HOME | DD

Published: 2012-06-22 06:23:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 3034; Favourites: 63; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description
Please disseminate widely, thank you! This does not give permission to alter or claim credit for this work, for which I retain all copyrights.If you disagree with the views expressed here, please be sure to read my Policy Statement BEFORE you post: [link]
Republican science at its finest.
Related content
Comments: 28
poasterchild In reply to ChristineIsDEAD [2012-06-26 14:41:47 +0000 UTC]
Heheheh. Thanks, Christine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Quoththeraven2010 [2012-06-25 03:27:46 +0000 UTC]
Um, trees help us breathe, so yeah, we all die if we get rid of trees
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
poasterchild In reply to Quoththeraven2010 [2012-06-25 05:36:14 +0000 UTC]
It's a satire. A parody. :dohiconplz:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheAnonymousZ [2012-06-25 00:32:02 +0000 UTC]
I guess my plans to see the California redwoods this summer will have to be cancelled...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
poasterchild In reply to kyriesin [2012-06-23 00:29:46 +0000 UTC]
Now THAT's outstanding! Thanks so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
haunter27 [2012-06-22 19:37:17 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. I would find this hilarious, but the science is just incorrect--plants are a CO2 sink. Animals are CO2 emitters. It's pretty simple.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
poasterchild In reply to haunter27 [2012-06-23 00:34:10 +0000 UTC]
As noted below, that's the joke, son. That's why the comment says"Republican science at its finest."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kyriesin In reply to haunter27 [2012-06-22 22:34:08 +0000 UTC]
That's the pun. The science is supposed to be incorrect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
haunter27 In reply to kyriesin [2012-06-22 22:52:51 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I know. And again, I like your piece. I just think it might be funnier if you depicted the Republicans as misinterpreting the science, rather than getting it blatantly backwards.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
poasterchild In reply to haunter27 [2012-06-23 00:31:09 +0000 UTC]
This poaster was prompted by the Republicans outright lies about climate change, claiming that CO2 isn't a pollutant because humans emit it in their breath, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
emperorkirkwall [2012-06-22 15:28:26 +0000 UTC]
Eh....we need them to survive.....but silly politician would not know that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
megasean3000 [2012-06-22 13:39:21 +0000 UTC]
Errrr....They emit Oxygen? They're nature's way of ensuring we don't pollute the air with greenhouse gases? God, humans can be so dumb
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ApocryphionXII [2012-06-22 13:26:11 +0000 UTC]
LOL silly Republicans, trees emit Carbon Dioxide not CO2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jLundhArt In reply to ApocryphionXII [2012-06-22 14:24:11 +0000 UTC]
Sorry in advance if you meant to be sarcastical on this one, but Carbon dioxide IS CO2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ApocryphionXII In reply to jLundhArt [2012-06-22 22:47:24 +0000 UTC]
I was indeed trying to be sarcastic. It's okay.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyRhianwriter [2012-06-22 13:06:56 +0000 UTC]
They sort of already have, for a while. During the Bush Administration, they sold stuff so that it looks green and forested from the roads, but beyond that, they are cut down, so that people don't really notice a difference. And they only emit CO2 at night. During the day, it's O2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RheJulMag [2012-06-22 10:15:45 +0000 UTC]
Yeah! Down with trees! Breathing and living is overrated *sarcasm*.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0