HOME | DD

#air #airplane #army #attack #bomber #cannon #cross #fantasy #force #ground #heavy #howitzer #plane #section #sparrow #wwi #wwii
Published: 2016-04-02 23:19:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 17014; Favourites: 429; Downloads: 288
Redirect to original
Description
The "Sparrow" as it is called in the imperial air force service is a heavy attack plane to be used mainly against heavily fortified positions- bunkers, pillboxes and gun emplacements. The concept rose in the early stages of the great war when the difficulty of destroying heavy fortifications by means of artillery bombardment and imprecise air bombing became apparent. The Sparrow was conceived to break this stalemate by directly attacking these heavy fortifications with a short-barreled 158mm-cannon specifically designed for the task. The Sparrow can fire its main armament in level flight, but the heavy gun makes steep dives impossible, so direct attack on targets from low level flight is favoured. The heavy armament makes flying the plane a challenging task and usually Sparrow pilots are picked from among the best combat pilots.The plane is manned by 5 crew- pilot, turret gunner, two loaders(one of which doubles as a navigator) and bombardier. The considerable weight of the main armament and ammunition requires a powerful engine and the most powerful new 12-cylinder air-cooled Mk.III engine was chosen. The different ammunition types for the main gun include armor piercing, high explosive and air burst shell to be used against infantry, zeppelins and (in exceptional and extremely rare circumstances) airplanes. The main gun's considerable recoil is negated through advanced hydraulic cylinders and strong mounting structure to relegate much of the recoil into the hull. Secondary armament includes two 20mm autocannons located in the wings. Defensive armament is somewhat lacking due to the weight limitations set by the heavy armament and engine, consisting of a single 7.7mm machine gun located in a turret behind the pilot's seat.
Other features of the Sparrow include self-sealing fuel tanks, advanced gun sight system and an advanced (for its time) full aluminium hull construction. The plane was received for combat tests during the second year of the war and proved effective against most field fortifications, although the heaviest forts remained mostly impervious to its fire. Favoured tactic of ace crews was to fly very low towards a pillbox weak point such as a observation slit and fire a delayed fuze AP round into the bunker, destroying it in one hit.Β
----
I had a day in between commission work days for my own stuff and decided I should sketch a simple cross-section of a plane design I had been thinking about for a few days now. Somehow I'm very amused by the concept of having a massive gun fitted inside a relatively small plane.
Original A3, 0.3mm mechanical pencil.
Enjoy!
Related content
Comments: 41
cullyferg2010 [2017-12-08 04:23:43 +0000 UTC]
Reminds me of the Beechcraft Grizzly ground attack plane from WW2.Β It carried a couple of .50 cal machine guns around a 75 mm howitzer in the nose.Β The project showed promise, but was canceled as it used the same engine as the B-29.
π: 1 β©: 0
DeyrellSword [2017-07-31 19:04:06 +0000 UTC]
I`d like one day to build kinda thing for myself!) Music from strike vector perfectly fits your art))))0)))
π: 0 β©: 0
JasonWolfe [2017-02-22 19:56:06 +0000 UTC]
The Germans, Russians, and Americans all experimented with "destroyers" armed with cannons larger than 40mm. The Germans even had a version of the Me-262 fitted with a 75mm gun.
π: 0 β©: 0
ebarr [2016-07-27 09:36:35 +0000 UTC]
Impressively detailed although I left feeling that it would be a bit of a flying coffin for the crews since bailing out from the top would put you through the prop O-o
Still if it is ground attack maybe they figure no one's parachute would have time to open anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to ebarr [2016-07-30 22:16:55 +0000 UTC]
True, true. I think it might have a lever or a trigger which detaches the propellerin the event the crew should bail out- that's a common practice on these types of designs. That, or the might just have accepted the danger of flying this thing... there have been plane types in service that have had serious problems with crew ejection. The low level flying this would be doing would probably also negate the need for proper crew bail safety anyways, like you said.
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
EdXCal [2016-06-10 17:38:19 +0000 UTC]
I love the look, the layout and the concept, the only suggestion I'd give is the wings are to far forward. The center of gravity would be close to the engine and the wings would need to be closer to said engine. I love the forward swept wings to the booms too, just great work!
