HOME | DD

Phaeton99 — GALAXY Class Refit Concept 1

Published: 2009-05-09 14:28:53 +0000 UTC; Views: 9668; Favourites: 66; Downloads: 330
Redirect to original
Description A concept for the refitting of the GALAXY class.

Around the time of — but originally unrelated to — the USS Galaxy Admiral's Bridge project phaeton99.deviantart.com/art/U… , I was considering how the GALAXY Class might be updated to meet the standards of the current setting timeframe as represented by Enterprise-E.  The consideration was spurred by a fleeting idea for a bit of fan fiction in which the current Enterprise meets its massively refit predecessor from an alternate future timeline (inspired by a vague notion about the survival of Picard's nephew, who would appear as the Captain of this ship)  in which it was Kirk, not Picard, who emerged alive from the tangle with Dr.Soren, and due to a quirk of circumstance, "D" was never destroyed... a story idea that never quite gelled for a variety of reasons.  The notion of refitting the GALAXY Class, however, seemed worth pursuing, regardless.

I compiled a list of the all sorts of prospective alterations — from such minor details as SOVEREIGN-type lifeboats, an enlarged impulse deck, a new bridge module, and Defiant-like Captain's Yacht;  to major component changes like new nacelles, a potentially deepened keel and a reshaped neck — and arbitrarily applied them mentally to what had long been my imagined "personal" ship of the class, the "USS Millennium" (or alternately, "Millennia" — and yes, the Captain's yacht is called the "Falcon", of course  ), with the idea that this latter-day GALAXY might be built from the keel with these new attributes. 

Ultimately, I conceived of the list as also representing a major refit program for the Class as a whole and dubbed it the "Millennium Refit" after that vessel.

It was about a year ago (2008) that I began to try putting these ideas into practice, starting with the more major changes.

Above is one of several quick experiments testing variations on the look of the new neck I had envisioned:  more aggressively raked than the original, repositioning the saucer a few decks lower on the vertical axis and slightly more forward. (note the inset profile comparison).

This particular idea was an old one, dating back to my first impressions of Enterprise-D back in 1988.  I thought the ship looked too awkwardly duck-like in profile and thought it would be improved with a more swan-like neck that thrust the primary hull forward, making for a sleeker form.  I later became accustomed to Ent-D's proportions, but the idea endured. Prior to the new experiments, I had never used actual GALAXY components to test its merits.

Engineering-wise, reconfiguring the neck would not be an unreasonably complicated alteration of the space-frame, even though it would significantly alter the appearance of the ship, since neither the attachments to the saucer nor engineering hull would be significantly changed (though the lower mounting ended up significantly wider here to accommodate the thickening of the neck).  The argument for doing so might be high warp efficiency or impulse maneuverability; or be related to some aspect of the new engines installed.

I added an armored collar around the main deflector — just barely visible here — inspired by a production study model for the TNG Enterprise that featured something of the sort (see p.71 of The Art of Star Trek, 1995 edition).

The saucer grid has been completely reworked to de-emphaisze the radial symmetry of the hull, and better differentiate the forward sections from the aft. I tried to give both the impression of armor platting and a subtle suggestion of wings — not in the Romulan sense, but rather as a different way of conceiving of the spread of the wide elliptical hull in an era of more dart-like ships.

Not visible on the schematics is a concept for the main impulse exhausts (which is now the saucer units, not the smaller engineering hull ones): in addition to the large vents topside, a set of smaller ones would appear on the underside of each unit, allowing direct thrust to be vectored more easily across a wider arc. This is an idea that struck me soon after noting that Enterprise -E's impulse decks seem to lack a clear mechanical means to direct impulse thrust at a low angle.

I'm still toying with the idea of integrating some sort of warp nacelles into the saucer for separated operation, either as submerged structures or extendible — but I have yet to come up with a satisfactory solution.


Alternate Concept
Related content
Comments: 20

bjmaxvin67 [2017-07-21 01:11:24 +0000 UTC]

This is really excellent work; I really do love the more sleeker look of the this Galaxy Class.  Would you consider creating a concept for the refitting of the NEBULA class.   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to bjmaxvin67 [2017-07-21 03:26:05 +0000 UTC]

Given how old this experiment is, extending it to Nebula is unlikely — but not impossible.  In any event, a return to this little project is not going to happen any time soon.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

ArmamentDawg [2013-04-29 05:16:44 +0000 UTC]

Personally, I prefer the silhouette of this concept- it seems more aggressive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to ArmamentDawg [2013-04-30 00:28:47 +0000 UTC]

There is a reason why I posted it as well. It has its strengths over the alternative version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Richard-Daborn [2013-03-12 02:32:13 +0000 UTC]

This is an amazing redesign, still retains the look of the Galaxy and yet massively improves it. The Galaxy is an awkward looking ship, looks awesome from some angles yet looks like a cow from others. I bet this looks fantastic from any angle.

