you have angered me-an emotion not easily conveyed through text alone.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:44:12 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:48:58 +0000 UTC]

Not even remotely, You boisterous bagbrain.

Abuse Of social justice mean committing hate crimes against minorities, degrading people who do not deserve it, and failing to understand the motto upon which this country was built-β€œWe hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal”. This includes women, people of color, transgender people, homosexuals, and more...something you have clearly seemed to have forgotten.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GalaxyRailways2199 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2019-07-29 04:52:55 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to GalaxyRailways2199 [2019-07-29 04:54:32 +0000 UTC]

...I did not vote for Donald Trump, if that’s what you’re thinking. I voted for Hilary Clinton.

Does THAT prove I am not against social justice, or do I need more evidence to prove a point that should have already been proven when I explained what abuse of social justice actually is?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to ??? [2017-07-19 16:52:20 +0000 UTC]

You're not being "politically incorrect." You're just being an ass.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Hsien-KoLover In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-19 21:43:37 +0000 UTC]

What?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to Hsien-KoLover [2017-07-20 01:46:33 +0000 UTC]

People who claim to be "politically incorrect" are just asses.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-20 04:47:48 +0000 UTC]

This is political correctness

If you have an opinion, and you want say something that SHOULD BE protected by the first amendment, don't say it. you might offend someone.

If you have an opinion that differs from the democrats, your a racist, sexist, and/or Β white trash/male supremacist.

The Majority can't say anything about their beliefs, but the minority can say whatever the hell they want. (I mean come on WTF happened to freedom of speech)

If your republican your a racist. (I find this ironic considering that the republicans freed the south)

It 100% ok for some lazy asshole to take 10% of your paycheck that YOU EARNED.(welfare should be: can't find a job? the government gives you one. the old ways work best sometimes.

Corrupt gov officials (H. Clinton) can run for president. (did you really think we could trust her after Benghazi and the 30k email that just magically disappeared? She let four of our boys die.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-20 04:57:13 +0000 UTC]

Whatevs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-20 05:06:03 +0000 UTC]

Because you know I'm right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-20 05:19:41 +0000 UTC]

Nope

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-20 06:02:08 +0000 UTC]

So it's ok to burn DC because Clinton wasn't elected?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-20 07:03:33 +0000 UTC]

If it's okay to want to lynch Obama and claim he's not an American citizen and do other racist things just because he won.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-20 18:01:29 +0000 UTC]

It isn't right that people did that, but at least that was peaceful. But lets be honest, Obama was a shit president. Brings the deficit up. canceled the YF-23 program. sold our jobs to other countries. need I continue

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-20 18:21:45 +0000 UTC]

Spoken like a true conservative

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 01:08:17 +0000 UTC]

And I'm Damn Proud of it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 01:16:37 +0000 UTC]

That's really sad

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 14:19:49 +0000 UTC]

Let me guess. Just because I'm republican you think I'm a racist? I am Wrong?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 14:20:42 +0000 UTC]

Maybe lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 14:23:04 +0000 UTC]

That Comment right there makes you the racist and aΒ hypocrite.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 14:23:52 +0000 UTC]

OMG UR CRAYCRAY

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 14:34:55 +0000 UTC]

Some thing democrats don't understand is: your allow your own opinion. However, as you just demonstrated, democrats think that if someone has an opinion that differs from theirs, that someone is a racist. But hey that's just an opinion. Don't go burn DC because of it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 14:38:36 +0000 UTC]

Lmao

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 14:41:37 +0000 UTC]

oh so we finally agree on something.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 14:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Hm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 14:55:46 +0000 UTC]

Oh and the canceling the YF-23 program didn't exactly help our national debt

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 14:56:38 +0000 UTC]

K

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

justaguy1701 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-21 15:19:21 +0000 UTC]

Finally this conversation is over

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to justaguy1701 [2017-07-21 15:23:44 +0000 UTC]

Okay

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

JJP158mk2 In reply to FluffyKyubey42 [2017-07-23 20:05:47 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

FluffyKyubey42 In reply to JJP158mk2 [2017-07-23 20:10:04 +0000 UTC]

Found the conservative

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


<= Prev | | Next =>