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to EdXCal [2016-07-30 22:19:57 +0000 UTC]
That might be true. I imagine the cannon and ammo balancing the weight nicely though, being a massive block of gunmetal that it is though I'm no aeronautic engineer. I'll keep the design consideration in mind for future use though.
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
DreadHaven [2016-04-11 04:03:18 +0000 UTC]
damn your draughtsmanship is on point. looked like a digital piece due to how clean it was. Great design tooΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to DreadHaven [2016-04-11 10:01:33 +0000 UTC]
Ha, thanks! I keep my lineart pretty crisp so you might think it's CG, but closer inspection reveals it isn't- I only color on computer basically. The tiny 0.3mm mechanical pencil I use also contributes to the clean lines.
Glad you like it!
π: 0 β©: 1
DreadHaven In reply to PenUser [2016-04-12 05:04:28 +0000 UTC]
I need to get me a mechanical pencil then. for my design class in any case. i keep smudging all my assignmentsΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Lamp0 [2016-04-04 16:09:09 +0000 UTC]
Wow, fantastic work!
Would be cool to see it inked. Though perhaps ink a copy so as to save the original pencils!
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to Lamp0 [2016-04-05 22:03:24 +0000 UTC]
True, that might be a nice lil' project- I'll do that if I have the time from commissions and other things. Too bad I don't have a light-desk so that I could trace the inks on a new paper though so I usually end up drawing on the originals. :/
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
spacewolflord [2016-04-04 02:25:18 +0000 UTC]
That is a neat aircraft with one hell of an gun and engine.Β From reading the description I would have thought it would have been a two engine craft.
Thank you for sharing.
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to spacewolflord [2016-04-04 09:09:20 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I thought of drawing a twin-engine design but somehow it would've looked so conventional and boring- I wanted the plane to have a bit of a fantasy touch and character to it. I think the single engine and hull design accomplished that pretty well.
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 1
spacewolflord In reply to PenUser [2016-04-04 10:57:16 +0000 UTC]
Keep on Daring to be different.
π: 0 β©: 0
TumultOfZen [2016-04-04 01:52:12 +0000 UTC]
How long did this take approximately? The detail work on the individual rivets and positions of the crew is staggering, and it boggles my mind how this could be done so cleanly.
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to TumultOfZen [2016-04-04 09:06:48 +0000 UTC]
Around 4 hours or thereabouts. It was a project for my hangover day, I just didn't have the energy for commission work. I think the detailed lineart is much due to me using 0.3mm mechanical pencil, it makes for really crisp lines. Other than that you just need to be careful not to smudge the lines and you're ok.
Thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
Vincent-Wullf [2016-04-03 19:32:21 +0000 UTC]
Holy shit that's impressive... You really have everything well worked out in that
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to Vincent-Wullf [2016-04-03 19:56:28 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I was mostly just thinking along the lines of "how would this solution actually work if it was real", but obviously if you think on some design choices on it you'll see it's no engineer's work... a nice little exercise in detail though.
π: 0 β©: 1
Vincent-Wullf In reply to PenUser [2016-04-03 20:19:05 +0000 UTC]
A really good exercise at that XD
π: 0 β©: 0
RRaillery [2016-04-03 16:38:42 +0000 UTC]
Your work is so amazing, it is hard not to spend a while looking through your whole gallery over again every time you post something new. You've honed your cutaway craft to such a realistic mastery that even an absurd idea- an absurdly awesome one- comes to the cusp of believability.
I do have some ideas for improvement on the concept, if you're interested. Not the illustrative work, which is awesome, but more in regards to the backstory you've envisioned for this craft. Firstly, the main armament is technically a cannon not a howitzer, though "howitzer" does admittedly sound cool, as it fires on a flat trajectory. Secondly, getting this craft off the ground with however many tons of gunmetal in its nose and keeping it aloft would be difficult enough, so diving and other aerobatics are out of the question and using the main gun against airplanes is similarly futile. Thirdly, though I thoroughly enjoy the idea of the dedicated, prone-positioned bombardier/navigator, he couldn't navigate for beans. It would be far easier to give the navigation role to one of the loaders, who might have space for charts and a nice plotting table downstairs. Fourthly, while the hydraulic dampers are practical for controlling recoil until the shell has exited the barrel and ergo ensuring accuracy, a rail recoil system (which I cannot quite spot in your illustration) is a disastrous idea. The inescapable physics dictate that all recoil forces will eventually have to be absorbed by the airframe and allowing the massive gun cradle to go hurtling towards the rear of the aircraft would violently shift the center of gravity, to say nothing of how this momentous object is halted.