I tried something similar myself ages ago but not a diagram. I think i'll go back and rework it see what i can come up with.

Great work mate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to Richard-Daborn [2013-03-16 19:18:58 +0000 UTC]

In truth, there is only a small deviation from the original, here, and I may take it a bit further from the Probert design if I revisit it — such as reworking the nacelle pylons into angled ones, rather than the 90-degree bend.

Now, if I can just lay my hands one some reliable specs for each of the original key superstructures to work from...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CaptRicoSakara [2013-01-28 08:00:52 +0000 UTC]

I love the two concepts - they look like they could be applied to an up-to-date version of the classic galaxy-class. I just recently built a LEGO moc of a JJ Abrams-style Excelsior, and seeing this design makes me want to build her too. You think this version could be applies to the JJ Abrams Universe in the 24th century? =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to CaptRicoSakara [2013-01-28 19:00:35 +0000 UTC]

Although I cannot say I favor of the Abrams-Trek design aesthetic, there is technically no reason why it couldn't be adapted to it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CaptRicoSakara In reply to Phaeton99 [2013-01-30 05:02:25 +0000 UTC]

still, it would be nice to see an Abrams version of the old Galaxy-Class and even the Galaxy-X. Might be more stylish and seeker than the Venture-Class refit on Star Trek Online. Speaking of Galaxy-X, I just go my Galaxy-X Diamond Selects toy today from ebay.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ironscythe [2009-07-11 15:24:45 +0000 UTC]

I think I'm in love. Great work. I would say, though, that this "New Galaxy" needs a new name to go with the look. Keeping with the hull-type's cosmological nomenclature (Nebula-class included), I think "Quasar" has a nice ring to it. Quasars are young (or new) galaxies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to ironscythe [2009-07-11 16:32:19 +0000 UTC]

Considering that it is merely a refit of the GALAXY, not a new ship, it is rather stuck with its old name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironscythe In reply to Phaeton99 [2009-07-11 17:16:32 +0000 UTC]

There is such a thing as sub-classes. It may not be entirely canonical, but the Akyazi-class has the Arbiter and Akula sub-classes.

But it's your design, so you're the boss. Still kicks all kinds of ass.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to ironscythe [2009-07-12 17:57:09 +0000 UTC]

If there would be a sub-class designation, it would likely be "Millennium", since that was the name of the first ship to be built in this form from the keel up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ironscythe In reply to Phaeton99 [2009-07-12 18:30:15 +0000 UTC]

I see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WoodsideKid [2009-05-10 16:07:53 +0000 UTC]

Perhaps the solution would be a combined warp-impulse engine module integrated into the saucer itself, something like a cross between the extended hull section of the Reliant and the built-in warp engines of the Defiant. It wouldn't have that "pasted-on" look, and might in fact hearken back to the stairstep design of the Sovereign's aft saucer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to WoodsideKid [2009-05-10 17:13:16 +0000 UTC]

Indeed: that is the sort of solution I have tended toward — but haven't quite managed to work out to my satisfaction.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chimera335 [2009-05-09 16:20:34 +0000 UTC]

I like it, overall!

I'm not sure about the visual effect of way the deflector grid on the saucer seems to split... but I like the intention. Also, if you're considering a warp system for the saucer, why not consider retractable small nacelles like on the Prometheus saucer (arrow)?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to chimera335 [2009-05-09 18:19:26 +0000 UTC]

I have studied the Prometheus arrangement but it would prove problematic here, given the arrangement of hull features like the main shuttle bay. Likewise, I think that the scale of Promethean nacelles would be undersized for a ship of this mass, even if upscaled proportionately.

Any sort of reasonable-sized nacelle has been the sticking point: demanding so much volume if retractable; a clumsy tag-on if always deployed.

This issue may ultimately requite an unconventional solution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chimera335 In reply to Phaeton99 [2009-05-10 18:30:49 +0000 UTC]

One final thought: how about mounting two retractable Prometheus-type mini-nacelles on either side of the saucer superstructure, between where the bridge oval is and where the phaser arcs are? That might only require relatively limited modifications.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Phaeton99 In reply to chimera335 [2009-05-11 02:13:16 +0000 UTC]

I am not confident that mini-nacelles would be powerful enough for a structure this large and massive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0