Whew! Sorry for the length of those suggestions. Feel free to take them as you please.
And I almost didn't notice the airspeed impeller on the tail. An excellent little detail that lends to the realism, though perhaps being mounted almost directly behind the propeller would cause excessive interference.
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to RRaillery [2016-04-03 20:28:13 +0000 UTC]
I always appreciate thought out critisism- it's too rare these days!
Anyway, I do agree on the suggestions mostly. They're all quite valid and the points on the gun being a cannon and the navigator not having any space being the ones that I find most relevant. I didn't even think of the fact that the bombardier would need to fold out a map in that space! The points on flying this brick let alone doing steep dives and the whole recoil assembly making the plane essentially unflyable are a bit less essential considering the fact that this is a fantasy design- but nonetheless I altered the description to make the backstory better. Hopefully it sounds better now! It's always important to listen to someone who can find these small design problems and inconsistensies from my somewhat extraneously detailed illustrations and descriptions. For that, I thank you.
The rail mechanism is visible as only a few lines on the bottom of the hull, but those can be interpreted as part of the supports of the landing gear and gun as well, so it doesn't really matter now that I've amended the description. Also, I didn't think of the airflow problems related to the airspeed impeller situated where it is now... I can only assume they fixed that problem for the mk.II of the plane! It probably led to a fair few accidents, I assume...
π: 0 β©: 1
RRaillery In reply to PenUser [2016-04-03 21:04:20 +0000 UTC]
Glad my thoughts were well-received. I like your backstory edits; they make it all feel more plausible.
"in exceptional and extremely rare circumstances"- I laughed out loud right there. I suppose it would be wrong to rule out the possibility entirely. What a big surprise for the pilot on the other end of the barrel!
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to RRaillery [2016-04-03 21:18:34 +0000 UTC]
Ha, it does sound quite comical- I just had to leave it there since I like the idea of using such an outlandish attack against another aircraft. It would make for an excellent comic page! I have to say that the enemy pilot would either need to be very unlucky, plain stupid or very green(or possibly all of those) to get hit. In any case I got the whole idea of using the cannon in AA role from the san-shiki shell of the Yamato-class battleship which was a pretty odd concept, too.
π: 0 β©: 0
artlovr59 [2016-04-03 15:04:07 +0000 UTC]
Very nice!
My first impression was it was a Varga X/H X/G experimental aircraft of the Hungarian Air Force in WWII. Oops, got that wrong!
hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMI%E2%8β¦
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to artlovr59 [2016-04-03 20:30:10 +0000 UTC]
Oh, true- it does look a bit similar in some respects, particularily in the nose and cockpit area. Interesting!
Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 1
blackdragons6 [2016-04-03 05:08:00 +0000 UTC]
Magnificent, if I saw this flying in the sky, I would not be able to get my eyes off of it
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to MEDIAMAINFRAME16 [2016-04-03 20:31:26 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! These are usually something I make for fun sometimes, glad you like them.
π: 0 β©: 0
PenUser In reply to KodyYoung [2016-04-03 20:34:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I've been trying to improve on the detailing of these sketches, hopefully it shows.
π: 0 β©: 0
marcoasalazarm In reply to PenUser [2016-04-03 21:59:44 +0000 UTC]
I like gadgets of all types, you know? And I may be a robotics and whatever guy, but I have a serious hot spot for "Diesel-punk" (y'know, stuff that seems was done during WWII) gadgets.
So that plane... man, it just hits me hard in the "cool" feels.
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to marcoasalazarm [2016-04-04 09:56:11 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I know what you mean- that's exactly the reason why I draw these planes!
π: 0 β©: 0
doug7070 [2016-04-02 23:28:20 +0000 UTC]
Incredible work, the level of detail and engineering thought in this piece is stunning!
π: 0 β©: 1
PenUser In reply to doug7070 [2016-04-03 20:35:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I find it interesting to think of the different mechanical solutions that might make something like this somewhat believable- glad you like it!
π: 0 β©: 0